ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07244029ReparilUpdated Oct 30, 2026

Aescin-Based Herbal Extract (Reparil) for Postoperative Sequelae After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

An interventional study of Escin and Ibuprofen 400 mg in Postoperative Pain, Facial Swelling and Trismus, sponsored by Oman Medical Speciality Board. Recruiting at 1 site in Oman. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Oman Medical Speciality Board · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Oct 30, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aescin-based herbal extract (Reparil®) compared with Ibuprofen in managing postoperative sequelae following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. A total of 100 participants aged 18-40 years will be enrolled at the Dental Center, Medical City Hospital for Military and Security Services (MCMSS), Al Khoud, Oman. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Reparil® (Aescin 20 mg, three times daily for five days) or Ibuprofen (400 mg, three times daily for five days) following standardized third molar extraction procedures. Postoperative outcomes including pain (VAS), facial swelling (3D facial scanner), and mouth opening (digital caliper) will be assessed preoperatively, on day 2, and day 7 post-surgery. The study aims to determine whether Aescin offers comparable analgesic and anti-edematous effects to Ibuprofen with fewer adverse events.

Read the detailed description

The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most common oral surgical procedures and is frequently associated with pain, facial swelling, and trismus. These postoperative sequelae result from an acute inflammatory response triggered by surgical trauma. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), particularly Ibuprofen, are widely prescribed for symptom control but are often associated with gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular adverse effects. Hence, safer alternatives with comparable efficacy are being investigated.

Aescin, a natural saponin derived from Aesculus hippocastanum (horse chestnut), exhibits anti-inflammatory, anti-edematous, and venotonic properties. It acts by stabilizing capillary membranes, reducing vascular permeability, and inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators such as histamine and prostaglandins. Reparil tablets containing Aescin have been clinically validated for treating soft tissue edema and chronic venous insufficiency but have not been extensively evaluated in oral surgical applications.

This prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind controlled trial will compare the postoperative efficacy of Aescin (Reparil) versus Ibuprofen in patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) into two treatment groups using computer-generated allocation with pharmacist-controlled concealment. Both the operator and the outcome assessor will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Pain intensity will be measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Facial swelling will be objectively assessed using a 3D facial scanner (Revopoint POP 3), and trismus will be measured as the maximum interincisal distance. Assessments will be performed at baseline, postoperative day 2, and day 7. A rescue analgesic (diclofenac sodium 50 mg) will be provided for uncontrolled pain.

All data will be recorded via EpiData version 4.6, with statistical analysis conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0. The primary endpoint is postoperative pain reduction; secondary endpoints include facial edema, trismus improvement, and adverse drug effects. This study will contribute to evidence on the use of herbal-based anti-inflammatory agents as potential alternatives to conventional NSAIDs in oral surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Facial Swelling
  • Trismus

Keywords

  • Aescin
  • Escin
  • Reparil
  • Ibuprofen
  • Herbal anti-inflammatory
  • Postoperative sequelae
  • Third molar extraction
  • Oral surgery
  • Phytotherapeutic agents
  • Pain management
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Oman Medical Speciality Board is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients indicated for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

Age between 18 and 40 years.

Impacted mandibular third molars with similar anatomical position and difficulty level as classified by Pell and Gregory and Pederson scoring.

Healthy individuals () with no significant systemic illness.

Willing to provide written and attend all follow-up visits (Day 2 and Day 7 post-surgery).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent use (within three weeks preoperatively) of anti-inflammatories, , or antibiotics.

Known allergies or to Aescin, Ibuprofen, rescue medications, or local anesthetics.

Pregnant or lactating women.

Patients with to NSAIDs (e.g., asthma, bleeding disorders, chronic kidney disease, active peptic ulcer, or cardiovascular disease).

Recent use of substances that may affect surgery or interact with study drugs (e.g., , alcohol, or tobacco).

Surgical time exceeding 30 minutes or cases with intraoperative complications requiring non-study medications.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Aescin (Reparil®) Group

    Participants will receive Reparil®-Dragees tablets containing Aescin 20 mg, manufactured by Meda Pharmaceuticals (Germany), administered orally three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. A rescue analgesic (Diclofenac potassium 50 mg, Rapidus® by Tabuk Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Co., Saudi Arabia) will be provided if pain is uncontrolled. Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline (preoperatively), on postoperative day 2, and on day 7 for pain (VAS), facial swelling (3D scan), and mouth opening (digital caliper).

    Drug: Escin

  • Active comparator
    Ibuprofen Group

    Participants will receive Ibuprofen tablets 400 mg, manufactured by Flamingo Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (India), administered orally three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline, postoperative day 2, and day 7 to assess pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), facial swelling (3D facial scan), and mouth opening (digital caliper).

    Drug: Ibuprofen 400 mg

Interventions

  • DrugEscin

    Oral administration of Aescin 20 mg (Reparil®-Dragees, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Germany), taken three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Each tablet contains 20 mg of purified Aescin derived from Aesculus hippocastanum.

    Also known as: Reparil®-Dragees

  • Oral administration of Ibuprofen 400 mg tablets (Flamingo Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India), taken three times daily (TID) for five consecutive days following surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar.

    Also known as: Ibuprofen 400 mg Tablets BP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    Change in pain intensity measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Facial swelling (edema)

    Change in postoperative facial volume measured using a 3D facial scanner (Revopoint POP 3). Measurements will be taken at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 to assess the degree of facial edema following impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgery

  2. Mouth opening (trismus)

    Change in maximum interincisal distance (in millimeters) measured using a digital caliper at baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 2, and postoperative day 7 following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, and Day 7 post-surgery

  3. Adverse effects

    Any drug-related or postoperative adverse effects observed or reported by participants within the 7-day postoperative period will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Medical City for Military and Security Services - Dental Center
    Muscat, Al Khoud 111, Oman
    Recruiting
    • Suhail H AlSamari, BDS, MFD · Contactsuhail.dental@gmail.com · +968 97366511
    • Vidya Shetty, BDS, MDS · Contactshettyvidya007@gmail.com · +968 93681986
    • Suhail H AlSamari, BDS, MFD · Principal investigator
    • Vidya Shetty, BDS, MDS · Sub investigator
    • Abdullah Al Balushi, BDS, MFD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bjornsson GA, Haanaes HR, Skoglund LA. Ketoprofen 75 mg qid versus acetaminophen 1000 mg qid for 3 days on swelling, pain, and other postoperative events after third-molar surgery. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;43(3):305-14. doi: 10.1177/0091270002250603. PubMed 12638400 ↗
  • Al-Khateeb TH, Nusair Y. Effect of the proteolytic enzyme serrapeptase on swelling, pain and trismus after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;37(3):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 Feb 12. PubMed 18272344 ↗
  • Lokken P, Olsen I, Bruaset I, Norman-Pedersen K. Bilateral surgical removal of impacted lower third molar teeth as a model for drug evaluation: a test with ibuprofen. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Apr 4;8(3-4):209-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00567117. PubMed 786680 ↗
  • Yamashita Y, Sano N, Shimohira D, Danjo A, Goto M. A parallel-group comparison study of celecoxib with loxoprofen sodium in third mandibular molar extraction patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;43(12):1509-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 28. PubMed 25270186 ↗
  • Olmedo MV, Galvez R, Vallecillo M. Double-blind parallel comparison of multiple doses of ketorolac, ketoprofen and placebo administered orally to patients with postoperative dental pain. Pain. 2001 Feb 1;90(1-2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00396-1. PubMed 11166979 ↗
  • Wang D, He X, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhu Y, Sun C, Ye J, Jiang H, Cheng J. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1888-y. Epub 2016 Jun 18. PubMed 27316639 ↗
  • Ong CK, Lirk P, Tan JM, Sow BW. The analgesic efficacy of intravenous versus oral tramadol for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;63(8):1162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.04.028. PubMed 16094585 ↗
  • Majid OW, Al-Mashhadani BA. Perioperative bromelain reduces pain and swelling and improves quality of life measures after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;72(6):1043-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24589242 ↗
  • Gaspani L, Limiroli E, Ferrario P, Bianchi M. In vivo and in vitro effects of bromelain on PGE(2) and SP concentrations in the inflammatory exudate in rats. Pharmacology. 2002 May;65(2):83-6. doi: 10.1159/000056191. PubMed 11937778 ↗
  • Bataineh AB, Batarseh RA. The effect of modified surgical flap design for removal of lower third molars on lingual nerve injury. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2091-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1999-5. Epub 2016 Nov 12. PubMed 27837346 ↗
  • Graziani F, D'Aiuto F, Gennai S, Petrini M, Nisi M, Cirigliano N, Landini L, Bruno RM, Taddei S, Ghiadoni L. Systemic Inflammation after Third Molar Removal: A Case-Control Study. J Dent Res. 2017 Dec;96(13):1505-1512. doi: 10.1177/0022034517722775. Epub 2017 Jul 31. PubMed 28759304 ↗
  • Mehra P, Reebye U, Nadershah M, Cottrell D. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;42(7):835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 25. PubMed 23535007 ↗
  • Gallelli L. Escin: a review of its anti-edematous, anti-inflammatory, and venotonic properties. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Sep 27;13:3425-3437. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S207720. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31631970 ↗
  • Piecuch JF. What strategies are helpful in the operative management of third molars? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;70(9 Suppl 1):S25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.04.027. PubMed 22916697 ↗
  • Singhai A, Kambala R, Bhola N. Comparison of the efficacy of aescin and diclofenac sodium in the management of postoperative sequelae and their effect on salivary Prostaglandin E2 and serum C-reactive protein levels after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. F1000Res. 2024 Oct 30;13:106. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145643.3. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39507581 ↗
  • Isola G, Matarese M, Ramaglia L, Iorio-Siciliano V, Cordasco G, Matarese G. Efficacy of a drug composed of herbal extracts on postoperative discomfort after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2443-2453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2690-9. Epub 2018 Oct 11. PubMed 30311061 ↗
  • Sirtori CR. Aescin: pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic profile. Pharmacol Res. 2001 Sep;44(3):183-93. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0847. PubMed 11529685 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is a single-center academic clinical trial conducted within a limited institutional setting. Only aggregated and de-identified summary results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 9 months after the start.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 30, 2026: primary completion Jul 2026 → Oct 2026 and completion Sep 2026 → Nov 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 20, 2026was Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2026was Sep 2026
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026→Oct 20, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
Study completion
Sep 30, 2026→Nov 30, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    Primary completion Jul 30, 2026→Oct 20, 2026
    Study completion Sep 30, 2026→Nov 30, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07244029
Lead sponsor
Oman Medical Speciality Board
Responsible party
Suhail AlSamari (Principal Investigator - General Dentistry Resident (OMSB), Oman Medical Speciality Board) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Suhail H AlSamari, BDS, MFD
Contact
suhail.dental@gmail.com
+968 97366511
Vidya Shetty, BDS, MDS
Contact
shettyvidya007@gmail.com
+968 93681986
Suhail H AL Samari, BDS, MFD
principal investigator · Oman Medical Speciality Board

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Escin

Start the discussion