ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07270939Updated Dec 8, 2025

Optimizing Enteral Nutrition Regimen for Critically Ill Patients

An interventional study of 20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window and 18-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 6-Hour Fasting Window in Critical Illness, Enteral Nutrition and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, sponsored by Hamad Medical Corporation. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Primary conditionPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedRegistry: Critical IllnessReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Critical Illness — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
Why
  1. Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Hamad Medical Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinical Trial The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether different enteral feeding cycles (18-hour, 20-hour, or standard 24-hour continuous feeding) improve outcomes for critically ill ICU patients who need tube feeding. It will also look at tolerance, nutrition delivery, and safety.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do shorter feeding cycles (with fasting windows) reduce ICU length of stay?

Do they lower the risk of infections like ventilator-associated pneumonia?

How do they affect calorie delivery, blood sugar control, and gastrointestinal tolerance?

Researchers will compare:

Continuous 24-hour feeding (standard care)

20-hour feeding with a 4-hour fasting window

18-hour feeding with a 6-hour fasting window

Participants will:

Be critically ill adults in the ICU who require at least 7 days of enteral feeding

Be randomized to one of the three feeding schedules

Receive daily monitoring of calories, protein, blood sugar, and GI tolerance

Have outcomes measured, including ICU length of stay, infections, metabolic control, and feeding tolerance

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will compare three enteral feeding regimens in critically ill ICU patients: standard 24-hour continuous feeding, 20-hour cycled feeding with a 4-hour fasting window, and 18-hour cycled feeding with a 6-hour fasting window. The rationale is that continuous feeding may impair metabolic regulation, increase insulin requirements, and contribute to gastrointestinal intolerance, while cycled feeding could better align with circadian rhythms, support metabolic balance, and reduce complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Approximately 150 adult patients who require enteral nutrition for at least seven days will be enrolled across Hamad Medical Corporation ICUs. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using block randomization through REDCap to ensure allocation concealment. All groups will receive isocaloric enteral nutrition through nasogastric or orogastric tubes, with caloric and protein targets guided by indirect calorimetry or weight-based calculations.

Feeding plans will be initiated within 24 hours of ICU admission or stabilization. Patients assigned to the 18-hour and 20-hour arms will have structured fasting periods, while the control group will receive uninterrupted feeding. Daily assessments will capture nutritional delivery, gastrointestinal tolerance, and metabolic parameters, along with safety monitoring for adverse events. Data will be collected electronically via REDCap, de-identified, and audited regularly by the Clinical Trial Unit.

The study is designed to generate high-quality evidence on whether incorporating fasting windows into feeding schedules can optimize nutrition therapy, improve tolerance, reduce ICU stays, and minimize complications. Findings are expected to inform future ICU nutrition guidelines and contribute to the global discussion on intermittent versus continuous feeding practices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Enteral Nutrition
  • Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
  • Hyperglycemia
  • Feeding Intolerance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cyclic feeding
  • Feeding window
  • Critical care nutrition
  • Gastrointestinal tolerance
  • Nutritional adequacy
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated Reclassified

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 115 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Hamad Medical Corporation is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Critical Illness. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:

  1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
  2. Patients expected to require enteral nutrition (EN) for ≥ 7 days.
  3. Critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.
  4. New patients initiating EN in the critical care unit.
  5. Patients receiving EN via:

    • a nasogastric (NG) tube.
    • orogastric (OG) feeding tube.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with to enteral feeding or pre-existing gastrointestinal disorders, including:

    • Active GI bleeding.
    • Progressive GI disease.
    • Recent GI tract resection.
  2. Indication for a special diet formula.
  3. Need for a large volume of feeding (as determined by the clinical team).
  4. Pre-existing hepatic failure.
  5. Use of a nasojejunal tube, gastrostomy, or jejunostomy.
  6. Pregnancy confirmed via β-hCG testing for women of .
  7. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    24-hour continuous feeding (control)

    Feeding Schedule provides continuous enteral nutrition over 24 hours with no fasting window. This standard care in many ICUs serves as the baseline for comparison with two experimental cycled feeding regimens. The feeding rate is designed to evenly deliver the total daily caloric goal across the entire period.

  • Active comparator
    20-hour cycled feeding (intervention)

    Feeding Schedule consists of enteral nutrition delivered over 20 hours, with a structured 4-hour fasting window each day. This approach aims to balance metabolic and gastrointestinal benefits while ensuring adequate daily caloric intake. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet the total caloric goal within the shorter feeding period.

