ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07231614Updated Nov 17, 2025

Anesthetic Effectiveness of Lidocaine Versus Articaine in Dentistry

A Phase 4 interventional study of lidocaine + epinephrine 1:100,000 and Articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 in Dental Pain, sponsored by Universidad Austral de Chile. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-17.

Sponsored by Universidad Austral de Chile · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Context: Lidocaine and articaine are two of the most commonly used local anesthetics in dentistry. Lidocaine has often been the anesthetic of choice in clinical practice, but in clinical experience, articaine has proven to be more effective in controlling pain during dental procedures. (Camps-Font, O. et al. 2020).

There are still unanswered questions, such as which of the two local anesthetics is more effective in reducing pain? This could lead us to discuss which one to choose to reduce costs in the dental office.

Objective: The objective of this project is to determine and compare the effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in clinical contexts such as tooth extraction with infiltrative techniques, seeking to provide answers that will optimize the choice of anesthetic based on the patient and the procedure, thus improving pain management and reducing costs in the dental office.

Design: Randomized double-blind experimental study, parallel groups. The control group received 2% lidocaine, and the experimental group received 4% articaine. The study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT 2010). The probabilistic sampling technique is through simple randomization. The 100 patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the control and experimental groups in a 1:1 ratio.

Expected results: articaine shows a lower percentage of extractions with anesthetic reinforcement and, therefore, a lower average number of additional tubes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • nerve block
  • comparative study
  • exodontics
  • pain measurement
  • anesthesia infiltration
03

In context

Toothache

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Toothache; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 84 across 123 interventional studies indexed under Toothache.

Browse Toothache studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Austral de Chile is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with clinical indications for simple extraction of upper and lower teeth using infiltrative anesthetic techniques.
  • Patients without systemic diseases ()
  • Patients with controlled systemic disease (ASA II)
  • Patients with no history of to anesthetics or their components (epinephrine)
  • Patients with stable periodontal condition, without active infection that could affect the diffusion of the anesthetic.
  • Patients with the ability to understand the procedure and provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases and pregnant patients.
  • Patients requiring trunk techniques (Gow gates, Spix, Carrea)
  • Patients taking medication that affects the anesthetic response (tricyclic antidepressants, anticoagulants)
  • Patients with a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders that may influence the perception of pain or anxiety.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities in the orofacial region that interfere with the administration or action of anesthesia.
  • Patients with a history of recent substance abuse.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine

    Participant in this group will receive lidocaine as a local anesthetic during dental procedures.

    Drug: lidocaine + epinephrine 1:100,000

  • Experimental
    Articaine

    Participant in this group will receive articaine as a local anesthetic during dental procedures.

    Drug: Articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000

Interventions

  • Druglidocaine + epinephrine 1:100,000

    Administration of lidocaine as a local anesthetic during dental extraction.

  • DrugArticaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000

    Drug page: Carticaine

    Administration of articaine as a local anesthetic during dental extraction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of tubes

    continuous quantitative variable

    Time frame: immediately after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain during dislocation using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain with a minimum of 0 meaning no pain, and a maximum of 10 meaning the most severe pain ever experienced in life.

    Continuous quantitative variable

    Time frame: After the procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Age

    Continuous quantitative variable.

    Time frame: immediately after the procedure

  2. Sex

    Nominal qualitative variable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CESFAM Dr. Jorge Sabat
    Valdivia, Los Ríos Region 5090000, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Halabi D, Escobar J, Alvarado C, Martinez N, Munoz C. Chlorhexidine for prevention of alveolar osteitis: a randomised clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170245. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0245. Epub 2018 May 7. PubMed 29742264 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial, including demographic information, medical history relevant to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, type of anesthetic administered, and study outcome measures, will be available for secondary analyses.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 0 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 27, 2025
First posted
Nov 17, 2025
StartEst.
Dec 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 25, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jan 25, 2026
Last update
Nov 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07231614
Lead sponsor
Universidad Austral de Chile
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2025
Start date
Dec 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 25, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2025

Study contacts

Natalia A Curín, Student
Contact
natalia.curin@alumnos.uach.cl
+56947029930
Camila A Henriquez, Student
Contact
camilantonia.12345@gmail.com
+56954911248
Juan E Kunstmann, Dr. Dental Surgeon Dentistry
study director · Universidad Austral de Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Carticaine

Start the discussion