CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07188766FLASCUpdated Mar 18, 2026

Efficacy of Liberal Versus Restricted IV Fluid Approach in the Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

An interventional study of Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 % and Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 % in SCD and Vaso Occlussive Crisis, sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
394
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent inherited blood disorder characterized by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), which lead to severe pain and complications. Despite hydration being a cornerstone of VOC management, the optimal fluid strategy remains uncertain. This study evaluates restrictive versus liberal fluid management strategies in patients with acute VOC.

This multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority RCT will enroll patients with SCD presenting with acute VOC. Participants will be randomized to either a restrictive or liberal intravenous fluid management protocol. Primary outcome is pain score reduction. Secondary outcomes include time to pain resolution, ED length of stay, hospital admission rate, cumulative opioid dose, adverse events (incidence of fluid overload, pulmonary congestion), acute chest syndrome, incidence of acute kidney injury, revisit rates within 72 hours of ED discharge, need for intensive care or high-dependency unit admission, need for additional interventions, and 28 days overall mortality. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles.

We hypothesize that a restrictive fluid strategy will achieve non-inferior pain control compared to a liberal strategy, while minimizing fluid-related complications. This study will provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines for fluid management in SCD patients experiencing VOCs.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, non-inferiority, open-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the emergency departments (EDs) of tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The primary objective is to compare two fluid management strategies- restrictive (intervention) vs. liberal (control) in adult sickle cell disease (SCD) patients hospitalized for VOC. The study evaluates whether a restrictive fluid approach is non-inferior to a liberal strategy in terms of pain resolution, hospitalization duration, and other clinical outcomes.

Patients will be randomized upon ED admission, and their assigned fluid regimen will be administered within the first hour. Clinical teams will monitor outcomes throughout hospitalization or up to 28 days post-enrollment.

Study Population

  1. Recruitment Screening: All patients admitted to the ED with VOC will be screened for eligibility.

    Consent Model: A priori informed written consent will be obtained from conscious, coherent patients or substitute decision-makers.

  2. Inclusion Criteria Age >18 years with confirmed SCD diagnosis.

    Presenting with VOC requiring hospitalization.

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) >5

    Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

  3. Exclusion Criteria Requiring specialized IVF management per the physician's discretion.

Cardiac/Renal Conditions:

Congestive heart failure (CHF) or symptomatic systolic heart failure.

Patients with ESRD on chronic dialysis.

Hemodynamic Instability:

Shock (SBP \<100 mmHg or MAP \<65) with hypoperfusion signs.

Other Exclusions:

Known/suspected pregnancy.

Prior enrollment in this trial within the last 30 days.

Concurrent enrollment in another trial affecting fluid management.

Inability to obtain IV access.

Trial Intervention

  1. Screening \& Randomization Screening occurs upon ED admission; evaluations must precede randomization.

    A screening log will track eligible vs. randomized patients.

  2. Informed Consent An a priori consent model is used due to the conscious-coherent state of most SCD patients in VOC.

    Efforts will be made to obtain consent immediately from the patient or surrogate.

  3. Intervention Arms A. Intervention (Restrictive)Keep-vein-open (KVO) rate only (minimal fluids to maintain IV patency). No additional IV fluids administered.

B. Control (Liberal) 20 mL/kg IV bolus (NS or LR over 1 hour) + maintenance fluids (1.5-2 mL/kg/day).

Initiation: Both regimens starts within 1 hour of ED admission and continue until ED discharge.

Hospitalized Patients:

Pain scores (NPRS) recorded at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Total fluid intake documented at hospital discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • SCD
  • Vaso Occlussive Crisis

Keywords

  • sickle cell disease
  • sickle cell crisis
  • intravenous fluid
  • emergency department
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients >18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of SCD.
  2. Presenting with a VOC.
  3. NPRS >5
  4. Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient requiring specialized IVF management as per the treating physician discretion.
  2. Patients with congestive heart failure, and /or acute or chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure
  3. Patients with ESRD on chronic dialysis
  4. Patients with signs of shock (low SBP \<100 or MAP \< 65) and signs of hypo perfusion
  5. Known or suspected pregnancy
  6. Previously enrolled in this trial within the last 30 days
  7. Enrolled in another trial study that interfered with fluid management
  8. Unable to obtain IV access.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
394 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Restricted approach group

    Patients in this arm will receive maintenance intravenous fluids at a keep-vein-open (KVO) rate and no extra intravenous fluids is administered

    Drug: Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

  • Active comparator
    Liberal Approach Group

    Patients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements

    Drug: Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

Interventions

  • DrugSodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

    Keep vein open rate

    Also known as: Restricted

  • DrugSodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %

    IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements

    Also known as: Liberal

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain intensity

    Measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Time frame: Baseline (within 30 minutes post admission), 1 hour, then hourly until ED discharge or 24- 48- and 72-hours post-admission ( for admitted patients)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to pain resolution

    NPRS score of ≤5

    Time frame: up to 4 hours

  2. ED length of stay

    time elapsed from ED admission to ED discharge or admit to the wards

    Time frame: at least 4 hours

  3. Hospital admission rate

    Proportion of participants requiring inpatient admission

    Time frame: within 24 hours of ED admission

  4. Cumulative Opioid Dose

    Total opioid consumption during acute VOC episode

    Time frame: up to 4 hours

  5. Revisit Rates

    Percentage of patients who revisited the emergency department

    Time frame: within 72 hours post ED discharge

  6. Overall Mortality

    number of patients who died

    Time frame: within 28 days post-enrollment

  7. Adverse events

    total number of patients who encountered allergic reactions, respiratory distress, pulmonary edema, and acute chest syndrome, development of tachypnea, hypoxia, cough, crackles on auscultation, elevated BP, need for respiratory support, heart failure (worsening of tachycardia, hepatomegaly, peripheral edema, and allergic reactions (urticaria, angioedema, hypotension, wheezing)

    Time frame: up to 7 days

06

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • King Fahd Hospital of the University
    Dammam, Eastern Province 31952, Saudi Arabia
    • Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD · Contact · msshahrani@iau.edu.sa · +966556966663
    • Laila P Asonto, RN · Contact · lasonto@iau.edu.sa · +966554586033
    • Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD · Principal investigator
    • Khalid Alamer, MD · Sub investigator
    • Laila P Asonto, RN · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • King Saud University Medical City
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Puri L, Nottage KA, Hankins JS, Anghelescu DL. State of the Art Management of Acute Vaso-occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease. Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Feb;20(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0263-z. PubMed 28853040 ↗
  • Rizio AA, Bhor M, Lin X, McCausland KL, White MK, Paulose J, Nandal S, Halloway RI, Bronte-Hall L. The relationship between frequency and severity of vaso-occlusive crises and health-related quality of life and work productivity in adults with sickle cell disease. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1533-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02412-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13. PubMed 31933113 ↗
  • Okomo U, Meremikwu MM. Fluid replacement therapy for acute episodes of pain in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 12;(3):CD005406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005406.pub4. PubMed 25764071 ↗
  • Brandow AM, Carroll CP, Creary S, Edwards-Elliott R, Glassberg J, Hurley RW, Kutlar A, Seisa M, Stinson J, Strouse JJ, Yusuf F, Zempsky W, Lang E. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2656-2701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851. PubMed 32559294 ↗
  • Rosa RM, Bierer BE, Thomas R, Stoff JS, Kruskall M, Robinson S, Bunn HF, Epstein FH. A study of induced hyponatremia in the prevention and treatment of sickle-cell crisis. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 13;303(20):1138-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011133032002. PubMed 6999348 ↗
  • GBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Aug;10(8):e585-e599. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00118-7. Epub 2023 Jun 15. PubMed 37331373 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — 1. Demographics: Age, sex, and other baseline characteristics. 2. Outcome Measures: primary and secondary outcomes of the trial. 3. Adverse Events: Data on side effects or other adverse events participants experienced during the trial. 4. Treatment Allocations: Information on which participants were assigned to each treatment group.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07188766
Lead sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Responsible party
Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani (Consultant, Emergency and Critical Care Departments, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2025
Start date
Oct 5, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD
Contact
msshahrani@iau.edu.sa
+966556966663
Laila Perlas Asonto, RN
Contact
lasonto@iau.edu.sa
Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD
principal investigator · King Fahd Hospital of the University- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion