CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07194746Updated Feb 24, 2026

The Prevalence of Neck and Low Back Pain in FMSTRC Staff At the UWI Mona

An interventional study of Clinical Control Group (Group A) and Spine Exercise Program (Group B) in Neck Pain, Back Pain and Musculoskeletal Pain, sponsored by The University of The West Indies. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Jamaica. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by The University of The West Indies · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among full-time staff at the Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex (FMSTRC), The University of the West Indies, Mona. It also seeks to assess staff members' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health and to evaluate the effectiveness of an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme in reducing musculoskeletal discomfort among those experiencing neck and low back pain. The study will be conducted in two phases using a descriptive cross-sectional design followed by a prospective randomised controlled trial, in which participants reporting pain will be allocated to either a spine-specific exercise intervention group or a non-spine-specific exercise control group for comparative analysis of outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Neck and low back pain are among the most common musculoskeletal conditions worldwide. Although often self-limiting, these conditions can become disabling and negatively affect productivity, occupational performance, social participation, and activities of daily living. Occupational factors such as prolonged sitting, sustained computer use, forward head posture, repetitive movements, awkward positioning, prolonged standing, and manual handling tasks are well-recognised contributors to spinal pain.

Workers within the Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex (FMSTRC) at The University of the West Indies, Mona represent a diverse occupational group that includes academic staff, administrative personnel, clinical instructors, laboratory staff, and ancillary workers. Academic and administrative staff frequently engage in prolonged desk-based work, extended computer use, and sustained sitting during lectures, research, and documentation. Clinical and laboratory personnel are exposed to prolonged standing, ward rounds, procedure assistance, and repetitive task performance. Ancillary staff may perform physically demanding duties such as lifting, cleaning, equipment handling, and working in sustained or awkward postures. These occupational exposures, compounded by suboptimal ergonomic practices and reduced core stability, may increase the risk of developing neck and low back pain.

International literature demonstrates a high prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among university employees and healthcare-related occupational groups. Identified risk factors include prolonged sedentary behaviour, repetitive strain, elevated body mass index, smoking, prior musculoskeletal injury, psychosocial stressors, and family history of spinal disorders. Despite this growing body of evidence, there is currently no published study examining the prevalence of neck and low back pain among university staff in Jamaica or the wider Caribbean, particularly within a multidisciplinary academic and clinical complex such as the FMSTRC.

Exercise therapy is widely recognised as an effective non-pharmacological intervention for both acute and chronic spinal pain. Evidence shows that structured exercise programmes improve muscular strength, flexibility, endurance, and spinal stability while reducing pain intensity and functional limitations. Exercise also promotes improved posture, enhances neuromuscular control, and supports overall spinal health, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent injury.

This study aims to determine the prevalence of neck and low back pain among full-time staff at the Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex (FMSTRC), The University of the West Indies, Mona, and to compare the effectiveness of a standardised spine-specific exercise programme versus a non-spine-specific exercise programme in reducing pain and improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to spinal health.

The study will be conducted in two phases and guided by both descriptive and experimental frameworks. In the first phase (descriptive phase), a cross-sectional design will be used to assess the prevalence of neck and low back pain among full-time FMSTRC workers across all occupational categories. Participants will complete questionnaires assessing the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort in the neck and low back, as well as their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding spine health.

In the second phase (experimental phase), staff members who report neck and/or low back pain will be randomised into either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will participate in an eight-week standardised spine-specific exercise programme. The control group will receive a non-spine-specific exercise programme administered in parallel during the study period to minimise placebo effects. Pre- and post-intervention data will be collected using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), and structured questionnaires (Questionnaires A and B) to assess changes in pain intensity, functional status, and spine-health knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained. Each participant will be assigned a unique study identification number, and only demographic, occupational, clinical, and outcome data relevant to the study will be recorded. All data will be securely managed using REDCap, a password-protected web-based platform compliant with national data protection standards. Statistical analysis will be conducted using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), and all study records will be securely stored and destroyed three years after study completion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Back Pain
  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Spine
  • Work Related Illnesses
  • Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

Keywords

  • neck pain
  • back pain
  • Musculoskeletal pain
  • low back pain
  • spinal health
  • work related musculoskeletal disorders
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. All full time academic/office/supplementary/ancillary staff employed to the Faculty of Medical Science, Training and Research Complex, UWI, Mona.
  2. Individuals with a willingness to adhere to exercise program given in a handout.
  3. Individuals age 18-65
  4. Individuals with at least 1 year experience in their current position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Individuals with a history of having spine surgery
  2. Individuals previously diagnosed with a spine pathology
  3. Individuals currently receiving physiotherapy for a spine problem
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clinical Control (Group A)

    All participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group A will be given a non-spine specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period after which time, participants will be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as a Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.

    Behavioral: Clinical Control Group (Group A)

  • Experimental
    Spine Exercise Program (Group B)

    All participants will complete the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) to assess for perceived pain; as well as Questionnaire A to assess their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of neck or low back pain. Participants who are found to have neck or low back pain will be randomised into two (2) groups: a clinical control group (Group A) and an intervention group (Group B). Group B will be given a standardised spine-specific exercise program over an eight (8) week period, after which time they will be be reassessed using the CMDQ and NRS, as well as Questionnaire B to evaluate for changes in their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain, having received the intervention.

    Behavioral: Spine Exercise Program (Group B)

Interventions

  • BehavioralClinical Control Group (Group A)

    The participants who reported the presence of neck or low back pain and were assigned to the clinical control group (Group A) after randomisation will receive a non-spine specific exercise program provided in a handout. The interventional group (Group B) will be asked to keep the standardised spine-specific exercise program confidential and not share with the control group (Group A). After eight (8) weeks, Group A participants will receive: the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ) to assess for changes in the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain; a Questionnaire B, to ascertain any changes in their pain level using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); as well as their knowledge, attitude and practice towards musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back pain.

  • BehavioralSpine Exercise Program (Group B)

    The standardised spine-specific exercise program will be provided in a handout and given only to the intervention group (Group B), and will include spine-specific basic neck or low back exercises to be done three (3) times per week, as well as brief stretching exercises, to be done during periods of sitting for greater than sixty (60) minutes. The selected participants will be asked to comply with instructions on the handout. Participants who experience worsening of their symptoms, or who develop new symptoms will be assessed as having an adverse outcome and will be withdrawn from the study and referred for evaluation and treatment if necessary.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ)

    The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire measures the frequency, discomfort and interference with work due to musculoskeletal pain, as reported by participants. The individually reported frequency score is then multiplied by the discomfort score and by the interference score to determine overall severity of pain experienced. This tallied score is then classified by severity into: no discomfort (0), mild (1 to 4.5), moderate (5 to 14), severe (15 - 45) and very severe (45 or higher). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their reported scores.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at eight (8) weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low back Pain (Questionnaire A)

    Questionnaire A is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at baseline (time of enrolment), and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Time frame: Done at the time of enrollment (Baseline)

  2. Change from Baseline in Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Musculoskeletal Problems of Neck and Low Back Pain (Questionnaire B)

    Questionnaire B is a self-administered general questionnaire used to evaluate participants' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding musculoskeletal problems of the neck and low back. Knowledge is scored on a scale of 0-5, with 0-1 indicating poor or inadequate knowledge, 2-3 indicating moderate knowledge, and 4-5 indicating good or adequate knowledge. Attitude is scored 0-4, with 0-1 representing poor attitude, 2-3 moderate attitude, and 4 good attitude. Practice is scored 0-56, based on 12 questions, with 0-12 indicating poor or inadequate practices, 13-24 below average or fair, 25-32 average or moderate, 33-43 above average or good, and 44-56 excellent practices. Higher scores indicate better knowledge, more positive attitudes, and healthier practices related to neck and low back musculoskeletal problems. The questionnaire is administered at the end of treatment at 8 weeks, and each domain will be analysed separately.

    Time frame: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  3. Change from Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale is a reliable and valid, unidimensional 11-point scale used for patient self-reporting of perceived pain. Its scale uses integers which range from zero (0) to ten (10), where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. This is then categorised into mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10). All participants will complete this assessment upon enrollment, as well as after an eight (8) week period of treatment, to evaluate any changes in their perceived pain. This scale is from public domains and as such, permission for its use is not required.

    Time frame: From Enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medical Sciences Teaching and Research Complex, University of The West Indies-Mona Campus
    Kingston, Jamaica
    • Paula U.A Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR · Contact · paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm · 876-631-4000 or 876-927-1297
    • Shantelle B Peddlar, MBBS · Contact · pmrphysiatryclinic@gmail.com · 1-876-927-1297
    • Paula U. A. Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR · Principal investigator
    • Anthony E Miller, BSc PT, DPT · Sub investigator
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians; American College of Physicians; American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006. PubMed 17909209 ↗
  • Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaee M, Kargarfard M, Sangelaji B, Tamrin SBM. Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts of office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Mar-Apr;22(2):144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6. PubMed 28939263 ↗
  • Lier R, Nilsen TI, Vasseljen O, Mork PJ. Neck/upper back and low back pain in parents and their adult offspring: Family linkage data from the Norwegian HUNT Study. Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):762-71. doi: 10.1002/ejp.599. Epub 2014 Sep 29. PubMed 25263611 ↗
  • Green BN, Johnson CD, Snodgrass J, Smith M, Dunn AS. Association Between Smoking and Back Pain in a Cross-Section of Adult Americans. Cureus. 2016 Sep 26;8(9):e806. doi: 10.7759/cureus.806. PubMed 27790393 ↗
  • Chang JH, Wu JD, Liu CY, Hsu DJ. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic assessments of cleaners. Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jul;55(7):593-604. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22064. Epub 2012 Apr 27. PubMed 22544565 ↗
  • Naing L, Nordin RB, Abdul Rahman H, Naing YT. Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01694-7. PubMed 35907796 ↗
  • Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022. PubMed 27417610 ↗
  • Herman Miller Research Corporation. (1989). How office workers spend their time and position themselves. Internal document.
  • Erdinc O HK, Ozkaya M. CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION,VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OFCORNELL MUSCULOSKELETAL DISCOMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE (CMDQ) IN TURKISH LANGUAGE. 2008.
  • Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):7-19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.504. PubMed 10744172 ↗
  • Lis AM, Black KM, Korn H, Nordin M. Association between sitting and occupational LBP. Eur Spine J. 2007 Feb;16(2):283-98. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0143-7. Epub 2006 May 31. PubMed 16736200 ↗
  • Lorusso A, Vimercati L, L'abbate N. Musculoskeletal complaints among Italian X-ray technology students: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMC Res Notes. 2010 Apr 24;3:114. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-114. PubMed 20416101 ↗
  • Smith DR, Wei N, Ishitake T, Wang RS. Musculoskeletal disorders among Chinese medical students. Kurume Med J. 2005;52(4):139-46. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.52.139. PubMed 16639985 ↗
  • Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007. PubMed 17909210 ↗
  • O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2959-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020. PubMed 9431633 ↗
  • Chiu TT, Ku WY, Lee MH, Sum WK, Wan MP, Wong CY, Yuen CK. A study on the prevalence of and risk factors for neck pain among university academic staff in Hong Kong. J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Jun;12(2):77-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1015008513575. PubMed 12014228 ↗
  • Sihawong R, Janwantanakul P, Jiamjarasrangsi W. A prospective, cluster-randomized controlled trial of exercise program to prevent low back pain in office workers. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):786-93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3212-3. Epub 2014 Feb 4. PubMed 24492949 ↗
  • Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5. PubMed 18252901 ↗
  • Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MA, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Oct;19(5):297-312. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1470. PubMed 8296178 ↗
  • Hush JM, Michaleff Z, Maher CG, Refshauge K. Individual, physical and psychological risk factors for neck pain in Australian office workers: a 1-year longitudinal study. Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1532-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1011-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28. PubMed 19399537 ↗
  • Cagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D. Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):679-86. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0269-7. Epub 2006 Dec 8. PubMed 17160393 ↗
  • Punnett L, Pruss-Utun A, Nelson DI, Fingerhut MA, Leigh J, Tak S, Phillips S. Estimating the global burden of low back pain attributable to combined occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Dec;48(6):459-69. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20232. PubMed 16299708 ↗
  • Buckle P. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2005 May;55(3):164-7. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi081. PubMed 15857895 ↗
  • Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000 Jan;84(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00187-6. PubMed 10601677 ↗
  • Samad NIA AH, Moin S, Tamrin SBM and Hashim Z. Prevalence of Low Back Pain and its Risk Factors among School Teachers. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2010;7(5):634-

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07194746
Lead sponsor
The University of The West Indies
Responsible party
Paula Dawson, MBBS (Head, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Principal Investigator, The University of The West Indies) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Paula U. A. Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR
Contact
paula.dawson@uwimona.edu.jm
1-876-927-1297 ext. Ext. 8049
Shantelle B Peddlar, MBBS
Contact
pmrphysiatryclinic@gmail.com
1-876-927-1297 ext. Ext. 8050
Paula U. A. Dawson, MBBS, Diplomate ABPMR
principal investigator · Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion