ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07116304Updated Aug 11, 2025

Comparative Efficacy of IV Parecoxib vs Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol Injection Pain

An interventional study of Lidocaine, a local anaesthetic. and Parecoxib 40mg in Preventing Propofol Pain on Injection, sponsored by Oman Medical Speciality Board. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by Oman Medical Speciality Board · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Propofol is the most popular IV anaesthetic agent used for induction, however one of its known side effects is causing pain on injection, the gold standard method in preventing this pain is using lidocaine prior to injecting propofol. multiple drugs have been investigated to reduce the aforementioned pain, however there has been no study comparing lidocaine to parecoxib, an NSAID.

Read the detailed description

Propofol is the most popular drug used for induction of anaesthesia. without prophylaxis, 60 to 70% of patients are affected by pain upon injection, with varying degrees of severity. The specific mechanism triggering pain is undetermined, but it is thought to be due to triggering of kallikrein-kinin cascade when it is injected.

Many strategies have been investigated to reduce the severity of this pain, with the most effective being the use of a large vein to deliver the drug, combined with pretreatment using lidocaine with venous occlusion to allow it to anaesthetize the vein locally. This approach has been shown in a large meta-analysis to be the gold standard for reducing pain caused by propofol injection, achieving up to an 80% reduction in incidence. However, this method is not widely used clinically, probably due to the extra time required to anaesthetize the vein and applying a tourniquet. On the other hand, using lidocaine as a pre- treatment or mixed with propofol has been shown to reduce pain on injection.

Multiple other agents have been investigated with the aim of preventing the pain caused by propofol injection, such as opioids and ketamine. Non-steroidal Anti inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) have also been studied, with the rationale that reducing prostaglandin production caused by the suggested cascade above. These medications are usually used as part of the multimodal analgesia delivered to the patient to prevent intraoperative and postoperative pain, if given prior to propofol, they may have the added benefit of reducing the pain caused by injecting propofol.

Parecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor in the NSAIDs class, has been investigated recently in trails to prevent pain on injection caused by propofol, where a prospective Randomised controlled trial showed that a dose of 40 mg was effective in reducing the frequency and the severity of the pain, where the incidence of pain was only 26%, compared to 58% in the placebo group. Furthermore non of the patients in this group reported moderate or severe pain. In the same study, a 20 mg Dose was only shown to reduce the severity of pain and not the incidence.

The Investigators propose this study to compare the two interventions as no previous study has investigated them in the same setting.

Objective of the study.

To compare the efficacy of intravenous parecoxib versus lidocaine in reducing pain during propofol injection in adult ASA I-II patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preventing Propofol Pain on Injection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • randomised controlled trial
  • parecoxib
  • propofol
  • NSAIDs
  • pain on injection
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Oman Medical Speciality Board is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, ≥18 years
  • ASA grading I-II
  • Patients undergoing elective surgical procedures across all surgical specialties.
  • Can speak Arabic or English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Difficulty in communicating.
  • Liver Cirrhosis patients
  • Renal failure or (CrCl) ≤ 10umol/L,
  • Known Lidocaine, parecoxib and/or propofol allergy.
  • patients who are not using propofol for an induction.
  • Any known to propofol, parecoxib or lidocaine. (this will include renal failure or cirrhosis of the liver as noted above)
  • Patients refusing to be involved in the study.
  • ASA(American society of anaesthesia) grading 3-6.
  • Any patient that IV access cannot be established in the dorsum of the hand.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with chronic pain disorders.
  • Patients who received any form of analgesia within the last hour.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Parecoxib

    Patients in this group will receive IV parecoxib 40 mg (the standard full dose for an adult) diluted to a total volume of 5 mL with normal saline. The study drug will be injected into the IV cannula on the dorsum of hand \*\*with a tourniquet applied\*\* on the mid-arm (upper forearm) to occlude venous return. The tourniquet (elastic band) pressure will be just enough to distend veins (similar to when drawing blood) but not cause excessive discomfort. The parecoxib solution will be given over \~5-10 seconds. The tourniquet will remain in place for \*\*2 minutes\*\* after injection, then released. This technique of venous occlusion is borrowed from Bier block and previous studies, aiming to localize the drug in the vein for a short period to maximize local effect. then propofol will be administered.

    Drug: Parecoxib 40mg

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine

    Patients in this group will receive IV lidocaine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg (ideal body weight) up to a maximum of 50 mg, diluted to a total of 5 mL. The lidocaine will be given into the hand IV cannula \*\*with a tourniquet\*\* on the forearm, It will likewise dwell for 2 minutes under occlusion before tourniquet release. This tourniquet method for lidocaine is known to significantly improve its efficacy in preventing injection pain

    Drug: Lidocaine, a local anaesthetic.

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine, a local anaesthetic.

    it will be given as a pretreatment prior to injection of propofol, with a tourniquet applied.

  • atients in this group will receive IV parecoxib 40 mg (the standard full dose for an adult) diluted to a total volume of 5 mL with normal saline.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of pain on injecting propofol after receiving the treatment assigned.

    Time frame: immediately after injection of 50 mg of propofol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of pain.

    Measured Via Visual analogue scale for pain. The patient will be given 50 mg of propofol and asked if there is any pain, and the severity of the pain. The severity of pain will be graded on the scale between 1 and 10, 10 being the most severe in the scale, and 1 is the minimal pain experienced.

    Time frame: immediately after injection of propofol.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Walker BJ, Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Humsi JA, Bittner RC, McDonald SB. Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da. PubMed 21455088 ↗
  • Tan CH, Onsiong MK. Pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998 May;53(5):468-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00405.x. PubMed 9659020 ↗
  • Ghai B, Makkar JK, Bala I, Wig J. Effect of parecoxib pretreatment and venous occlusion on propofol injection pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2010 Mar;22(2):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.011. PubMed 20304348 ↗
  • Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110. PubMed 21406529 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2025; primary completion for Dec 2026, 16 months later.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 16 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2025
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
StartEst.
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Aug 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07116304
Lead sponsor
Oman Medical Speciality Board
Responsible party
Mohammed Hamood Alrashdi (Resident Doctor, Oman Medical Speciality Board) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Study contacts

Mohammed Alrashdi, Mb BCH BAO
Contact
r24005@resident.omsb.org
+96896686858

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Parecoxib

Start the discussion