ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07335471Updated Jan 13, 2026

Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Complications in Maintenance Hemodialysis (MHD) Patients

An interventional study of Continuous High-Glucose Infusion and Regular Hemoperfusion in Maintenance Hemodialysis in Uremia; Chronic, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) and Cerebrovascular Disorders, sponsored by Suzhou Municipal Hospital of Anhui Province. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-13.

Sponsored by Suzhou Municipal Hospital of Anhui Province · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Dec 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background and Purpose: This clinical study aims to explore and validate two innovative treatment strategies to address two major challenges faced by patients on maintenance hemodialysis (uremia): the high incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications and the common occurrence of ultrafiltration intolerance/refractory intradialytic hypotension.

Study Design: The research consists of two main parts, employing a prospective, interventional design.

Hemoperfusion (HP) for Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Complications: The investigators plan to enroll approximately 200 uremic patients on dialysis at the study center. Initially, a detailed survey of their existing cardiovascular health status and related risk factors will be conducted. Subsequently, a standardized hemoperfusion treatment platform will be established and evaluated, observing its effects on removing relevant toxins and improving biochemical markers. Finally, a subset of patients who have already developed such complications will be invited to participate in a comparative study. They will be randomly assigned to receive either conventional dialysis or conventional dialysis combined with intensified hemoperfusion therapy to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen.

Continuous High-Glucose Infusion for Ultrafiltration Intolerance: For patients suffering from severe ultrafiltration intolerance and refractory hypotension during glucose-free dialysis that does not respond to standard therapies (36 patients have been enrolled), an interventional study was conducted. Patients received a continuous infusion of 50% glucose solution during dialysis, supplemented by glucose boluses as needed. The study primarily observed whether this protocol could safely extend dialysis duration, increase ultrafiltration volume, and improve dialysis adequacy and related symptoms.

Participants: The study will be conducted at the Blood Purification Center of Suzhou Hospital. The main participants are adults aged 18 or older, diagnosed with uremia and receiving maintenance hemodialysis. For the cardiovascular/cerebrovascular part, patients must meet specific inclusion criteria; for the ultrafiltration intolerance part, patients must be diagnosed with refractory intradialytic hypotension unresponsive to standard therapy.

Study Procedures: All participants will provide informed consent before joining the study. The study will collect patient medical history, conduct physical examinations, blood tests, and questionnaires according to the protocol. Patients receiving hemoperfusion or high-glucose infusion interventions will undergo close monitoring of vital signs and efficacy evaluations before and after treatment. Some participants may be scheduled for regular follow-up to understand their long-term outcomes.

Potential Benefits and Risks: Participants may benefit directly from the study, for example: through the new treatment strategies, they may achieve better control of cardiovascular risks, reduce discomfort associated with hypotension (such as dizziness and cramping), and increase ultrafiltration volume and adequacy per session, potentially improving quality of life and long-term health outcomes. The risks involved are primarily routine medical risks associated with hemoperfusion or intravenous glucose infusion, such as bleeding or infection at the puncture site, blood glucose fluctuations, etc. All procedures will be performed by experienced medical staff under strict supervision to maximize patient safety.

Social Significance: The results of this study are expected to provide clinicians with new, evidence-based treatment options for managing the complex and challenging complications in uremic dialysis patients. If proven effective and safe, these protocols may be incorporated into clinical practice guidelines, helping more patients achieve adequate and comfortable dialysis, ultimately improving patient prognosis and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uremia; Chronic
  • Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Intradialytic Hypotension
  • Ultrafiltration Intolerance
  • Dialysis Adequacy
03

In context

Uremia

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Uremia; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Uremia.

Browse Uremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Suzhou Municipal Hospital of Anhui Province is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between 18 and 80 years.
  2. Receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) for 3 months or longer.
  3. Diagnosis of severe ultrafiltration intolerance (UFI), defined as either:

    Persistent pre-dialysis hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg), OR

    Recurrent intradialytic hypotension (IDH), defined per KDOQI guidelines as a decrease in systolic blood pressure to \<90 mmHg or by >20 mmHg from baseline, accompanied by symptoms.

  4. Failure to achieve target ultrafiltration volume (mean UFV \<1.5 L per session) despite at least 4 weeks of conventional interventions (e.g., dialysate cooling, sodium profiling, sequential ultrafiltration).
  5. Inadequate dialysis delivery, defined as a mean single-pool Kt/V of less than 1.2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute infection, myocardial infarction, or major surgery within the past 3 months.
  2. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, defined as a (HbA1c) level greater than 9%.
  3. Severe liver dysfunction ( class C).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Continuous High-Glucose Infusion

    Other: Continuous High-Glucose Infusion and Regular Hemoperfusion in Maintenance Hemodialysis

Interventions

  • OtherContinuous High-Glucose Infusion and Regular Hemoperfusion in Maintenance Hemodialysis

    hemoperfusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Intradialytic Hypotension (IDH) Events

    This primary outcome measure assesses the frequency of intradialytic hypotension events during hemodialysis sessions. IDH is strictly defined as a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥20 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure drop of ≥10 mmHg, accompanied by clinical symptoms (e.g., dizziness, nausea, cramps) requiring nursing intervention. The measure will be reported as the number of IDH events per patient per dialysis session, calculated from nursing records and continuous blood pressure monitoring data throughout the intervention period.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Dialysis Adequacy Measured by Single-Pool Kt/V

    This measure assesses the efficacy of solute clearance during hemodialysis using the single-pool Kt/V formula, which is calculated based on pre- and post-dialysis blood urea nitrogen levels, dialysis duration, and ultrafiltration volume. A higher Kt/V value indicates more adequate dialysis.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Dialysis Adequacy Measured by Urea Reduction Ratio (URR)

    This measure assesses dialysis efficacy by the percentage reduction of blood urea nitrogen during a treatment session. URR is calculated from pre- and post-dialysis urea nitrogen levels. It is reported as a percentage (%).

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Serum B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Level

    This measure evaluates the change in cardiac load and fluid status by assessing serum BNP concentration. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and post-intervention for analysis. It is reported in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL).

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Serum Levels of Phosphate, Calcium, and Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)

    This measure evaluates changes in mineral and bone metabolism. Fasting blood samples will be collected at baseline and at scheduled intervals during the intervention period. Serum phosphate and calcium levels will be measured using standard laboratory biochemical analyzers, reported in mmol/L. Serum iPTH level will be measured using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, reported in pg/mL.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Severity of Uremic Pruritus

    This measure assesses the intensity of dialysis-related itch. The severity of pruritus will be evaluated by patients using a validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). The assessment will be recorded weekly during dialysis sessions throughout the study period. The outcome will be reported as the mean VAS score.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. Treatment Failure Rate for Refractory Ultrafiltration Intolerance

    This measure evaluates the clinical efficacy in managing ultrafiltration intolerance. Treatment failure is operationally defined as the inability to complete the prescribed dialysis duration or to achieve the target ultrafiltration volume due to intradialytic hypotension (IDH) that is unresponsive to the study's glucose infusion protocol, necessitating early session termination. This binary outcome (Yes/No) will be determined per dialysis session based on nursing and medical records.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v5.0

    All adverse events occurring from the start of the study intervention until the end of follow-up will be recorded. Each event will be graded for severity and assessed for relationship to the study procedures according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Incidence of Acute Platelet Count Reduction and Periprocedural Hypersensitivity Reactions during Hemoperfusion

    Two specific procedure-related events will be monitored: 1) Acute platelet reduction: defined as a decrease in platelet count by \>30% from the pre-hemoperfusion value measured within 24 hours post-procedure. 2) Hypersensitivity reaction: defined as the occurrence of symptoms such as rash, hypotension, bronchospasm, or anaphylaxis during or within 2 hours after the hemoperfusion procedure.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Peak Intradialytic Blood Glucose Level and Change in Pre-dialysis Fasting Glucose

    Glucose levels will be monitored to assess metabolic perturbation. 1) Peak intradialytic glucose: the highest capillary blood glucose value (in mmol/L) recorded during any dialysis session with glucose infusion. 2) Fasting glucose change: the difference between the pre-dialysis fasting plasma glucose (in mmol/L) measured at the end of the study period and the baseline value.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Number of Participants Who Permanently Discontinue the Study Intervention Due to an Adverse Event

    This measure records participants who permanently stop receiving either the hemoperfusion or the continuous glucose infusion protocol specifically because of an adverse event, regardless of the event's severity or relationship assessment.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Blood Purification Center, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University
    Suzhou, Anhui 234000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 23 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 16, 2025
First posted
Jan 13, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Jul 20, 2025
Last update
Jan 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07335471
Lead sponsor
Suzhou Municipal Hospital of Anhui Province
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Jul 20, 2025
Last update
Jan 13, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion