ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07308730PDP-LCUpdated Jan 6, 2026

Pain Diary Use After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of Postoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cholelithiasis and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-06.

Sponsored by Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using a pain diary in the assessment of early postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients will be randomly assigned to a pain diary group or a control group receiving routine pain assessment. Postoperative pain intensity will be measured at predefined time points using standardized pain assessment tools. The study seeks to improve patient participation in postoperative pain evaluation without introducing additional pharmacological interventions.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using a block randomization method.

In the intervention group, postoperative pain assessment is performed using a patient-completed pain diary. The pain diary is developed based on the literature and expert opinions and is introduced to patients during the preoperative period. Patients are instructed on how to complete the pain diary, and pain intensity is recorded at rest and during movement at predefined postoperative time points.

In the control group, postoperative pain assessment is carried out using routine clinical practice with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain assessments are performed at the same postoperative time points as in the intervention group.

Additional pain-related assessments are conducted in both groups during the postoperative period. To minimize contamination between groups, patients in the intervention and control groups are followed in separate hospital rooms. Due to the visible nature of the pain diary, blinding is not feasible in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Daily Pain Assessment
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Pain Diary
03

In context

Cholelithiasis

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholelithiasis; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 142 is above the median of 90 across 135 interventional studies indexed under Cholelithiasis.

Browse Cholelithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Admitted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  2. Scheduled for first-time laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  3. Aged 18 years or older
  4. Able to speak, read, and understand Turkish
  5. Literate
  6. Communicative and cooperative
  7. of 1, 2, or 3
  8. Expected to stay at least 24 hours in the hospital post-surgery
  9. Capable of understanding study instructions
  10. Willing to participate voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prolonged stay in the recovery unit due to extended effects of general anesthesia
  2. Admission to intensive care unit postoperatively
  3. Having chronic pain and receiving treatment for it
  4. Being a cancer patient
  5. Having a writing disability
  6. Inability to communicate
  7. Having cognitive, affective, verbal, visual, or auditory impairments
  8. Diagnosed psychiatric disorders such as anxiety or depression and using related medications
  9. Choosing to withdraw from the study after giving consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
142 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pain Management Intervention Group

    Participants in this group will follow the pain management protocol after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including recording postoperative pain in a pain diary.

    Behavioral: Postoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants in this group will receive standard care after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at scheduled times by nurses and researchers, and recorded accordingly

Interventions

  • BehavioralPostoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

    This pain management protocol is specifically tailored for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and combines both scheduled pharmacological analgesics and non-pharmacological pain control measures. Unlike other studies, it includes daily pain diary monitoring to objectively track patient-reported postoperative pain and recovery outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity and Pain Diary vs. VAS Comparison

    The primary outcome measure involves postoperative pain intensity recorded by patients in the intervention group using a daily pain diary, compared to routine clinical VAS measurements in the control group. Measurements will be taken at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours post-surgery. Additionally, short pain inventories at 24 and 48 hours and VAS-based satisfaction evaluation before discharge will be performed.

    Time frame: During the first 48 hours post-surgery (measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours postoperatively)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 Likert scale (VAS). In the intervention group, patients will record their pain in a daily pain diary at scheduled times, while in the control group, routine clinical VAS measurements will be performed. Additionally, short pain inventories at 24 and 48 hours and VAS-based satisfaction evaluation before discharge will be conducted

    Time frame: During the first 48 hours post-surgery (measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours postoperatively)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The specific individual patient data collected in this study include patient first and last names, signed informed consent forms, socio-demographic information (age, gender, etc.), medical history, and postoperative pain diary data. These data will be used solely for research purposes and shared in accordance with confidentiality principles

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Individual patient data and supporting information will be accessible from the date patients provide informed consent prior to surgery, throughout the data collection period, and for at least 5 years following study completion, stored in accordance with confidentiality principles

Access criteria: Individual patient data and supporting information will be accessible only to the study research team. The research team will have access to patient names, surnames, socio-demographic information, medical history, and pain diary data via a secure, password-protected electronic database. The data will be used solely for study purposes and will not be shared with third parties

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 8 months after the start.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cholelithiasis, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 17, 2025
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
StartActual
Nov 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 30, 2027
Last update
Jan 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07308730
Responsible party
MUHAMMED ASLAN (Graduate Student (MSc) in Surgical Nursing, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Nov 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 6, 2026

Study contacts

Muhammed A ASLAN
Contact
aslanmuhammed282@gmail.com
+905313769110
Gülşah K KÖSE
study director · Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University / Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion