ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07304024CAPD-LOOTUpdated Apr 30, 2026

A Treatment for a Form of Age-Related Central Auditory Processing Disorder Consisting of Clemastine Fumarate Plus Engineered Sound

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Clemastine Fumarate Combined With Engineered Sound and Clemastine Fumarate Combined With Pink Noise in Central Auditory Processing Disorder, Hearing Impaired (Partially) and Hearing, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Dec 2025).
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
344
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of Clemastine Fumarate in the presence of engineered sound to treat age-related central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). This disorder impacts 800M patients worldwide, including \~1/3 people over 40 years of age and \~1/2 people over 65, resulting in an inability to hear in noisy environments.

The primary hypothesis this study aims to test is: engineered sound, driving localized neural circuit activity, will enable Clemastine Fumarate to mature Oligodendrocyte cells and thus remyelinate these activated neural circuits. This Localized Oligodendrocyte Optimization Therapy (LOOT) was highly effective in preclinical animal studies so this clinical trial aims to answer if this therapy will translate to humans.

The study is an adaptive design intended to compare the efficacy of the drug in the presence or absence of the engineered sound for improving hearing in noise ability. Trial participants will be tested for hearing thresholds and ability to isolate a sound signal from background noise. If they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be enrolled into one of the four arms of the study and undergo the proposed one-month treatment (drug and sound or respective placebos). After the treatment period, trial participants will be tested again for hearing thresholds and their ability to isolate s sound source of interest from background noise. The hypothesis to be tested in this clinical trial is that the one-month treatment will significantly improve the participant's ability to isolate a sound source of interest from background noise.

The design has four arms, drug+sound, placebo+sound, drug+white noise, and placebo+white noise. Based on our preclinical data, control arms are all expected to show identical results, thus our adaptive design includes interim analyses to allow for dropping of two of the three placebo arms should the preclinical results be replicated as anticipated.

We will also monitor each participant's general health during the duration of the clinical trial, which will be done by performing a number of blood tests, an EKG and a general physical before and after the one-month treatment period. We expect no significant changes since participants will take the drug for the one-month period at dosages already demonstrated safe in several Phase II studies of multiple sclerosis. Similarly, the engineered sound will be listened to for one hour per day during this month at sound intensities well below threshold that might cause noise-induced hearing damage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Auditory Processing Disorder
  • Hearing Impaired (Partially)
  • Hearing
  • Hearing Abnormality
  • Hearing Disability
  • Hearing Disorder
  • Hearing Disorders
  • Hearing Impairment, Sensorineural
  • Hearing Handicap
  • Hearing Impaired
  • Hearing Impairment
  • Hearing Loss
  • Central Auditory Disease
  • Noise Exposure
  • Noise Induced Hearing Loss
  • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
  • Sound Perception
  • Myelin Degeneration
  • Myelinopathy
  • Myelin Integrity
  • Remyelination
  • Hidden Hearing Loss
  • Cocktail Party Skill
  • Cocktail Party Syndrome
  • CAPD
  • Age Problem

Keywords

  • clemastine fumarate
  • Hidden Hearing Loss
  • Cocktail Party
  • Engineered Sound
  • Sound Therapy
  • central auditory processing disorder
  • Hearing in noise
  • oligodendrocyte
  • Localized Oligodendrocyte Optimization Therapy
  • LOOT
  • CAPD
  • Age-Related Hearing Loss
03

In context

Language Development Disorders

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Language Development Disorders; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 344 is above the median of 74 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Language Development Disorders.

Browse Language Development Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female between 45 and 65 years old (middle aged) at the screening/enrollment visit (Visit 1).
  • Written obtained from the subject and ability for the subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Documentation of no more than a mild high-frequency hearing sensitivity loss and normal middle-ear function will be obtained using standard audiometric equipment with measurements done by an audiologist; Specifically, testing will show:

    • bilateral hearing thresholds \< 20 dB HL at audiometric frequencies from 250 Hz to 4000 Hz inclusively, with no air-bone gaps > 10 dB.
    • symmetrical hearing thresholds between the ears through 8000 Hz, defined as \<20 dB difference at any single audiometric frequency or \< 15 dB difference at 2 or more contiguous frequencies.
    • normal (Type A) tympanograms bilaterally.
  • No cognitive deficit shown upon screening with the (MOCA) test (Nasreddine et al. 2005).
  • Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) showing no more than 20 dB hearing loss at audiometric frequencies from 250 Hz to 4000 Hz.
  • Subjects failing the hearing in noise test at 15 degrees. Failing is defined as SNR being 12 dB below from what is found in normal hearing subjects without central hearing loss.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any subjects who do not fall under the criteria defined above.
  • Any of the following conditions which are listed as or warnings for use of the clinical trial drug (from labeling):

    • Known sensitivity to clemastine fumarate or other antihistamines of similar composition
    • Pregnancy or nursing mother as determined objectively with a urine pregnancy test
    • Lower respiratory tract disease including asthma, or breathing difficulties such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis
    • Glaucoma or increased intraocular pressure
    • Stenosing peptic ulcers or pyloroduodenal obstruction
    • Trouble urinating due to an enlarged prostate gland. Mild urinary issues (Stage 1 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) will not be considered an automatic exclusion but it must be emphasized to patients with this diagnosis that difficulty urinating is a possible side effect that may compound their BPH symptoms.
    • Significant cardiovascular disease, chronic hypertension or hypotension
    • Hyperthyroidism
    • Alcoholism- as defined by consuming on average 3+ drinks per day for women or 4+ drinks per day for men or previous diagnosis of alcohol use disorder by a clinician as defined by DSM V criteria.
    • Patients with a history of seizures will be excluded.
    • Patients with evidence of suicidal ideation/behavior as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
  • We will generally exclude subjects with significant or uncontrolled medical disorders (e.g., hepatic, hematologic, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric disorders). We will define these patients as those who fall outside of normal ranges for a physical examination of vital signs, a 12-lead , and a safety clinical laboratory assessment including complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP). Exclusion with these tests will specifically focus on identifying the following disorders based on the listed criteria:
  • Leukopenia as defined as a CBC white blood cell count \< 4000/ul
  • Anemia as defined by a CBC \<9.0 g/dL or \<10.0 g/dL (Grade 2+ )
  • Lymphopenia as defined by CBC Absolute lymphocyte count \<1000/µL.
  • Neutropenia as defined by CBC ANC \<1500/µL (solid tumors), ANC \<1000/µL (hematologic ). In the case of participants with African, Middle Eastern or West Indian descent a clinician's judgement will be considered to assess the possibility of benign ethnic neutropenia which is not an exclusion criteria.
  • Thrombocytopenia as defined by CBC count \<75000/µL
  • Hepatic Impairment based on CMP: Total >1.5× , /ALT >3× ULN (or >5× ULN if liver ), Alkaline phosphatase >3× ULN.
  • Hepatic Impairment based on CMP: Serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL (alternative threshold).
  • Metabolic abnormalities based on CMP: Albumin \<3.0 g/dL
  • Taking medications that would contraindicate taking the clinical trial drug; Specifically, (from labeling):

    • Monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy
    • CNS depressants (sedatives, tranquilizers, hypnotics)
  • A history of significant otologic disorder such as repetitive ear infections or Meniere's disease
  • A history of significant neurologic disorder, or current neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis, which could present a confound and impact the electrophysiological outcome measures.
  • A history of traumatic brain or closed head injury because this can cause symptoms of central auditory processing problems unrelated to aging and demyelination.
  • English as a second language (non-native English speakers), which is known to negatively impact scores on speech recognition testing.
  • Presence of any other condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator or his co-PIs would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
344 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group

    Active clemastine fumarate + engineered sound stimulation

    Combination Product: Clemastine Fumarate Combined With Engineered Sound

  • Active comparator
    Placebo Sound

    Active clemastine fumarate + placebo sound (white/pink noise)

    Drug: Clemastine Fumarate Combined With Pink Noise

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Drug

    Placebo drug + engineered sound stimulation

    Combination Product: Placebo Drug With Engineered Sound

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group - Double Placebo

    Placebo drug + placebo sound (white/pink noise)

    Combination Product: Placebo - Placebo

Interventions

  • Combination productClemastine Fumarate Combined With Engineered Sound

    Treatment Group: Drug: 16.08 mg clemastine fumarate (8.04 mg in the morning and 8.04 mg in the evening) during the first week of the 30 day treatment period, followed by 10.72 mg clemastine fumarate once daily in the evening for the remainder of the 30 day period. Tablets taken with water in morning and evening with or without food. This dosage corresponds to 12 mg clemastine base daily during the first week followed by 8 mg clemastine base daily for the remainder of the 30 day period. This matches dosing proven safe in previous Phase II multiple sclerosis trials. Sound: This medication will be combined with a proprietary engineered acoustic stimulus designed to activate central auditory processing pathways, delivered via provided headphones for 60 minutes daily during the 30-day treatment period. Sound consists of spatially modulated frequency sweeps targeting neural circuits involved in speech-in-noise processing. Participants instructed to listen during quiet, awake periods.

    Also known as: Localized Oligodendrocyte Optimization Therapy, LOOT

  • DrugClemastine Fumarate Combined With Pink Noise

    Drug page: Clemastine

    Drug and Placebo Sound Group: Drug: 16.08 mg clemastine fumarate (8.04 mg in the morning and 8.04 mg in the evening) during the first week of the 30 day treatment period, followed by 10.72 mg clemastine fumarate once daily in the evening for the remainder of the 30 day period. Tablets taken with water in morning and evening with or without food. This dosage corresponds to 12 mg clemastine base daily during the first week followed by 8 mg clemastine base daily for the remainder of the 30 day period. This matches dosing proven safe in previous Phase II multiple sclerosis trials. Sound: Broadband white noise matched for average intensity to engineered sound. Delivered via provided headphones for 60 minutes daily during the 30-day treatment period. Serves as acoustic control to maintain participant and investigator blinding. Participants instructed to listen during quiet, awake periods.

    Also known as: Dayhist, Tavist

  • Combination productPlacebo Drug With Engineered Sound

    Placebo Drug and Engineered Sound Group: Drug: Matching placebo tablets administered orally twice daily during the first week and once daily for the remainder of the 30 consecutive days. Tablets identical in appearance, taste, and smell to active drug. Taken with water in morning and evening with or without food. Sound: This placebo will be combined with a proprietary engineered acoustic stimulus designed to activate central auditory processing pathways, delivered via provided headphones for 60 minutes daily during the 30-day treatment period. Sound consists of spatially modulated frequency sweeps targeting neural circuits involved in speech-in-noise processing. Participants instructed to listen during quiet, awake periods.

  • Combination productPlacebo - Placebo

    Placebo Drug and Placebo Sound Group: Drug: Matching placebo tablets administered orally twice daily during the first week and once daily for the remainder of the 30 consecutive days. Tablets identical in appearance, taste, and smell to active drug. Taken with water in morning and evening with or without food. Sound: Broadband white noise matched for average intensity to engineered sound. Delivered via provided headphones for 60 minutes daily during the 30-day treatment period. Serves as acoustic control to maintain participant and investigator blinding. Participants instructed to listen during quiet, awake periods.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in hearing-in-noise at 15 degree separation

    Measures ability to understand speech in background noise, tested in a sound chamber with speakers arranged in a circle. Participants listen to sentences spoken by a female speaker while 6-person babble noise plays from a speaker 15 degrees away. Test uses Harvard IEEE sentences (5 keywords each) at 60 dB with varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Participants repeat words they hear. An adaptive procedure determines the SNR needed for 40% accuracy (\>2/5 words correct) and 80% accuracy (\>4/5 words correct). Lower SNR values indicate better performance. Primary outcome is change in SNR from baseline to post-treatment (Day 30). This tests central auditory processing, not peripheral hearing, as it requires the brain to separate speech from noise when sounds come from different directions. Analysis uses linear regression comparing treatment groups to placebo for change in SNR, with p\<0.017 considered significant due to multiple endpoints. Success is group-wise improvement of \>3dB.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

  2. Improvement in hearing-in-noise at 30 degree separation

    Measures ability to understand speech in background noise, tested in a sound chamber with speakers arranged in a circle. Participants listen to sentences spoken by a female speaker while 6-person babble noise plays from a speaker 30 degrees away. Test uses Harvard IEEE sentences (5 keywords each) at 60 dB with varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Participants repeat words they hear. An adaptive procedure determines the SNR needed for 40% accuracy (\>2/5 words correct) and 80% accuracy (\>4/5 words correct). Lower SNR values indicate better performance. Primary outcome is change in SNR from baseline to post-treatment (Day 30). This tests central auditory processing, not peripheral hearing, as it requires the brain to separate speech from noise when sounds come from different directions. Analysis uses linear regression comparing treatment groups to placebo for change in SNR, with p\<0.017 considered significant due to multiple endpoints. Success is group-wise improvement of \>3dB.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Speech, Spatial, and Qualities questionnaire (SSQ)

    Speech, Spatial, and Qualities questionnaire (SSQ) by Gatehouse \& Noble, 2004. Self-report questionnaire assessing speech understanding, spatial hearing, and sound quality in daily life. The evaluation ranges from 0-10 for each item. With higher scores indicating better function.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

  2. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]

    Newman et al., 1996. 25-item questionnaire measuring tinnitus severity and impact on daily life. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater handicap.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

  3. Wave III amplitude of the ABR

    This physiological measurement is not relevant in the participant's daily life, however, changes in ABR waves will give us valuable insights into the mechanisms of the treatment. ABR will be measured via existing predicate devices and/or with FDA cleared EEG devices and standard auditory stimuli appropriate for measuring auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves. This assessment is non-invasive and involves an electrode placed on appropriate locations of a participants head to record electrophysiologic activity while the patient listens to auditory stimuli such as clicking that stimulates the relevant neural circuits.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

Other outcomes

  1. Audiological Safety & Eligibility

    Auditory function assessments will include: Audiogram, and Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) tests. For the audiogram and DPOAE, right, left, and bilateral thresholds will be recorded in the range of 250-8000 Hz. To include subjects or determine if an adverse event (AE) has occured, these measures will verify normal thresholds and symmetrical hearing between the ears. On the bilateral audiogram the normal threshold is \< 21 dB hearing loss in the range of (250-4000 Hz) and no air-bone gaps \>10 dB. Symmetrical hearing will be defined by \<21 dB differences OR any single frequency and \<16 dB difference at 2+ contiguous frequencies. For the DPOAE \<20 dB hearing loss will be defined as normal. Clinician judgement will be used to over-rule exclusion or determination of AE.

    Time frame: At enrollment and again after intervention (Week 5 or 6)

  2. Participant Journal

    A participant journal will be completed during the trial to assess deviations from compliance or other self-reported observations.

    Time frame: Journal entries will be recorded daily during intervention and returned upon final evaluation (Week 5 or 6)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    Recruiting
    • Achim Klug, PhD · Contactachim.klug@cuanschutz.edu · 303-724-4621
    • Samuel Budoff, PhD, MS · Contactsamuel.budoff@CUANSCHUTZ.EDU
    • Achim Klug, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Samuel A Budoff, PhD, MS · Sub investigator
    • Enrique Alvarez, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Yuri Agrawal, MD, MPH · Sub investigator
    • Vinaya Manchaiah, AuD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Green AJ, Gelfand JM, Cree BA, Bevan C, Boscardin WJ, Mei F, Inman J, Arnow S, Devereux M, Abounasr A, Nobuta H, Zhu A, Friessen M, Gerona R, von Budingen HC, Henry RG, Hauser SL, Chan JR. Clemastine fumarate as a remyelinating therapy for multiple sclerosis (ReBUILD): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32346-2. Epub 2017 Oct 10. PubMed 29029896 ↗
  • Mei F, Fancy SPJ, Shen YA, Niu J, Zhao C, Presley B, Miao E, Lee S, Mayoral SR, Redmond SA, Etxeberria A, Xiao L, Franklin RJM, Green A, Hauser SL, Chan JR. Micropillar arrays as a high-throughput screening platform for therapeutics in multiple sclerosis. Nat Med. 2014 Aug;20(8):954-960. doi: 10.1038/nm.3618. Epub 2014 Jul 6. PubMed 24997607 ↗
  • Manousi A, Kury P. Small molecule screening as an approach to encounter inefficient myelin repair. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;61:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6. PubMed 34753035 ↗
  • Schran HF, Petryk L, Chang CT, O'Connor R, Gelbert MB. The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of clemastine and phenylpropanolamine in single-component and combination formulations. J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;36(10):911-22. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04758.x. PubMed 8930778 ↗
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5 Suppl):119S-126S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710001-00010. PubMed 3678650 ↗
  • Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014. PubMed 15035561 ↗
  • Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. doi: 10.1121/1.1784440. PubMed 15532670 ↗
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. PubMed 15817019 ↗
  • Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):143-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007. PubMed 8630207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared due to: (1) proprietary nature of the engineered acoustic intervention which is core intellectual property, (2) potentially small sample size due to potential early stopping creates re-identification risks despite de-identification efforts, and (3) lack of dedicated data sharing infrastructure as an academic investigator led trial. Aggregate results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 40 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2025
First posted
Dec 26, 2025
StartActual
Mar 31, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 2028
Last update
Apr 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07304024
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 26, 2025
Start date
Mar 31, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2026

Study contacts

Ajay Keerthy, BS
Contact
ajay.keerthy@cuanschutz.edu
248-421-5796
Achim Klug, PhD
principal investigator · Colorado University Anschutz Medical Center
Samuel A Budoff, PhD, MS
study director · Colorado University Anschutz Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion