ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07908693MAILEUpdated Nov 2, 2026

A Novel Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Using Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercise: Randomized Clinical Trial.

An interventional study of MAILE (Multi Angular Isometric Exercise) in Nonspecific Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain and Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), sponsored by Hamad Medical Corporation. Recruiting at 1 site in Qatar. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Hamad Medical Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2025, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercise (MAILE) in comparison to traditional lumbar stabilization and core stability treatments for managing nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). MAILE is designed to specifically target the Lumbo-Pelvic Hip complex with the goal of improving pain levels, stability, strength, and overall function.

Objectives of the study are to assess several key outcomes:

Pain Intensity: Measuring the level of pain experienced by patients. Functional Disability: Evaluating the impact of NCLBP on daily activities and overall function.

Functional Stability: Assessing the stability of the Lumbo-Pelvic Hip complex during movement.

Muscle Strength: Determining the strength of muscles within the targeted region.

By examining these outcomes, the research seeks to determine whether MAILE offers superior benefits and greater cost-efficiency compared to conventional treatments for patients with NCLBP and motor control dysfunction. If successful, MAILE could provide a more effective and economical approach to managing this common and debilitating condition. This Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) will be conducted across multiple outpatient clinics within the Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). The study will involve 98 patients diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP), who will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercises (MAILE) group or the Core Stability group. Both groups will follow tailored exercise programs over a three-week period.

The MAILE group will focus on exercises designed to enhance lumbar stability and core strength through multi-angular isometric lumbar exercises performed at various angles. These exercises aim to target the deep stabilizing muscles of the lumbar spine, promoting overall spinal stability and reducing pain. The Core Stability group will engage in exercises that emphasize the activation and strengthening of the core muscles, which play a crucial role in maintaining spinal stability and function.

The outcomes of this trial will help determine the effectiveness of MAILE compared to traditional core stability exercises in managing NCLBP, potentially guiding future therapeutic strategies.

Read the detailed description

This protocol is anchored in a motor control \& stability impairment model of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). Instead of treating LBP as a purely structural issue, it frames it as a neuromuscular coordination and load management failure within the lumbopelvic-hip complex (LPHC). MAILE isn't just strengthening - it's angle-specific neuromuscular reprogramming, which aligns with modern rehab thinking.

The protocol builds on several deeper mechanisms:

Motor Control Dysfunction - Delayed activation of transversus abdominis (TrA) and multifidus / Over-reliance on global muscles (rectus abdominis, erector spinae) / Leads to segmental instability + microtrauma cycles.

Load Transfer Failure - LPHC acts as a force transmission unit / Weakness or poor coordination and abnormal load distribution / Results in: Facet joint stress / Disc degeneration / Ligament strain.

Recurrence Mechanism - Not a one-time injury → relapsing-remitting cycle / Driven by: - Poor movement variability / Reduced adaptability under load.

This is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with solid internal validity features:

Randomization Strategy - Stratified randomization (Reduces confounding / Ensures balanced groups).

Allocation Concealment - Sealed envelope method (Prevents selection bias). Blinding Structure - Single-blinded. Realistic physiotherapy trials, Maintains outcome objectivity.

Power Calculation - Effect size = 0.6 / Power = 80% / Alpha = 0.05 / Adjusted for 10% dropout → 98 participants.

Inclusion / exclusion criteria are not generic - Inclusion is based on: Movement coordination impairment (ICF framework) Clinical instability signs: Positive prone instability test / Aberrant movement patterns / Hyper-mobility.

Exclusion : Structural pathology (fracture, tumor, radiculopathy) Red flags (cauda equina, severe osteoporosis) Confounders (surgery, systemic disease) Both groups are active - MAILE Group (Multi-angle isometric contractions) Targets: Deep stabilizers (multifidus, TrA) / Global stabilizers (QL, obliques) Focus: Static control under varying joint angles / Reduced shear forces Control Group (Traditional) - Core stability / Lumbar stabilization Outcome measure of the study - to assess Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) / Functional Disability - Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) / Muscle Activation - Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) / Functional Stability (Multi-level testing): Single-leg balance → static control / Single-leg squat → dynamic control / Three-plane testing → multiplanar stability.

Measurement time, Baseline → establishes reference / Midpoint (after 3 sessions) / Post (after 6 sessions) to see treatment effect. Risk Framework: Physical Risks (Muscle soreness / Fatigue / Minor strain) Non-Physical Risks (Psychological stress, Data privacy) / Special Considerations - (Pregnancy exclusion / Unpredictable risks acknowledged).

Statistical Strategy - Descriptive: (Mean, SD, median, IQR) Comparative: (Independent T-tests / Mann-Whitney U / Chi-square for categorical data, Hypothesis Testing: Two-tailed / p \< 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nonspecific Low Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Low Back Pain
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,884 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 483 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 98 is above the median of 60 across 2,324 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hamad Medical Corporation is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants eligible for this study must meet the following criteria:

Age between 18-60 years Diagnosed with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (NCLBP) by an orthopedic doctor, general physician, neurologist, or primary healthcare doctor Low back pain lasting for more than 3 months (pain between T12 and the gluteal fold) Must have had more pain-free days than painful days during the past year Pain located mainly in the lower lumbar region (L4/L5 and/or L5/S1) Presence of positive prone instability test Presence of aberrant movement during motion testing Straight Leg Raise > 91° BMI between 20-30

Presence of one or more of the following:

Pain worsens with sustained end-range movements or positions Lumbar hypermobility on segmental motion assessment Mobility deficits of the thorax and lumbopelvic/hip regions Reduced trunk or pelvic muscle strength and endurance Movement coordination impairments during work, recreational, or daily functional activities

Patients must also:

Be willing and able to safely participate in an exercise program Have no cognitive impairment limiting participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they have any of the following:

Radiculopathy (confirmed through clinical and neurological assessment) Cauda equina symptoms (e.g., bowel/bladder dysfunction, perianal numbness) Spinal deformities (fracture, infection, tumor) Severe osteoporosis History of lumbar spine surgery Pregnancy Psychiatric illness or cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) Substance abuse

Use of medications:

Current anticoagulants or corticosteroids Long-term steroid use (≥7.5 mg for >6 months) Recent or significant trauma Pain or neurological symptoms during positioning or lever application (unsafe for intervention) Cardiac conditions Cancer

Other significant medical conditions, including:

Rheumatologic disorders Spinal infections Prior back surgery

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercise (MAILE)

    Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercise (MAILE) will produce superior outcomes compared to traditional Core Stability and Lumbar Stabilization exercises in terms of: Pain reduction, Improved functional ability, Better core stability, Increased lumbar muscle strength and greater overall treatment effectiveness

    Other: MAILE (Multi Angular Isometric Exercise)

  • No intervention
    Core Stability and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises (CSE)

    Control group participants will receive a graded exercise program consisting of lumbar stabilization and core stability exercises aimed at improving spinal stability, muscle strength, functional ability, and pain reduction in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Interventions

  • OtherMAILE (Multi Angular Isometric Exercise)

    A single-blinded, parallel-group, stratified randomized controlled clinical trial comparing Multi Angular Isometric Lumbar Exercise (MAILE) with Core Stability and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain Intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline assessment before intervention, midpoint assessment after 2 treatment sessions, and final assessment after completion of 6 sessions over a total intervention period of 3 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to evaluate how low back pain affects daily activities and overall function.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment before intervention, midpoint assessment after 2 treatment sessions, and final assessment after completion of 6 sessions over a total intervention period of 3 weeks.

  2. Functional Stability (Core Stability)

    Assessed using: Single Leg Balance Test Single Leg Squat Test Three-Plane Core Test These tests evaluate lumbo-pelvic-hip stability and movement control.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment before intervention, midpoint assessment after 2 treatment sessions, and final assessment after completion of 6 sessions over a total intervention period of 3 weeks.

