An interventional study of HRP Sampling period and NPL Sampling period in Cigarette Smoking, Tobacco Use and Cigarette Smoking Behavior, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.
Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study aims to investigate harm-reduction sampling in a choice format versus medicinal nicotine sampling on smoking behavior, identify mechanisms of sampling's effects, and explore moderators of these effects among a national sample of people unmotivated to quit smoking. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to choose one of two harm-reduction products (ECIG, ONP) versus a medicinal nicotine control condition (nicotine patch + lozenge, NPL), receive a 4-week starter product regimen, and then be followed for 6 months to assess use behavior.
Catalyzing smoking behavior change among people unready or unmotivated to quit smoking (PUQS) has the potential to disrupt decades of smoking and toxicant exposure, drastically reducing smoking-attributable morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, current smoking cessation treatment approaches are typically designed for people who are seeking treatment and ready to quit smoking, which is the minority of people who smoke. Harm reduction product sampling, an extension of medication sampling, is a pragmatic and scalable approach to proactively engage people in transitioning away from combustible cigarette smoking. Sampling does not rely on sufficient motivation to initiate smoking behavior change. Rather, targeting behaviors consistent with quitting smoking (e.g., use of a starter regimen) can fuel motivation and smoking behavior change. In the only harm reduction sampling study to date, we found that a 4-week supply of e-cigarettes produced significant changes in smoking behavior compared to a no-provision control condition. E-cigarette uptake was robust compared to studies of medication sampling where no use or underuse of smoking cessation medication hindered sustained abstinence. These findings, coupled with our recent research, highlighted that any single harm-reduction product is only reinforcing to a fraction of users, but reinforcing value is one of the most important predictors of transitioning away from combustible cigarettes. As such, offering a choice among products is critical to provide appealing options for people with differing preferences and fully test the public health benefits of harm-reduction sampling among PUQS. Two potential alternatives to combusted cigarettes - e-cigarettes (ECIGS) and oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) - each have the potential to reach more people who smoke than smoking cessation medication, resulting in a greater population reduction in harm from combustible tobacco. We propose the first investigation of harm-reduction sampling versus medicinal nicotine sampling on PUQS smoking behavior, mechanisms of sampling's effects, and potential moderators of these effects. A national sample of PUQS (n= 472, defined as not being ready to quit in the next 30 days) will be recruited and randomized 2:1 to choose one of two harm-reduction products (ECIG, ONPs) versus a medicinal nicotine control condition (nicotine patch + lozenge, NPL). Product choice among those randomized to harm reduction will be informed by trying each product after biochemically confirmed overnight smoking abstinence, allowing each participant to try individual products before selecting their preferred option. Upon product selection (or assignment to NPL), participants will receive a 4-week starter product regimen. The primary outcome measure is a biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at the 6-month follow- up, with a 3-month follow-up as a secondary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include a 24-hour quit attempt and a 50% cigarette reduction per day. The findings have the potential to fill a critical clinical gap, advance evidence- based harm reduction approaches, and reduce smoking-attributable morbidity and mortality.
Exclusion Criteria:
Smoking Behavior
Alcohol and Drug
Medical
Psychiatric
1. Lifetime history of schizophrenia or psychosis.
General Exclusion
Participants randomized to HRP will try and rate ECIGS and ONPS during 2 virtual visits, and receive a 4-week supply of their preferred HRP (ECIGS or ONPs) for the sampling period.
Other: HRP Sampling period
Participants randomized to NPL will try a nicotine patch and nicotine lozenge during 1 virtual lab visit and will receive a 4-week supply of nicotine patches and lozenges for the sampling period.
Other: NPL Sampling period
During a 28-day sampling period, participants randomized to HRP are instructed to try their selected HRP (ECIGS or ONPs) and will complete daily e-diaries of cigarette smoking behavior and product uptake.
During a 28-day sampling period, participants randomized to NPL are instructed to try nicotine patches and nicotine lozenges and will complete daily e-diaries of cigarette smoking behavior and product uptake.
Smoking abstinence
Seven-day point prevalence smoking abstinence (CO \< 5) will be measured at the 3-month (secondary endpoint) and 6-month follow-up (primary endpoint) via the valid and reliable TLFB procedure and biochemically verified through a CO \< 5 ppm.
Time frame: 29 weeks
Smoking reduction
Cigarette smoking rate and whether participants achieved a 50% change in cigarettes per day compared to their baseline smoking rate will be measured at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up via the valid and reliable TLFB procedure.
Time frame: 29 weeks
24-hour quit attempts
24-hour quit attempts and the number (count) of serious attempts to quit smoking, including those lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours, will be captured through diaries during the sampling period and the TLFB during follow-up.
Time frame: 29 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine