ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05915663SONGUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Impact of the Choice of Gastric Tube Placement Sites on the Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

An interventional study of nasogastric tube and orogastric tube and orogastric tube and nasogastric tube in Intubated Patient Requiring a Gastric Tube, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier le Mans. Recruiting at 16 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier le Mans · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In intensive care, many gastric tubes are inserted on a regular basis. There are different practices in terms of the location of the gastric tube. In some cases, the tube is inserted through the nose and in others, it is inserted through the mouth.

In the literature and in practice, these gastric tubes create discomfort and complications that have an impact not only on the patient, but also on the treatments and the length of the patient's stay in hospital.

Nosocomial Ventilator Associated Pneumonia is the most serious common complication for patients intubated with a gastric tube. It is possible that placement site may have an impact on the risk of developing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, particularly by increasing the risk of bacterial pullulation opposite the sinuses when the tube is placed via the nasal route.

Investigator hypothesises that placing the gastric tube orally will reduce the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia compared with the nasal route in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intubated Patient Requiring a Gastric Tube

Keywords

  • orogastric tube
  • nasogastric tube
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,400 is above the median of 115 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier le Mans is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient in intensive care, intubated, ventilated
  • Adult
  • Requiring a gastric tube
  • With an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 48 hours
  • Affiliated to social security
  • Patient or relative consent or, failing that, emergency inclusion of the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, breast-feeding or parturient women
  • Patients under legal protection: curatorship and guardianship
  • to placing a gastric tube through the nose or mouth
  • Patients who already have a gastric tube when they enter the service
  • Patient intubated for more than 24 hours
  • Patient intubated via the nasotracheal route
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nasogastric

    nasogastric tube in period 1 and orogastric tube in period 2

    Other: nasogastric tube and orogastric tube

  • Experimental
    Orogastric

    orogastric tube in period 1 and nasogastric tube in period 2

    Other: orogastric tube and nasogastric tube

Interventions

  • Othernasogastric tube and orogastric tube

    nasogastric tube in period 1 and orogastric tube in period 2

  • Otherorogastric tube and nasogastric tube

    orogastric tube in period 1 and nasogastric tube in period 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare impact of insertion site of gastric tube on the incidence of ventilator associated pneumoniae

    The impact is measured by the number of ventilator associated peumonia

    Time frame: Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of attempts before successful insertion or reinsertion confirmed by control according to service protocol

    Time frame: At gastric tube insertion or reinsertion procedure

  2. Pain monitoring (pain scale) during insertion or reinsertion of the gastric tube

    Assessed based on the patient's neurological status : * The Visual Analog Score for pain for vigilant patients (Glasgow score greater than or equal to 12). * The algo plus scale for patients with a Glasgow score below 12 or who are unable to rate their pain. * The Behavioral Pain Scale BPS if the patient is sedated. * If the patient is curarized, there will be no pain monitoring.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  3. Pain monitoring (pain scale) during daily repair of the fixation system of the gastric tube

    Assessed based on the patient's neurological status : * The Visual Analog Score for pain for vigilant patients (Glasgow score greater than or equal to 12). * The algo plus scale for patients with a Glasgow score below 12 or who are unable to rate their pain. * The Behavioral Pain Scale BPS if the patient is sedated. * If the patient is curarized, there will be no pain monitoring.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  4. Absence or presence of skin lesions qualified by location and according to the NPUAP classification of pressure ulcer stages

    NPUAP classification of pressure ulcer stages : * Stage 1: erythema that does not disappear with pressure. * Stage 2: de-epidermalization (Epidermal loss). * Stade 3: necrosis. * Stage 4: Deep-tissue involvement.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  5. Absence or presence and qualification of nasal discharge

    Qualification according to the following four criteria: * No flow. * Serous discharge. * Bloody discharge. * Purulent discharge.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  6. Presence of bleeding during gastric tube insertion or reinsertion

    Presence of bleeding during insertion or reinsertion, requiring a change in the course of treatment (bloody buccal aspirations - or IOT-related trauma -compression, packing, change of insertion site, endoscopic haemostasis, Blakemore probe insertion, therapeutic modification, etc.).

    Time frame: At gastric tube insertion or reinsertion procedure

  7. Presence of diagnosed and treated ulcer and/or diagnosed and treated esophagitis

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  8. Morbidity

    Duration of artificial ventilation and length of stay in intensive care unit.

    Time frame: From admission to discharge from the intensive care unit

  9. Mortality

    Mortality in intensive care unit and Mortality at D28.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

  10. Number and type of adverse events

    Nature of adverse events can be : * Ablation * Mobilization of probe * Plicature of probe * Probe obstruction * Coiling of probe * False path.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

07

Study locations

16 of 16 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Saletes J, Guitton C, Valleroy J, Guillarme S, Haubertin C, Paris G, Muller L, Rousseau C, Gamon P, L'Hotellier S, Forel JM, Roussel C, Garin A, Morand C, Maury E, Mangeard N, Menard L, Arnaud PY, Lejeune A, Rouanet E, Callahan JC. Effect of nasogastric versus orogastric tube placement on ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a cluster randomised crossover trial in 16 intensive care units in France (SONG trial). BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e099840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099840. PubMed 40921641 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05915663
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier le Mans
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 23, 2023
Start date
Nov 7, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 7, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 7, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Christelle JADEAU
Contact
cjadeau@ch-lemans.fr
+33244710781
Josselin SALETES
Contact
jsaletes@ch-lemans.fr
+33 2 55 46 34 55

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion