ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07177001Updated Feb 24, 2026

Neck and Low Back Pain in Physical Therapy Students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica

An interventional study of Clinical Control Group (Group A) and Spine Exercise Program (Group B) in Back Pain, Low Back Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, sponsored by The University of The West Indies. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Jamaica. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Primary conditionLow Back PainRegistry: Back PainReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Back Pain — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Low Back Pain
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Low Back Pain, a narrower term within Back Pain.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by The University of The West Indies · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students enrolled at The University of the West Indies, Mona. It also aims to assess students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health and to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme in reducing musculoskeletal pain and improving functional status among those reporting symptoms. The study will be conducted in two phases, beginning with a descriptive cross-sectional assessment of prevalence, followed by a prospective randomised controlled trial in which students experiencing neck and/or low back pain will be allocated to either a spine-specific exercise intervention group or a non-spine-specific exercise control group for comparative analysis of outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Neck and low back pain are among the most common musculoskeletal conditions worldwide, affecting individuals across a wide range of professions. Although often self-limiting, these conditions may become recurrent or chronic, leading to functional limitations, reduced productivity, and diminished quality of life. Occupational and training-related factors such as prolonged sitting, sustained computer use, awkward postures, repetitive spinal movements, and poor ergonomics are well-recognised contributors to spinal pain. It is estimated that approximately 37% of low back pain is occupation-related, with neck pain strongly associated with forward head posture, sustained flexion, and repetitive movements.

Physical therapy (PT) students represent a unique population at increased risk for musculoskeletal pain, with vulnerability beginning during their training years. The physical and academic demands of physiotherapy education expose students to multiple risk factors in both preclinical and clinical phases of training. During the preclinical phase, students spend prolonged hours attending lectures, studying, and completing assignments, frequently involving sustained sitting and extensive use of electronic devices. During clinical training, students are exposed to physically demanding tasks including prolonged standing, manual therapy techniques, therapeutic exercise demonstration, patient transfers, and assisted mobility activities. These repetitive and load-bearing activities may place significant stress on the cervical and lumbar spine.

International literature demonstrates a high prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students. Systematic reviews report low back pain prevalence rates ranging from 60-80% during training. Comparative studies suggest that physical therapy students may experience higher rates of low back pain than medical students, likely due to the physically demanding nature of manual therapy training and patient handling. Neck pain is also highly prevalent, with studies reporting rates between approximately 50-70%, often attributed to prolonged studying, suboptimal posture, electronic device use, and psychosocial stress. Identified risk factors are multifactorial and include poor ergonomics, repetitive manual techniques, prolonged standing, sedentary behaviours during study periods, elevated academic stress, and variable personal exercise habits.

Despite this growing body of international evidence, there is currently no published research examining the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students in Jamaica or the wider Caribbean. At The University of the West Indies (UWI), Mona, approximately 120 physical therapy students are enrolled across three years of training, with an estimated 40 students per cohort. Understanding the burden of musculoskeletal pain within this population is essential, particularly given their future professional role in musculoskeletal rehabilitation and injury prevention.

Exercise therapy is widely recognised as one of the most effective non-pharmacological interventions for both acute and chronic spinal pain. Evidence supports structured exercise programmes in improving muscular strength, flexibility, endurance, spinal stability, and functional outcomes, while reducing pain intensity. Targeted spine-specific and core-strengthening exercises enhance neuromuscular control and promote optimal spinal alignment, thereby reducing mechanical strain and risk of recurrent injury.

This study aims to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among physical therapy students at The University of the West Indies, Mona, and to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health. It also seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme in reducing pain and improving functional status among students reporting musculoskeletal discomfort.

The study will be conducted in two phases using descriptive and experimental frameworks. In the first (descriptive) phase, a cross-sectional design will be used to assess the prevalence of neck and low back pain among all enrolled PT students. Participants will complete questionnaires assessing musculoskeletal discomfort, as well as knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to spine health.

In the second (experimental) phase, students who report neck and/or low back pain will be prospectively randomised into either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will participate in an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme, while the control group will receive a non-spine-specific exercise programme administered in parallel to minimise placebo effects. Outcome measures will include the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), and structured questionnaires assessing functional status and spine-health knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained. Each participant will be assigned a unique study identification number, and only demographic, occupational, clinical, and outcome data relevant to the study will be recorded. All data will be securely managed using REDCap, a password-protected web-based platform compliant with national data protection standards. Statistical analysis will be conducted using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), and all study records will be securely stored and destroyed three years after study completion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Spine Health
  • Physical Therapy
  • Physiotherapist Students
  • Physiotherapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lower back pain
  • low back pain
  • neck pain
  • musculoskeletal pain
  • spine health
  • physical therapy students
  • physiotherapy students
  • rehabilitation
03

In context

Low Back Pain Reclassified

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of The West Indies is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Compared within Low Back Pain, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Back Pain. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All students enrolled in the Physical Therapy program at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Jamaica during the period November 1, 2025 to October 31, 2026.
  2. Individuals who express a willingness to consent to the study.
  3. Individuals who express a willingness to adhere to the standardised exercise program for the stipulated period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals with a history of having spine surgery.
  2. Individuals who were previously diagnosed with spine pathology and currently receiving rehabilitation therapy.
  3. Individuals who express an unwillingness to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clinical Control (Group A)

    All participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group A will be given a non-spine specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period after which time, participants will be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as a Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.

    Behavioral: Clinical Control Group (Group A)

  • Experimental
    Spine Exercise Program (Group B)

    All participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group B will be given a standardised spine-specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period, after which time they will be be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain, having received the intervention.

    Behavioral: Spine Exercise Program (Group B)

Interventions

  • BehavioralClinical Control Group (Group A)

    The participants who reported the presence of neck or low back pain and were assigned to the clinical control group (Group A) after randomisation will receive a non-spine specific exercise program provided in a handout. The interventional group (Group B) will be asked to keep the standardised spine-specific exercise program confidential and not share with the control group (Group A). After eight (8) weeks, Group A participants will receive: the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess for changes in the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; a Questionnaire B, to ascertain any changes in their pain level using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); as well as their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.

  • BehavioralSpine Exercise Program (Group B)

    The standardised spine-specific exercise program will be provided in a handout and given only to the intervention group (Group B), and will include specific spine basic neck or low back exercises to be done three (3) times per week, as well as brief stretching exercises, to be done during periods of sitting for greater than sixty (60) minutes. The selected participants will be asked to comply with instructions on the handout. Participants who experience worsening of their symptoms, or who develop new symptoms will be assessed as having an adverse outcome and will be withdrawn from the study and referred for evaluation and treatment if necessary.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ)

    The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire measures the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain, as reported by participants. The individually reported frequency score is then multiplied by the discomfort score and by the interference score to determine overall severity of pain experienced. This tallied score is then classified by severity into: no discomfort (0), mild (1 to 4.5), moderate (5 to 14), severe (15 - 45) and very severe (45 or higher). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their reported scores.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at eight (8) weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low back Pain (Questionnaire A)

    Questionnaire A is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at baseline (time of enrolment), and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Time frame: Done at the time of enrollment (Baseline)

  2. Change from Baseline in Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low Back Pain (Questionnaire B)

    Questionnaire B is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at the end of treatment at 8 weeks, and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Time frame: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  3. Change from Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale is a reliable and valid, unidimensional 11-point scale used for patient self-reporting of perceived pain. Its scale uses integers which range from zero (0) to ten (10), where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. This is then categorised into mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their perceived pain. This scale is from public domains and as such, permission for its use is not required.

    Time frame: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex, University of The West Indies-Mona Campus
    Kingston, Jamaica
    • Paula U.A Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR · Contactpaula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm · 876-631-4000 or 876-927-1297
    • Shantelle B Peddlar, MBBS · Contactpmrphysiatryclinic@gmail.com · 1-876-927-1297
    • Paula U.A Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR · Principal investigator
    • Anthony E Miller, BSc PT, DPT · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ogunlana MO, Govender P, Oyewole OO. Prevalence and patterns of musculoskeletal pain among undergraduate students of occupational therapy and physiotherapy in a South African university. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2021 Jun;41(1):35-43. doi: 10.1142/S1013702521500037. Epub 2021 Jan 18. PubMed 34054255 ↗
  • Naing L, Nordin RB, Abdul Rahman H, Naing YT. Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01694-7. PubMed 35907796 ↗
  • Erdinc O, Hot K, Ozkaya M. Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work. 2011;39(3):251-60. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1173. PubMed 21709361 ↗
  • Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):7-19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.504. PubMed 10744172 ↗
  • Standaert CJ, Herring SA. Expert opinion and controversies in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: core stabilization as a treatment for low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12):1734-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.002. PubMed 18047895 ↗
  • Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022. PubMed 27417610 ↗
  • O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2959-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020. PubMed 9431633 ↗
  • Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007. PubMed 17909210 ↗
  • Garcia L, Thompson J, Reed B. Low back pain in nursing students: Prevalence and risk factors. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;35(3):150-156.
  • Williams N, Garcia M, Robinson P. Musculoskeletal pain in healthcare students: A comparative analysis. J Allied Health Sci. 2021;37(4):210-222.
  • Khan F, Tariq H, Malik Z. The impact of poor posture on neck pain among undergraduate physiotherapy students. Pak J Rehabil. 2021;10(1):78-85.
  • Ali S, Hassan R, Ahmed M. Prevalence of neck among physiotherapy students in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Health Sci. 2020;9(2):45-51.
  • Brown P, Clark M, Adams T. Neck pain prevalence and associated risk factors among physiotherapy students. J Musculoskeletal Pain 2022;29(3):183-194.
  • Doe J, Smith L, Wilson H. Comparison of musculoskeletal disorders in physiotherapy and medical students. J Med Educ Res. 2019;40(2):115-124.
  • Johnson D, Miller K, Lee R. Low back pain among physiotherapy students: A cross sectional study. Physiother Res Int. 2021;28(1):e1872.
  • Smith A, Jones B, Patel C. The prevalence and impact of low back pain in physiotherapy students: A systematic review. J Rhys There Sci 2020;32(4):567-574.
  • Smith DR, Leggat PA, Walsh LJ. Workplace hazards among Australian dental students. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):186-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01116_8.x. No abstract available. PubMed 19473172 ↗
  • Lorusso A, Vimercati L, L'abbate N. Musculoskeletal complaints among Italian X-ray technology students: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMC Res Notes. 2010 Apr 24;3:114. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-114. PubMed 20416101 ↗
  • Smith DR, Leggat PA. Musculoskeletal disorders among rural Australian nursing students. Aust J Rural Health. 2004 Dec;12(6):241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1854.2004.00620.x. PubMed 15615575 ↗
  • Alshagga MA, Nimer AR, Yan LP, Ibrahim IA, Al-Ghamdi SS, Radman Al-Dubai SA. Prevalence and factors associated with neck, shoulder and low back pains among medical students in a Malaysian Medical College. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul 1;6:244. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-244. PubMed 23815853 ↗
  • Falavigna A, Teles AR, Mazzocchin T, de Braga GL, Kleber FD, Barreto F, Santin JT, Barazzetti D, Lazzaretti L, Steiner B, Beckenkamp NL. Increased prevalence of low back pain among physiotherapy students compared to medical students. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):500-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1646-9. Epub 2010 Dec 7. PubMed 21136121 ↗
  • Smith DR, Wei N, Ishitake T, Wang RS. Musculoskeletal disorders among Chinese medical students. Kurume Med J. 2005;52(4):139-46. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.52.139. PubMed 16639985 ↗
  • Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. Association between sitting and occupational LBP. Eur Spine J. 2007 Feb;16(2):283-98. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0143-7. Epub 2006 May 31. PubMed 16736200 ↗
  • Punnett L, Pruss-Utun A, Nelson DI, Fingerhut MA, Leigh J, Tak S, Phillips S. Estimating the global burden of low back pain attributable to combined occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Dec;48(6):459-69. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20232. PubMed 16299708 ↗
  • Ehrlich GE. Low back pain. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):671-6. Epub 2003 Nov 14. PubMed 14710509 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07177001
Lead sponsor
The University of The West Indies
Responsible party
Paula Dawson, MBBS (Head, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Principal Investigator, The University of The West Indies) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Paula UA Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR
Contact
paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm
1-876-927-1297 ext. Ext. 8049
Shantelle B Peddlar, MBBS
Contact
pmrphysiatryclinic@gmail.com
1-876-927-1297 ext. 8050
Paula U.A Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR
principal investigator · Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion