ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06743529POSTPONEUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Immediate Versus Substantiated Antibiotic Therapy in Suspected Non-Severe Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

An interventional study of control group and Conservative strategy in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 42 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
686
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the leading nosocomial infection in the intensive care units, and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and overuse of antibiotics. Initiating antibiotic therapy immediately after bacteriological sampling (immediate strategy) may expose uninfected patients to unnecessary treatment, while waiting for bacteriological confirmation (conservative strategy) may delay ventilator-associated pneumonia in infected patients.

The decision to start antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia takes three points into account: diagnostic probability, the risks to the patient if Antibiotic Therapy is delayed, and the risk of selection of resistant bacteria. Diagnostic probability is limited, given the subjective and non-specific nature of the diagnostic criteria, and only 30-50% of suspected cases are confirmed bacteriologically (whereas samples are only taken when the pre-test probability is sufficient). The risks associated with delayed antibiotic therapy are unknown, as few observational studies have directly assessed the impact of the timing of Antibiotic Therapy initiation on outcome (frequent confusion between delayed and inappropriate Antibiotic Therapy).

Iregui et al. found that delaying Antibiotic Therapy by more than 24 hours was associated with higher mortality. However, more recent before-and-after studies have shown that the conservative strategy was associated with lower mortality, more frequently appropriate initial Antibiotic Therapy and shorter duration of Antibiotic Therapy. Similarly, in a recent before-and-after study by our team, initiating antibiotic therapy only upon microbiological confirmation of ventilator-associated pneumonia without septic shock or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome was not associated with an increase in ventilation time, length of stay or excess mortality at D28; but was associated with antibiotic therapy that was more often appropriate (DELAVAP, MARTIN et al, Annals of Intensive Care, 2024). Finally, the recent multicenter TARPP pilot study in surgical intensive care suggests that antibiotic therapy initiated on the basis of microbiological data in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia not requiring vasopressor support is not associated with a poorer outcome than immediate antibiotic therapy without documentation (the only randomized study on this subject).

Antibiotic Therapy for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia that is not subsequently confirmed is an unnecessary use of antibiotics and carries a risk of selection of resistant bacteria, with adverse effects on public health. It has been reported that a conservative Antibiotic Therapy prescription strategy for intensive care units -acquired infections reduces Antibiotic Therapy use and the incidence of acquired β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.

Overall, in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia but no signs of clinical severity, given the uncertainty about attributable mortality and concerns about bacterial resistance, the evaluation of the conservative Antibiotic Therapy strategy is reasonable. Some French intensive care units already delay Antibiotic Therapy until confirmation of ventilator-associated pneumonia, except in patients with severe hypoxemia or the need for vasopressor support.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Keywords

  • Intensive care medicine
  • Intensive care
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • antibiotic sparing
03

In context

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 686 is above the median of 115 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated.

Browse Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours
  • Respiratory sample collection taken less than two hours ago (at physician discretion, according to local protocol) for a first episode of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (meeting the following prespecified criteria) :

    • new or changing chest X-ray infiltrates
    • plus at least two of the following:

      • body temperature ≥38°C or ≤35.5°C,
      • blood leukocyte count >12 000/µL or \<4000/µL,
      • purulent tracheobronchial aspirate.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • from the patient or next of kin to participation in the trial, or emergency procedure if no next of kin is available
  • Patients affiliated to a social security system

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria for severe ventilator-associated pneumonia defined as:

    • Vasopressor therapy for onset of septic shock around the time of ventilator-associated pneumonia suspicion
    • Onset or severe worsening of hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2\<150 with 60% FiO2 and 10 mm H2O peak expiratory pressure, or patient on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation)
  • defined as :

    • leukocytes \<1G/L or neutrophils \<0,5 G/L
    • within the last 3 months
    • hematopoietic stem-cell transplant or organ transplant with chronic immunosuppressant therapy
    • infection with CD4\<50/mm3
    • chronic use (>0.5 mg/kg day for at least one month within the last three months).
  • Patient already on Antibiotic Therapy of predicted duration ≥4 weeks (endocarditis, spondylodiscitis, abscess...)
  • Previous ventilator-associated pneumonia suspicion with sampling and/or Antibiotic Therapy for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia
  • Previous inclusion in the trial
  • Patient included in an interventional study on ventilator-associated pneumonia management with the same primary endpoint.
  • Pregnancy, recent delivery, or breastfeeding
  • Correctional facility inmate, adult under guardianship
  • Patient under legal protection
  • less than 48 h and/or decision not to treat potential pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation in the context of limiting/discontinuing treatment.
  • Organ donor reanimation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
686 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Immediate strategy

    Usual Care

    Procedure: control group

  • Experimental
    Conservative strategy

    Conservative strategy

    Procedure: Conservative strategy

Interventions

  • Procedurecontrol group

    immediate empiric Antibiotic Therapy (started within 1 hour after randomization) with antibiotic(s) chosen by the bedside physician based on time of ventilator-associated pneumoniaoccurrence, risk of antimicrobial resistance, local ecology, and local protocol. If the respiratory samples are negative, Antibiotic Therapy will be stopped. If ventilator-associated pneumonia is confirmed by positive samples, Antibiotic Therapy active against the recovered bacterial specie(s) will be given for a total of 7 days.

  • ProcedureConservative strategy

    No Antibiotic Therapy until receipt of the respiratory sample culture and/or polymerase chain reaction results. If these results are negative, no Antibiotic Therapy is given. If they are positive (confirmed ventilator-associated pneumonia), Antibiotic Therapy is started as appropriate for the bacterial specie(s) detected by culture and/or polymerase chain reaction, without considering gram-stain results and without waiting for antimicrobial susceptibility testing results, and continued for a total of 7 days of Antibiotic Therapy active against the identified bacterial specie(s).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients who die whithin 28 days or are still on invasive mechanical ventilation on day 28

    To assess, in intensive care units patients with suspected nonsevere ventilator-associated pneumonia (no septic shock or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome), whether delaying antibiotic therapy until ventilator-associated pneumonia is confirmed by a positive respiratory-sample culture and/or polymerase chain reaction test (conservative strategy) neither increases day-28 mortality nor prolongs invasive mechanical ventilation , compared to antibiotic therapy initiation immediately after sampling (immediate strategy).

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

    Daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 7

  2. Modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS)

    Daily mcPIS

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 7

  3. Clinical cure

    Clinical cure is defined as the combination of resolution of signs and symptoms present at enrollment, and improvement or lack of progression of radiological signs

    Time frame: day 7

  4. Invasive mechanical ventilation duration

    Days of invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  5. Ventilator free days

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  6. Use of vasopressors

    Days on vasopressors

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  7. Use of renal replacement therapy

    Days on renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  8. Mortality rates

    ICU discharge mortality rates

    Time frame: ICU discharge, an average of 10 days

  9. Mortality rates

    Mortality rates at day 28

    Time frame: day 28

  10. Mortality rates

    Mortality rates at day 90

    Time frame: day 90

  11. Mortality rates

    Mortality rates at hospital discharge

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, an average of 20 days

  12. ICU stay lenghts

    ICU stay lenghts (days)

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from ICU, an average of 10 days

  13. Hospital stay lenghts

    Hospital stay lenghts (days)

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from Hospital, an average of 20 days

  14. Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia related abscess

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from ICU, an average of 10 days

  15. Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia related bacteria

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from ICU, an average of 10 days

  16. Incidence and timing of subsequent ventilator associated pneumonia during the hospital stay

    Incidence and timing of subsequent ventilator associated pneumonia during the hospital stay: relapse, recurrence, superinfection, ventilator associated pneumonia occurrence after a suspected but refuted ventilator associated pneumonia episode; recurrence is defined as improvements in manifestations (fever, secretions, vasopressor needs, inflammatory biomarkers, and chest radiograph infiltrates) after 7 days' treatment with at least ne antibiotic active on all documented bacteria, followed by the return or worsening of these manifestations with a new respiratory sample (culture, with or without PCR) positive for at least one bacterial species in significant concentrations; the same scenario with a respiratory sample positive for at least one of the initial causative bacteria defined relapse; no improvement in manifestations after 7 days' active treatment with a respiratory sample positive for at least one of the initial causative bacteria defined superinfection.

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from Hospital, an average of 20 days

  17. Incidence of noscomial infections between randomisation and hospital discharge

    Nosocomial infections including ventilator asssociated pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, bacteremia, catheter-related bloodstream infection, urinary-tract infection, soft-tissue infection, C. difficile infection, and other infections

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from Hospital, an average of 20 days

  18. Incidence of in-hospital nosocomial infections by multiresistant bacteria (MRB)

    Defined as any of the following: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-e), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB).

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from Hospital, an average of 20 days

  19. Incidences of allergies and of diarrhea

    Time frame: From day 0 until the day of discharge from Hospital, an average of 20 days

  20. Antibiotic-free days

    Time frame: day 10

  21. Number of antibotic therapy days by day 28

    computed as days of therapy (DOT), defined as the number of days on AT, with each day multiplied by the number of individual antimicrobial agents given on that day, irrespective of the number of doses given.

    Time frame: day 28

  22. Broad-spectrum days of therapy (DOT) by day 28

    (ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, or new AT for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli) (number of days on broad-spectrum AT multiplied by the number of individual antimicrobial agents given on each of those days, irrespective of the number of doses given)

    Time frame: day 28

  23. Carbapenom days of therapy (DOT) by day 28

    Carbapenem DOT by day 28 (number of calendar days during which the patient received at least one carbapenem dose multiplied by the number of individual antimicrobial agents given on each of those days, until day 28, irrespective of the number of doses given).

    Time frame: day 28

  24. Ventilator associated pneumonia antibiotic therapy

    Descriptive data : dual therapy, median time from respiratory sampling to AT, duration, de-escalation (defined as empirical AT stopped or number of empirical antimicrobials decreased or spectrum of empirical AT narrowed, based on AST results)

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  25. Descriptive antibiotic therapy data

    Ventilator associated pneumonia antibiotic therapy: antimicrobial(s), dual therapy, median time from respiratory sampling to antibiotic therapy, duration, de-escalation (defined as empirical AT stopped or number of empirical antimicrobials decreased or spectrum of empirical antibiotic therapy narrowed, based on AST results) , antibiotic therapy for reasons other than suspected VAP: antimicrobial, duration, reason

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  26. Descriptive bacteriological data

    gram stain, organisms recovered (cultured and/or identified by PCR), and antimicrobial resistance profiles

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  27. Descriptive clinical, laboratory and radiological data 48 hours before ventilator associated pneumonia suspicion

    Time frame: 48 hours before ventilator asociated pneumonia suspicion

  28. Proportion of patients with confirmed ventilator associated pneumonia

    Time frame: From day 0 to day 28

  29. Number of patients given active/inactive/unnecessary antibiotic therapy on day 0 and on the day of antibiotic therapy initiation

    Number of patients given active/inactive/unnecessary antibiotic therapy on day 0 and on the day of antibiotic therapy initiation (with active defined as at least one antimicrobial agent active against each bacterial species isolated from respiratory samples in concentrations greater than prespecified thresholds, based on AST; inactive defined as not meeting criteria for active AT; and unnecessary defined as antibiotic therapy given before sample results with these being negative)

    Time frame: Day 0 and on the day of antibiotic therapy initiation, an average of 1 day

  30. Number of patients with suitable antibotic therapy (defined as active antibiotic therapy or spared antibiotic therapy as defined below) on day 0 and on the day of antibiotic therapy initiation in the conservative strategy arm

    * Number of patients given substantiated antibotic therapy defined as started upon receipt of positive respiratory-sample culture and/or PCR test results * Number of patients given rescue antibotic therapy defined as started, in a conservative group patient, after sampling but before culture and/or PCR results, due to the development of ventilator associated pneumonia severity criteria (shock or severe ARDS) * Number of patients spared antibotic therapy for the suspected ventilator associated pneumonia episode, that is, not given antibotic therapy after sampling and having negative respiratory-sample results

    Time frame: Day 0 and on the day of antibiotic therapy initiation, until discharge from intensive care unit or up to 28 days

  31. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR)

    The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, cost per quality-adjusted life year \[QALY\] gained) of the two strategies will be computed from a collective perspective and with a 90-day time horizon then compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: day 90

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-utility analysis (CUA)

    To determine whether, in patients who have suspected non-severe VAP (no septic shock or severe ARDS), postponing AT until VAP is confirmed (by a positive respiratory-sample culture and/or PCR) is cost-efficient, compared to the immediate strategy, from a collective perspective (considering costs to the National Health Insurance (NHI) system and hospital) and with a 90-day time horizon. A cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be performed. The effectiveness of the two compared strategies will be assessed in terms of potential changes in quality of life and survival (CUA).c.

    Time frame: day 90

  2. EQ-5D-5L EuroQol score

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ5D EuroQol score

    Time frame: day 0

  3. EQ-5D-5L EuroQol score

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ5D-5L EuroQol score

    Time frame: day 28

  4. EQ-5D-5L EuroQol score

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ5D-5L EuroQol score

    Time frame: day 90

07

Study locations

42 of 42 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 37 months after the start.

Of 81 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 37 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 82 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2024
First posted
Dec 20, 2024
StartActual
Nov 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 11, 2028
CompletionEst.
Feb 11, 2029
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • CH Cholet · Cholet, FranceContact l•••@ch-cholet.fr · •••6398→j•••@ch-cholet.fr
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • CH Cholet · Cholet, FranceContact l•••@ch-cholet.fr · •••6398→j•••@ch-cholet.fr
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06743529
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2024
Start date
Nov 11, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 11, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Maëlle MARTIN
Contact
maelle.martin@chu-nantes.fr
0240 087 365 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion