ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07528768Updated Sep 22, 2026

HEADWATERS: Gemcitabine vs Paclitaxel in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m^2) and Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly in Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer, sponsored by The University of The West Indies. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by The University of The West Indies · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
750
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gemcitabine, a chemotherapy drug that is usually used to treat breast cancer after other treatments have failed, is better at treating triple negative breast cancer in women of African ancestry than Paclitaxel, one of the chemotherapy drugs that is usually used first. People will be invited to participate in the trial if they are women of African ancestry, specifically from Jamaica, Barbados and Ghana, are 18 years or older, have had a biopsy that shows that they have triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and are willing to take part.

The main questions the trial aims to answer are:

  1. Does Gemcitabine stop triple negative breast cancer from growing or spreading better than Paclitaxel?
  2. Are participants more likely to get better when taking Gemcitabine or Paclitaxel?
  3. What medical problems do participants have when taking Gemcitabine for breast cancer?
  4. Do Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel affect Black women of African Ancestry differently than women from other regions or ethnic groups?

To answer these questions, half of participants will be treated with Gemcitabine while half is treated with Paclitaxel. Both drugs are given by injection and have already been approved for breast cancer treatment. Participants will:

  • Take Gemcitabine for two weeks followed by a two-week break or take Paclitaxel once a week for the same time period.
  • Have some of the cancer tissue that was tested from their biopsy taken for more testing.
  • Have a physical exam and a blood test done every 3 weeks.
  • Have images of their cancer taken using CT (Computed Tomography) or MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) every 6 weeks.
  • Answer a brief questionnaire about how they are feeling every 8 weeks.
  • Be checked on every month after treatment is finished to make sure the cancer hasn't come back.
Read the detailed description

This is a Phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the second-line chemotherapy drug Gemcitabine compared with standard-of-care Paclitaxel as first-line treatment for women of African ancestry with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms, stratified by study site (5 major hospitals in Jamaica, Barbados and Ghana). Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision.

Participants assigned to the investigational arm will receive Gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Participants assigned to the control arm will receive Paclitaxel administered weekly according to institutional standard practice.

Tumor assessments- via MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) or CT (Computed Tomography) as appropriate- will be conducted at regular intervals to evaluate disease status. Safety assessments (blood test panels) will occur throughout the study, and patient-reported outcomes will be collected using validated quality-of-life instruments.

Participants will be followed for progression, adverse events and survival outcomes for up to 12 months following treatment initiation. Data will be collected and managed using a secure, HIPAA-compliant electronic data capture system in compliance with HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). All analyses will be conducted using de-identified data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Triple Negative Breast Cancer
  • Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
  • Gemcitabine
  • Paclitaxel
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Overall Survival
  • Quality of Life
  • Caribbean
  • Jamaica
  • Barbados
  • Ghana
  • African-Ancestry
  • Transatlantic
03

In context

Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

1,219 studies on the registry are indexed under Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; 446 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 750 is above the median of 60 across 1,053 interventional studies indexed under Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of The West Indies is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Self-identified Black women of Jamaican, Barbadian or Ghanaian ancestry
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. confirmed triple-negative breast cancer (recent required)
  4. (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-1
  5. No prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease
  6. Adequate organ function (detailed laboratory criteria specified)
  7. Written
  8. Willingness to provide biospecimens for research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior gemcitabine, anthracycline, or taxane treatment in any setting
  2. Active requiring immediate treatment
  3. Pregnant or breastfeeding
  4. Concurrent participation in other interventional trials
  5. Medical conditions precluding safe chemotherapy administration
  6. Inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
750 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention - Gemcitabine

    Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

    Drug: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m^2)

  • Active comparator
    Control - Paclitaxel

    Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly or docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

    Drug: Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly

Interventions

  • DrugGemcitabine (1000 mg/m^2)

    Drug page: Gemcitabine

    Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

  • DrugPaclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly

    Drug page: Paclitaxel

    Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly or docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Time from randomization to first documented disease progression per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria or death, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from randomization to death from any cause

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  2. Quality of Life Score on EORTC QLQ-C30

    Quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Covers 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional and Social), 3 symptom scales (Fatigue, Pain and Nausea/Vomiting) and a global health status scale. All are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to higher functioning or better quality of life on the functional and global health scales, and higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms on the symptom scales.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  3. Quality of Life Score on EORTC QLQ-BR23

    Quality of life assessed using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire breast cancer-specific module (QLQ-BR23). This includes 4 functional scales (Body Image, Future Perspective, Sexual Functioning and Sexual Enjoyment) 4 symptom scales (Systemic Therapy Side Effects, Upset by Hair Loss, Arm Symptoms and Breast Symptoms). All scales are scored from 0 to 100, with a high score representing higher functioning/better quality of life on the functional scales and worse symptoms on the symptom scales.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

  4. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events graded by CTCAE v5.0

    Occurrence of any treatment-emergent adverse events, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0).

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Bridgetown, Saint Michael, Barbados
  • Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
    Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana
  • The University of the West Indies, Mona
    Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
    • Simone Badal, PhD · Contactsimone.badal@uwi.edu · 876-325-7366
    • Alison E Ayoub, MSc · Contactalison.ayoub@uwi.edu · 8765537242
    • Dwight Lowe, DM, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Magdalene Nwokocha, DM, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Derria Cornwall, DM, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Patrick Roberts, DM, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Rory Thompson, DM, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Althea Bailey, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data will be made available after the conclusion of the study to researchers with approved proposals via email request. Data sharing will require a signed data use agreement and be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning after publication of primary results and available for at least 5 years.

Access criteria: Access will be provided to researchers with methodologically sound proposals, subject to approval by the study investigators and execution of a data use agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07528768
Lead sponsor
The University of The West Indies
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust, Kingston Public Hospital, University of Ghana, AntiCancer Research Jamaica
Responsible party
Simone Badal (Principal Investigator, The University of The West Indies) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Simone Badal, PhD
Contact
simone.badal@uwi.edu
1-876-325-7366
Ashley M McPherson, BSc
Contact
ashley.mcpherson02@uwi.edu
876-585-8345
Magdalene Nwokocha, DM, MBBS
study director · University Hospital of the West Indies

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Gemcitabine

Start the discussion