    Behavioral: 20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window

  • Active comparator
    18-hour cycled feeding (intervention)

    Feeding Schedule involves enteral nutrition over an 18-hour period while incorporating a 6-hour fasting window in each 24-hour cycle. This structure is designed to test a more intense intermittent fasting regimen, aiming to enhance physiological benefits by better aligning with circadian rhythms. The expectations include improved metabolic control, enhanced gastrointestinal motility, and reduced infection rates, with careful monitoring for reduced caloric intake risk. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet daily caloric goals within the 18-hour timeframe, resulting in the most intensive feeding schedule among the three examined arms.

    Behavioral: 18-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 6-Hour Fasting Window

Interventions

  • Behavioral20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window

    20-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 4-Hour Fasting Window (Intervention 1) Objective: To evaluate the physiological benefits of a structured daily fasting period while maintaining a conservative approach to caloric delivery.

    Also known as: Group Intervention 1

  • Behavioral18-Hour Cycled Enteral Nutrition with a 6-Hour Fasting Window

    Feeding Schedule involves enteral nutrition over an 18-hour period while incorporating a 6-hour fasting window in each 24-hour cycle. This structure is designed to test a more intense intermittent fasting regimen, aiming to enhance physiological benefits by better aligning with circadian rhythms. The expectations include improved metabolic control, enhanced gastrointestinal motility, and reduced infection rates, with careful monitoring for reduced caloric intake risk. Consequently, the feeding rate is increased to meet daily caloric goals within the 18-hour timeframe, resulting in the most intensive feeding schedule among the three examined arms.

    Also known as: Group Intervention 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ICU Length of Stay (LOS)

    The total number of days a patient spends in the intensive care unit, calculated from the date of ICU admission to the date of discharge or transfer out of the ICU.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge or transfer, assessed up to 90 days (or until hospital discharge if it occurs earlier).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nosocomial Infection/Pneumonia Incidence

    Infections acquired after 48 hours of hospital admission, specifically including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP). Diagnosed based on CDC criteria (clinical signs, laboratory findings, and imaging).

    Time frame: Assessed daily from Day 3 to Day 7.

  2. Nutritional Adequacy

    The percentage of the prescribed daily caloric goal that is actually delivered to the patient.

    Time frame: Calculated daily from Day 1 to Day 7

  3. Gastrointestinal Complications

    Adverse events related to feeding intolerance.

    Time frame: Monitored daily from Day 1 to Day 7

  4. Gastric Emptying Index

    A measure of gastrointestinal motility, indicated by delayed gastric emptying. Aspirate gastric contents via a nasogastric (NG) or orogastric (OG) tube at regular intervals (every 4 hours). gastric residual volume ≤ 500 mL, persistently high GRV (\>500 mL) indicates delayed emptying.

    Time frame: Measured every 4 hours, daily from Day 1 to Day 7.

  5. Glycemic Control

    The regulation of blood glucose levels during the enteral nutrition intervention period.Average daily blood glucose level (mmol/L or mg/dL), calculated from point-of-care testing performed throughout the day.

    Time frame: Daily, from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention.

  6. Insulin Requirement

    The total daily exogenous insulin dose required to maintain blood glucose within target range.Total insulin dose administered per 24-hour period, measured in units.

    Time frame: Daily, from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention.

  7. Serum Creatinine level, measured in mg/dL (or µmol/L)

    The change in serum creatinine concentration from baseline serves as a specific biomarker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and kidney function.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7. The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

  8. Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) level, measured in mg/dL (or mmol/L)

    Change in blood urea nitrogen concentration from baseline, as a biomarker of nitrogenous waste accumulation influenced by renal function, protein catabolism, and hydration status.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention. The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

  9. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) level, measured in U/L

    The change in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentration from baseline serves as a specific biomarker of hepatocellular injury.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention. The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

  10. Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) level, measured in U/L

    Change in serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentration from baseline, as a biomarker of hepatic inflammation and injury.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention. The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

  11. Total Bilirubin level, measured in mg/dL (or µmol/L)

    The change in serum total bilirubin concentration from baseline serves as a biomarker of hepatic excretory function and bile flow.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7 of the intervention. The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

Other outcomes

  1. Inflammatory Marker

    Level of systemic inflammation by Inflammatory Markers (e.g., CRP)

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7.The baseline value is recorded on Day 0.

  2. Patient Tolerance

    The ability to receive enteral nutrition without significant adverse effects.

    Time frame: Measured daily from Day 1 to Day 7

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be collected and de-identified, codes will be used to cover patient identifiers such as Name, HC no., DOB. Any link between code and identifier will be deleted at the end of the data collection and anonymized data will be kept for at least 5 years after study completion. Study participation is documented using a unique study ID (e.g., "EN-001") rather than patient names. Access to identifiers is restricted to the research team and audited by the clinical trial unit (CTU) in HMC. The data that will be collected for this study will remain confidential.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07270939
Responsible party
Mr.Mutaz Ibrahim Omar Othman (Charge Nurse, Hamad Medical Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2025
Start date
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion