ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07522008ICHARUSUpdated Apr 21, 2026

ICHARUS: Italian Cooperative HemoAdsorption Study for Relief of Uremic Symptoms

An observational study in Chronic Kidney Disease 5D and Uremia; Chronic, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-21.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Many patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis continue to experience persistent uremic symptoms, such as pruritus, fatigue, sleep disorders, reduced physical performance, and impaired quality of life, despite optimized dialysis prescriptions. Conventional dialysis techniques mainly rely on diffusion and convection and may be insufficient to remove certain uremic toxins, particularly protein-bound and middle-molecule solutes.

Purpose:

The ICHARUS study (Italian Cooperative HemoAdsorption Study for Relief of Uremic Symptoms) is a prospective, observational, real-world registry designed to evaluate the clinical use of hemodialysis combined with hemoadsorption (HAHD) in patients with persistent uremic symptoms.

Study design:

ICHARUS is a multicenter registry enrolling adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis in whom hemoadsorption is prescribed according to routine clinical practice. Hemoadsorption is added to standard dialysis sessions without modifying the underlying dialysis modality or prescription. The study does not involve randomization or experimental interventions.

Outcomes:

The registry will collect data on patient-reported symptoms, quality of life, selected laboratory parameters, and safety outcomes at baseline and during follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. The aim is to describe symptom evolution, tolerability, and real-world treatment patterns associated with HAHD.

Significance:

By collecting standardized real-world data across multiple centers, the ICHARUS registry aims to improve understanding of the potential role of hemoadsorption in chronic hemodialysis, support harmonization of clinical practice, and generate hypotheses for future interventional studies.

Read the detailed description

Rationale Despite major advances in dialysis technology, a substantial proportion of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis continue to experience persistent uremic symptoms, including pruritus, fatigue, sleep disturbances, reduced physical performance, and impaired quality of life. Conventional dialysis modalities primarily rely on diffusive and convective solute transport and may be insufficient to remove specific classes of uremic toxins, particularly protein-bound solutes and selected middle molecules. Hemoadsorption combined with hemodialysis (HAHD) provides an additional adsorptive mechanism that may enhance the removal of these solutes and potentially contribute to symptom relief.

Study overview The ICHARUS study (Italian Cooperative HemoAdsorption Study for Relief of Uremic Symptoms) is a prospective, multicenter, observational real-world registry designed to describe the clinical use of HAHD in adult patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The registry aims to collect standardized data on indications, treatment patterns, symptom evolution, and safety outcomes associated with HAHD when prescribed as part of routine clinical practice.

Study design ICHARUS is a non-interventional cohort registry. Patient enrollment is based on clinical indication for hemoadsorption, as determined by the treating physician, in the presence of persistent uremic symptoms despite optimized conventional dialysis. The decision to initiate, continue, or discontinue hemoadsorption is entirely independent of study participation and follows local clinical practice. No randomization, mandated treatment changes, or protocol-driven interventions are applied.

Treatment characteristics Hemoadsorption is performed in combination with standard hemodialysis modalities, including low-flux hemodialysis, high-flux hemodialysis, expanded hemodialysis, or hemodiafiltration, according to center expertise and patient-specific prescription. Dialysis session duration, blood and dialysate flow rates, anticoagulation strategy, and treatment frequency are not dictated by the registry and remain at the discretion of the treating team.

Data collection and follow-up Data are collected at baseline and during routine follow-up visits at approximately 1, 3, and 6 months after enrollment. Collected variables include demographic and clinical characteristics, dialysis prescription parameters, patient-reported symptoms, selected laboratory markers, and safety-related information. Follow-up assessments are aligned with standard clinical care and do not require additional procedures beyond routine practice.

Safety considerations As an observational registry, ICHARUS does not introduce experimental treatments or additional risks beyond standard clinical care. Adverse events and safety signals potentially associated with HAHD are recorded descriptively, without predefined stopping rules or intervention thresholds.

Ethical aspects The registry is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable local regulations. Ethical approval is obtained at each participating center prior to patient enrollment. Written informed consent is collected according to local requirements.

Objectives and perspective The primary objective of the ICHARUS registry is to describe real-world patterns of HAHD use and associated changes in uremic symptoms and patient-reported outcomes over time. Secondary objectives include characterization of laboratory trends and treatment tolerability. By providing structured real-world evidence across multiple centers, the registry aims to support harmonization of clinical practice, improve patient endophenotyping, and generate hypotheses for future interventional studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease 5D
  • Uremia; Chronic

Keywords

  • Hemoadsorption
  • Hemodialysis
  • HAHD
  • Protein-bound uremic toxins
  • Middle molecules
  • Uremic symptoms
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality of life
  • Real-world registry
03

In context

Uremia

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Uremia; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 105 across 12 observational studies indexed under Uremia.

Browse Uremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients with end-stage kidney disease (CKD stage 5D) receiving maintenance hemodialysis in participating dialysis centers. Eligible participants are individuals with a stable dialysis regimen who report at least one clinically relevant uremic symptom at baseline, as assessed by the Dialysis Symptom Index. Patients are enrolled during routine clinical care and followed prospectively after initiation of hemodialysis combined with hemoadsorption, in accordance with local standard practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) with end-stage kidney disease (CKD stage 5D) on maintenance hemodialysis.
  • Stable hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Presence of at least one moderate-to-severe uremic symptom, as identified by the Dialysis Symptom Index at screening.
  • Planned treatment with hemodialysis combined with hemoadsorption according to local clinical practice.
  • Ability to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute illness, active infection, or hospitalization within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Planned kidney transplantation within the study follow-up period.
  • less than 6 months due to non-renal comorbid conditions.
  • Inability to complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study that could interfere with study outcomes.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • HAHD Registry Cohort

    Adult patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and enrolled in the ICHARUS prospective observational registry. Patients are included based on the presence of persistent uremic symptoms and a clinical decision to use hemodialysis combined with hemoadsorption as part of routine care. All participants are followed longitudinally according to standard clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in uremic symptom burden

    Change in total patient-reported uremic symptom burden, measured by the questionnaire Dialysis Symptom Index (points), from baseline to month 3 after initiation of hemadsorption-assisted haemodialysis.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in serum β2 microglobulin concentration

    Absolute change in serum β2 microglobulin concentration (mg/L) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  2. Relative change in serum β2 microglobulin concentration

    Percent change in serum β2 microglobulin concentration from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

  3. Change in erythropoietin resistance index

    Change in the erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), calculated by dividing the weekly weight-adjusted dose (IU/kg/week) of the drug by the patient's hemoglobin level (g/dL), from baseline to 3 and 6 months. This measure is used to assess how well a patient responds to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

  4. Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events

    The study will evaluate treatment-emergent adverse events recording the total number of events from baseline to 6 months in relation to the total number of participants (%) and classify them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  5. Change in 5 D Itch Scale score

    Change in pruritus score measured by 5 D Itch Scale (points) from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  6. Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale score

    Change in restless legs syndrome severity by measuring the total International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale score (points), from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  7. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score

    The study will evaluate the change in sleep quality by measuring the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score (points), from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Absolute change in serum parathyroid hormone concentration

    The study will evaluate the absolute change in serum parathyroid hormone concentration (pg/mL), from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  2. Relative change in serum parathyroid hormone concentration

    Relative change in serum parathyroid hormone concentration will be assessed as the percent change from baseline compared to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  3. Absolute change in serum indoxyl sulfate concentration

    Absolute change in total serum indoxyl sulfate concentration will be assessed as the difference in indoxyl sulfate levels (µmol/L) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months.

  4. Relative change in serum indoxyl sulfate concentration

    The study will evaluate the relative change in total indoxyl sulfate concentration, measured as a percent change (%) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  5. Absolute change in serum p cresyl sulfate (total fraction)

    Absolute change in total serum p-cresyl sulfate concentration will be assessed as the difference in p-cresyl sulfate levels (µmol/L) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  6. Relative change in serum p cresyl sulfate (total fraction)

    The study will evaluate the relative change in total p-cresyl sulfate concentration, measured as a percent change (%) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months

  7. Absolute change in serum p cresyl sulfate (free fraction)

    Absolute change in free serum p-cresyl sulfate concentration will be assessed as the difference in free p-cresyl sulfate levels (µmol/L) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  8. Relative change in serum p cresyl sulfate (free fraction)

    The study will evaluate the relative change in free p-cresyl sulfate concentration, measured as a percent change (%) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months

  9. Absolute change in serum ICAM 1 concentration

    Absolute change in serum ICAM-1 concentration will be assessed as the difference in serum ICAM-1 levels (ng/mL) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  10. Absolute change in serum VCAM 1 concentration

    Absolute change in serum VCAM-1 concentration will be assessed as the difference in serum VCAM-1 levels (ng/mL) from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months

  11. Change in Malnutrition Inflammation Score

    Nutritional status will be evaluated using the Malnutrition Inflammation Score (points), and change will be assessed by the difference from baseline to 3 and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months

  12. Change in protein-energy wasting score

    Protein-energy wasting will be assessed according to score derived from the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism criteria (points), and change will be defined as the difference from baseline to 1, 3 and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  13. Hospitalization rate

    Hospitalization rate will be assessed as the number of all-cause hospitalizations per patient during the 6-month follow-up period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. Incidence of non-fatal cardiovascular events

    Incidence of non-fatal cardiovascular events will be assessed as the number of non-fatal cardiovascular events recorded during the 6-month follow-up period.

    Time frame: 6 months

  15. Change in health and well-being status by KDQOL-36 score

    Change in health and well-being status measured by KDQOL-36 score (points) will be assessed as the difference in total score from baseline to 3 and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

  16. Change in Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) total score at 6 months

    Change in Dialysis Symptom Index (points) total score will be assessed as the difference from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  17. Change in Dialysis Symptom Index item-specific scores

    Change in patient-reported symptom burden will be assessed as the difference from baseline in item-specific scores (points) on the Dialysis Symptom Index at 3 months after initiation of HA-HD.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

  18. Change in proteomic profile measured by Olink® Q100 platform

    Change in proteomic profile will be assessed as the difference in protein expression levels, measured in NPX (Normalized Protein eXpression) using the Olink® Q100 platform, between baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after initiation of HA-HD.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

  19. Change in doses of supportive dialysis-related medication

    Change in dialysis-related medication will be assessed as the difference of the number of doses from baseline to 3 months in the composite of iron therapy, nutritional supplements, phosphate binders, and active vitamin D or etelcalcetide use.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months.

  20. Change in number of antihypertensive medications

    Change in antihypertensive medication use will be assessed as the difference from baseline in the number of antihypertensive medications prescribed at 1, 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  21. Change in nursing workload score

    Change in the nursing workload dedicated to patient care measured by the Nursing Activities Score (points) from baseline to 1, 3 and 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • S.C.D.U. Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto ARNAS G.Brotzu, Cagliari
    Cagliari, Italy 09100, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — de-identified data, upon reasonable request, after publication

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for up to 5 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Access to de-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be granted to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound research proposal. Proposals will be reviewed by the study steering committee. Data access will require approval of the proposal and the execution of a data-sharing agreement. Data will be shared to achieve the aims of the approved proposal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2026
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
StartActual
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Apr 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07522008
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu
Collaborators
International Renal Research Institute Vicenza
Responsible party
Matteo Floris (M.D. Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit G. Brotzu Hospital of Cagliari - Assistant Professor (tenure-track) University of Cagliari, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 21, 2026

Study contacts

Matteo Floris, MD
Contact
matteo.floris@aob.it
*393207718720
Matteo Marcello, MD
Contact
matteo.marcello@aulss8.veneto.it
Claudio Ronco, MD
study director · International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion