ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07220213Updated Jan 22, 2026

FELLAShip to Better Health

An interventional study of FELLAship in High Blood Glucose, High Cholesterol and High Cholesterol/Hyperlipidemia, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-22.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 316 studies in Hyperglycemia with a site in United States — 30 open to participants now, 38 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Hyperglycemia · United States.

Planned enrollment
90th of 265
90 · median 48
Started
2026
with 8 others
No phase
143 of 316
17 open now
Primary completion
2027-01
later than 17 of 37 live
Registered
309th of 316
by date

Among the 316 studies in Hyperglycemia with a site in United States, this one is the 90th largest by planned enrollment of the 265 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 9 that started in 2026, is one of 143 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 17 of the 37 other live ones, and was the 309th registered.

Hyperglycemia

800 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperglycemia; 115 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 50 across 620 interventional studies indexed under Hyperglycemia.

Browse Hyperglycemia studies →

Open to participants now

30 of the 316 studies in Hyperglycemia with a site in United States are open now.

All 30 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 72 Hyperglycemia studies recruiting now, 43 (60%) set no upper age limit and 23 (32%) stop at 75 or younger; 11 take children under 18; 15 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · male · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 316 studies in Hyperglycemia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the FELLAship program-a church-based cardiovascular health (CVH) intervention-in Black men aged 35-70 who are at risk for heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and related conditions. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does participation in the FELLAship program improve cardiovascular health metrics (e.g., blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar) and health behaviors among Black men at The Worship Center Christian Church (TWC)?
  • What factors influence the adoption, delivery, and sustainability of the FELLAship program in a faith-based setting? Researchers will compare an immediate-start intervention group and a delayed-start (waitlist control) group to assess both short-term health outcomes and program implementation factors.

Participants will:

  • Attend a 90-minute weekly session for 24 weeks, including 45 minutes of physical activity led by a certified trainer and 45 minutes of health education delivered by trained coaches.
  • Receive one-on-one support from a community health worker to reduce barriers to care and engage with primary care.
  • Complete biometric health screenings and surveys at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks to assess clinical and behavioral outcomes.
  • Use a smartwatch, blood pressure cuff, and other tools to track progress in real time.
  • Participate in exit focus groups or interviews to share feedback about the intervention.
  • A subset of TWC leaders and interventionists (N=15) will also be interviewed to assess implementation, resource needs, and sustainability.

This study uses the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to assess Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, and aims to inform scalable strategies for improving CVH among Black men in trusted community settings.

03

Conditions studied

  • High Blood Glucose
  • High Cholesterol
  • High Cholesterol/Hyperlipidemia
  • Blood Sugar; High
  • Obesity & Overweight
  • Diabetes Type 2
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identified Black men
  • Age 18 or older
  • LE8 (Life's Essential 8) score (threshold not specified, but implies "less than ideal" CVH)
  • English speaking
  • Resides in the Metropolitan Birmingham, Alabama area
  • No physical activity restrictions imposed by a healthcare provider

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not identifying as Black and male
  • Under age 18
  • Non-English speakers
  • Not living in the Birmingham, Alabama metro area
  • Having a healthcare provider-imposed restriction on physical activity
  • Ideal CVH (i.e., LE8 (Life's Essential 8) score above inclusion threshold)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FELLAship

    FELLAship intervention participants will receive the 24-week intervention according to the curriculum, to be delivered by a health coach, personal trainer, and community health worker.

    Behavioral: FELLAship

  • No intervention
    Waitlist Control

    Individuals in the waitlist control arm will not receive the intervention during the evaluation period. They will have access to the intervention post-evaluation period.

Interventions

  • BehavioralFELLAship

    TheFELLAship intervention, grounded in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and guided by the Socioecological Model (SEM), focuses on enhancing participants' skills, knowledge and beliefs, and self-efficacy to promote cardiovascular health (CVH). The program provides health education aligned with the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and American Heart Association's Check. Change. Control. (AHA CCC) curriculum to support behavior change in diet, physical activity, tobacco use, sleep, and clinical care engagement. Team-based coaching and physical activity sessions strengthen behavioral confidence and skill application.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Overall Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 overall cardiovascular health score (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), assessed at 12 and 24 weeks.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Blood Pressure Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 blood pressure subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), derived from systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured using an automated sphygmomanometer.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Body Mass Index Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 body mass index subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), calculated using measured height (inches) and weight (pounds) to derive BMI.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  3. Change in Life's Essential 8 Diet (subjective)

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 diet subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), measured using the 16-item Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans questionnaire.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  4. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Blood Lipids Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 blood lipids subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), derived from non-HDL cholesterol measured from a blood sample.

    Time frame: 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Blood Glucose Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 blood glucose subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), derived from hemoglobin A1c measured from a blood sample.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  6. Change From Baseline in Perceived Stress Score

    Change from baseline in perceived stress, measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  7. Change in Life's Essential 8 Physical Activity (Self Reported)

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 physical activity subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), derived from self-reported minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  8. Change in Life's Essential 8 Physical Activity (Accelerometry)

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 physical activity subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), derived from 7 days of accelerometry data collected using an ActiGraph device.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Nicotine Exposure Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 nicotine exposure subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), based on self-reported use of cigarettes or inhaled nicotine delivery systems.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  10. Change From Baseline in Life's Essential 8 Sleep Health Score

    Change from baseline in the Life's Essential 8 sleep health subscore (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better cardiovascular health), measured using self-reported average hours of sleep per night.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  11. Change From Baseline in Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Score

    Change from baseline in patient activation, measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) score.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Social Needs Score

    Change from baseline in health-related social needs, measured using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  13. RE-AIM Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Indicators

    Adoption, implementation, and maintenance indicators of the FELLAship intervention, assessed using structured interviews, meeting documentation, and organizational records in alignment with the RE-AIM framework.

    Time frame: 156 Weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Worship Center Cristian Church
    Birmingham, Alabama 35210, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study involves a relatively small, community-based sample recruited from a single faith-based organization. Even with de-identification, there is a heightened risk that individuals could be re-identified based on demographic characteristics or other contextual details. To protect participant privacy and honor community trust, we will limit data access to the study team and approved partners under strict data security protocols.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 208 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hyperglycemia, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 225 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2025
First posted
Oct 23, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Last update
Jan 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07220213
Collaborators
The Worship Center Christian Church
Responsible party
Nashira Brown (Associate Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2026

Study contacts

LeAndrea D Anderson
Contact
leandreaanderson@uabmc.edu
2059960089

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion