ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07274254LidoVOCUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Lidocaine for Opioid Sparing in Vaso-occlusive Crisis of Sickle Cell Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lidocain and Placebo in Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 12 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Primary conditionVaso-Occlusive CrisesRegistry: Anemia, Sickle CellReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anemia, Sickle Cell — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Vaso-Occlusive Crises
Why
  1. The study's title name Vaso-Occlusive Crises, a narrower term within Anemia, Sickle Cell.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether adding lidocaine to standard of care in pain management during severe vaso-occlusive crisis has an effect on the cumulative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalent.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sickle Cell disease
  • Sickle Cell Syndrome
  • Vaso-occlusive crisis
  • Acute Chest Syndrome
  • Painful crisis
  • Pain management
  • Opioid sparing
  • Lidocaine
03

In context

Vaso-Occlusive Crises Reclassified

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Vaso-Occlusive Crises; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 104 is above the median of 81 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Vaso-Occlusive Crises.

Browse Vaso-Occlusive Crises studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Compared within Vaso-Occlusive Crises, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anemia, Sickle Cell. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 18 years
  • Known sickle cell disease with an SS, SC, Sβ, or Sβ+ genotype
  • Patient admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis and/or ACS as the main reason for admission:

    • Vaso-Occlusive Crisis defined by acute pain or tenderness, affecting at least one part of the body, including limbs, ribs, sternum, head (skull), spine, and/or pelvis, not attributable to other causes
    • Acute Chest Syndrome defined by the association of clinical respiratory sign(s): dyspnea and/or chest pain and/or auscultatory abnormality (crepitants and/or bronchial breathing) with a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest X-ray, thoracic CT-scan, or lung ultrasound.
  • Treatment with parenteral morphine or oxycodone started less than 72 hours prior to inclusion
  • Patient or next of kin informed about the study and having consented to the participation of the patient in the study. If patient is no competent and no next of kin can be contacted during screening for the study, trial inclusion will be completed as an emergency procedure by the Intensive Care Unit physician, in compliance with French law.
  • French speaking
  • Patient with health care insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women or nursing mothers; Women of child bearing potential will be tested for pregnancy before inclusion
  • Patients under guardianship, curatorship or under legal protection
  • Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated
  • Sickle Cell Disease acute complication other than Vaso-Occlusive Crisis or Acute Chest Syndrome as the main reason for admission:

priapism, stroke, acute splenic sequestration, acute hepatic sequestration, bone marrow necrosis…

  • Patients wearing a lidocaine-medicated plaster at the time of screening for inclusion
  • Known or assumed to lidocaine hydrochloride, other local anaesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine or ropivacaine) or an
  • Patients treated with anti-arhythmic drugs known to induce torsade de pointe.
  • Patients on chronic or occasional treatment with drugs that interact with the 3A cytochrome isoenzymes () and/or 1A2 cytochrome isoenzymes (CYP1A2)
  • Patients with recurrent porphyria, porphyria in remission, or known asymptomatic carriage of gene mutations responsible for porphyria
  • Epileptic patients
  • Hypovolemic shock or shock of other cause at screening for inclusion
  • Known atrioventricular block, or other heart conduction disorder or heart failure
  • Chronic respiratory failure with long term non invasive ventilation (excluding Continuous Positive Air way pressure), or long term oxygen therapy at home
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome according to The 2012 Berlin definition
  • Acute or Chronic liver failure with MELD > 19
  • Acute or Chronic kidney failure with clearance \<30mL/min/m2 according to
  • Body weight \<40kg and >120kg
  • Prior inclusion in the study in the last 3 months
  • Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Altered consciousness with Glasgow coma scale \<13
  • Patient already included in a clinical drug
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group: Lidocaine + standard of care

    Lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg/mL, solution, 20 mL ampoule for intravenous administration Administration : parenteral route on peripheral or central venous catheter. * Bolus of 1.5 mg/kg bolus during 30 minutes, with a maximum dose of 180 mg (18mL) * Immediately followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h (max 120mg/h =- 12mL/h) during 72 hours.

    Drug: Lidocain · Drug: Standard of care

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group: placebo + standard of care

    Placebo is 20 mL ampoules of sodium chloride (NaCl 0.9%) for injection. Administration : parenteral route on peripheral or central venous catheter. * Bolus of 1.5 mg/kg bolus during 30 minutes, with a maxium dose of 180 mg (18mL) * Immediately followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h (max 120mg/h = 12mL/h) during 72 hours.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Standard of care

Interventions

  • Lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg/mL, solution, 20 mL ampoule for IV administration (25 ampoules) Administration : parenteral route on peripheral or central venous catheter. - Bolus of 1.5 mg/kg bolus dur

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo is 20 mL ampoules of sodium chloride (NaCl 0.9%) for injection Administration : parenteral route on peripheral or central venous catheter. * Bolus of 1.5 mg/kg bolus during 30 minutes, with a maxium dose of 180 mg (18mL) * Immediately followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h (max 120mg/h = 12mL/h) during 72 hours.

  • DrugStandard of care

    Standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative parenteral opioid dose between randomization and discharge from the intensive care unit expressed in morphine milligram equivalent.

    To determine whether adding lidocaine to the standard of care in pain during severe vaso-occlusive crisis has an effect on the cumulative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalent (MME)

    Time frame: up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensive Care Unit length of stay

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  2. hospital length of stay

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  3. Visual analogue pain Scale score during Intensive Care Unit stay

    Compare between groups the pain intensity as evaluated using a Visual Analogue pain Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very intense pain).

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  4. Categorical Pain Score during Intensive Care Unit stay

    Compare between groups the pain intensity as evaluated using Categorical Pain Score (CPS)

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  5. Time of resolution of severe vaso-occlusive crisis

    presence of at least three of the following four criteria: * continuous apyrexia for the last 8 hours, * no need for intravenous opioid infusion for the last 8 hours, * ability to walk or move without pain, * absence of spontaneous pain with a CPS ≤1

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  6. time to last parenteral opioid dose

    Time from randomisation to the last parenteral opioid dose

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  7. vaso-occlusive crisis complications during Intensive Care Unit stay

    secondary acute chest syndrome

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  8. vaso-occlusive crisis complications during Intensive Care Unit stay

    need for blood transfusion

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  9. vaso-occlusive crisis complications during Intensive Care Unit stay

    need for red blood cell exchange

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  10. vaso-occlusive crisis complications during Intensive Care Unit stay

    need for life-supporting therapies defined as invasive mechanical ventilation or dialysis or vasopressor support

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  11. quality of life with reduced impact of Sickle Cell Disease on health

    Score of French version of Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me). It is a patient-reported outcome measurement system with a 39 items questionnaire, assessing several aspects of SCD impact on general health state. For the present study, the questionnaires regarding emotional impact, pain episodes, pain impact, Social Functionning will be used.

    Time frame: At Day 28

  12. safety profile of lidocaine infusion

    Compare between groups safety profile of lidocaine infusion at D28

    Time frame: at 28 days

  13. Rate of readmission for vaso-occlusive crisis after Intensive Care Unit discharge

    Frequency of any adverse events and frequency of serious adverse events

    Time frame: At day 28

  14. Assess the economic efficiency of lidocaine added to standard of care compared to standard of care alone

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year, QALY) comparing lidocaine + standard of care (SOC) to SOC alone

    Time frame: At day 28

07

Study locations

12 of 12 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07274254
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
Start date
Jul 3, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 3, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 3, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Maïté AGBAKOU
Contact
maite.agbakou@chu-nantes.fr
02.44.76.80.54 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion