ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07301957RESIRUPTUpdated Jul 1, 2026

Impact of Early Rupture of the Residual Membrane on Latency Before Labour Begins

An interventional study of Additional rupture of the residual membrane in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier le Mans. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier le Mans · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Approximately 25% of patients experience premature rupture of membranes before labour. Of these patients, 82% will give birth within 24 hours and 97% within 48 hours.

Patients who do not go into labour spontaneously will be induced 24 or 48 hours after their membranes rupture, depending on the centre.

During this period, they are hospitalised in the obstetrics department. The presence of a residual membrane appears to prolong the latency period before labour begins and the rate of induction, according to a pilot study conducted by investigator.

No study specifically addresses this topic. The various studies on "Rupture of Membranes Before Labour" assess its frequency of occurrence or the time before considering induction. They also assess the occurrence of maternal-foetal infection. This is no longer of interest today, as antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced maternal-foetal infections.

Investigator would therefore like to assess the impact of additional rupture of the residual membrane upon the patient's admission on the latency before labour and the induction rate (for membrane rupture exceeding 48 hours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

Keywords

  • prelabor rupture of membranes
03

In context

Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is below the median of 150 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture.

Browse Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier le Mans is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women over 18 years of age
  • Single foetal pregnancy, cephalic presentation
  • diagnosis of membrane rupture with persistence of one membrane and absence of immediate spontaneous labour.
  • Person affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patient
  • patient under guardianship/curatorship,
  • multiple pregnancy, pregnancy with foetal death
  • non-cephalic presentation
  • gestational age less than 37 weeks,
  • rupture of membranes more than 12 hours ago
  • to vaginal deliver
  • meconium-stained amniotic fluid,
  • clinical signs suggestive of intrauterine infection (maternal hyperthermia >38°C, maternal and/or foetal tachycardia, purulent amniotic fluid),
  • cervix not accessible for artificial rupture
  • vaginismus
  • contraindication to a potential expectant management
  • indication for induction for another reason
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Additional rupture of the residual membrane

    Rupture of the residual membrane

    Other: Additional rupture of the residual membrane

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    unbroken residual membrane

Interventions

  • OtherAdditional rupture of the residual membrane

    Additional rupture of the residual membrane using a sterile, single-use amniotic membrane piercer such as the Robé device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Latency between the rupture of membranes and the onset of labour

    Latency is evaluated by the time in minutes between the rupture of membranes and the onset of labour. The diagnosis of rupture is the spontaneous loss of fluid through the vagina. The diagnosis of labour is defined by the onset of painful uterine contractions and cervical changes. The time recorded will be when the patient's cervix is 3 cm dilated.

    Time frame: At labour onset (up to 6 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trigger rate for prolonged rupture of membranes

    Trigger rate for prolonged rupture of membranes was evaluated by absence of spontaneous labour 48 hours after the time H0 defined during the initial consultation (rupture of membrane's diagnosis)

    Time frame: 48 hours after rupture of membranes

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 24 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 24, 2025
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
StartActual
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 24, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 24, 2028
Last update
Jul 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07301957
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier le Mans
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
Start date
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 24, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 24, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Christelle JADEAU
Contact
recherchecliniquepromotion@ch-lemans.fr
+33244710204
Marie-Charlotte FAURANT, MD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier le Mans

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion