An observational study in Testicular Sperm Extraction in Azoospermic Patients, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to male participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
Determination of percentage of successful sperm retrieval in single testis in cases who will do bilateral TESE and identification factors mostly associated with successful sperm retrieval
Male infertility is defined as the failure of pregnancy within 12 months despite the presence of a fertile female partner and coitus via a normal vaginal route without contraception. The microscopic absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate in at least two semen analysis samples is defined as azoospermia. Azoospermia plays a role in the etiology of male infertility with a rate of 10-15% . Azoospermia is divided into two subgroups: obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non obstructive azoospermia (NOA). NOA is detected in 60% of patients with azoospermia. The etiopathogenesis of NOA includes genetic disorders, Y chromosome microdeletions, testicular torsion, cryptorchidism, toxins, radiation and idiopathic factors. Although many techniques including Percutaneous Sperm Aspiration , Testicular Sperm Aspiration , Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction , Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (MD-TESE) have been used to detect sperm in patients with NOA, MD-TESE is currently accepted as the method with the highest sperm retrieval rate with the least complications and tissue loss. However, no standard approach is available for searching for appropriate tubules during the MD-TESE procedure . A limited number of studies are available in the literature on whether the testicle should be explored transversely or longitudinally, bilaterally or unilaterally, to increase the sperm detection rate in MD-TESE, and there is still no standard systematic procedure for MD-TESE today to minimize the possibility of missing appropriate tubules and obtaining sperm. Furthermore, despite the presence of studies in the literature indicating that parameters such as hormonal values, testicular volume, genetics, age, environmental factors, varicocele and cryptorchidism predict the possibility of finding sperm before the MD-TESE procedure, none of these parameters have a definite predictive value on sperm finding . The present study aims to evaluate if there is difference in testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non obstructive azoospermia in TESE between right and left testes.
59 studies on the registry are indexed under Azoospermia; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 95 across 24 observational studies indexed under Azoospermia.
Browse Azoospermia studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Male patients diagnosed as non obstructive azoospermia and will do bilateral TESE.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Male patients diagnosed as non obstructive azoospermia.
Exclusion Criteria:
Obstructive azoospermia.
Bilateral Testicular sperm extraction done under microscopic guidance for non obstructive azoospermic patients
percentage of successful sperm retrieval in single testis in cases who will do bilateral TESE.
Time frame: 1 day Postoperative
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.