  3. Lumbar Muscle Strength / Transversus Abdominis Activation

    Measured using the Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) to assess deep core muscle activation and control.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment before intervention, midpoint assessment after 2 treatment sessions, and final assessment after completion of 6 sessions over a total intervention period of 3 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Outpatient Physiotherapy HMGH, Hamad Medical Corporation
    Doha, 3050, Qatar
    Recruiting
    • Yadulla Sayed, MPT · ContactYsayed@hamad.qa · +97455503640
    • Dr Ayman A Elmenyar, Principal Research Scientist, MD · ContactAELMENYAR@hamad.qa · +97455347641
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Reiman MP, Weisbach PC, Glynn PE. The hips influence on low back pain: a distal link to a proximal problem. J Sport Rehabil. 2009 Feb;18(1):24-32. doi: 10.1123/jsr.18.1.24. PubMed 19321904 ↗
  • Ellison JB, Rose SJ, Sahrmann SA. Patterns of hip rotation range of motion: a comparison between healthy subjects and patients with low back pain. Phys Ther. 1990 Sep;70(9):537-41. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.9.537. PubMed 2144050 ↗
  • Ben-Galim P, Ben-Galim T, Rand N, Haim A, Hipp J, Dekel S, Floman Y. Hip-spine syndrome: the effect of total hip replacement surgery on low back pain in severe osteoarthritis of the hip. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2099-102. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a3c5. PubMed 17762811 ↗
  • Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman A, Hadler N. Recurrence and care seeking after acute back pain: results of a long-term follow-up study. North Carolina Back Pain Project. Med Care. 1999 Feb;37(2):157-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00006. PubMed 10024120 ↗
  • Bergquist-Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute low back pain in industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;(170):1-117. doi: 10.3109/ort.1977.48.suppl-170.01. No abstract available. PubMed 146394 ↗
  • Von Korff M, Saunders K. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2833-7; discussion 2838-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00004. PubMed 9112707 ↗
  • Bener A, Dafeeah EE, Alnaqbi K, Falah O, Aljuhaisi T, Sadeeq A, Khan S, Schlogl J. An epidemiologic analysis of low back pain in primary care: a hot humid country and global comparison. J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Jul 1;4(3):220-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131913479385. Epub 2013 Feb 19. PubMed 23799711 ↗
  • Elnaggar RK, Elshazly FA, Elsayed WS, Ahmed AS. "Determinants and relative risks of low back pain among the employees in Al-Kharj area, Saudi Arabia." European Journal of Scientific Research. 2015;135(3):299-308
  • Casser HR, Seddigh S, Rauschmann M. Acute Lumbar Back Pain. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Apr 1;113(13):223-34. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0223. PubMed 27120496 ↗
  • Walker BF. The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Jun;13(3):205-17. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003. PubMed 10872758 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. PubMed 28919117 ↗
  • Rhyu HS, Park HK, Park JS, Park HS. The effects of isometric exercise types on pain and muscle activity in patients with low back pain. J Exerc Rehabil. 2015 Aug 30;11(4):211-4. doi: 10.12965/jer.150224. eCollection 2015 Aug. PubMed 26331136 ↗
  • Kim B, Yim J. Core Stability and Hip Exercises Improve Physical Function and Activity in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jul;251(3):193-206. doi: 10.1620/tjem.251.193. PubMed 32669487 ↗
  • Kent PM, Keating JL. The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005 Jul 26;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-13. PubMed 16045795 ↗
  • Vrbanic TS. [Low back pain--from definition to diagnosis]. Reumatizam. 2011;58(2):105-7. Croatian. PubMed 22232956 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared to protect participant confidentiality, privacy, and ethical compliance. Since the study involves sensitive personal and clinical information related to patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain, sharing raw individual-level data may increase the risk of participant identification, even after de-identification. Additionally, the informed consent provided by participants is limited to the use of data within the approved research team and for the specific purposes of this study. In accordance with institutional review board (IRB) regulations, Hamad Medical Corporation research policies, and ethical research standards, only authorized investigators will have access to the data. Therefore, only summarized and anonymized study results will be reported in publications, while individual participant data will remain confidential and securely protected.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 60 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,256 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 26, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
Jun 22, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 22, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 22, 2027
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07908693
Responsible party
Mr. Yadulla Syed (Physiotherapy Specialist, Hamad Medical Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Jun 22, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 22, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Yadulla Syed, MPT
Contact
Ysayed@hamad.qa
+97455503640
Dr Ayman A Elmenyar, Principal Research Scientist, MD
Contact
AELMENYAR@hamad.qa
+97455347541 ext. +97444394029
Yadulla Syed, MPT Ortho
principal investigator · Hamad Medical Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion