CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07067645vaginaUpdated Jul 16, 2025

Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Length: Horizontal vs. Vertical Closure

An interventional study of Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique and Vertical Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique in Prolapse, Vaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse, sponsored by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective clinical study aims to evaluate the impact of vaginal cuff closure orientation-horizontal versus vertical-on postoperative total vaginal length in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy combined with lateral suspension. By comparing anatomical outcomes between the two closure techniques, the study seeks to determine which method better preserves vaginal length, potentially influencing surgical preferences and postoperative quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This prospective clinical study is designed to evaluate the effect of vaginal cuff closure orientation-horizontal versus vertical-on postoperative total vaginal length in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with lateral suspension. Vaginal length is a significant factor in pelvic floor support, sexual function, and patient satisfaction after pelvic organ prolapse surgeries.

Eligible patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and lateral suspension for uterine prolapse will be randomly assigned to two groups based on the vaginal cuff closure technique: Group 1 (horizontal closure) and Group 2 (vertical closure). All surgeries will be performed by the same surgical team to minimize technique-related variability. Preoperative and postoperative total vaginal lengths will be measured via standardized pelvic examination and recorded.

Secondary outcomes will include patient-reported symptoms (e.g., sensation of vaginal shortening, sexual function), surgical duration, intraoperative complications, and early postoperative outcomes. The study aims to provide evidence-based guidance on optimal vaginal cuff closure technique in uterovaginal prolapse surgery, with an emphasis on preserving vaginal length and improving postoperative quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prolapse, Vaginal
  • Vaginal Vault Prolapse

Keywords

  • Vault suspension
  • vaginal length
03

In context

Uterine Prolapse

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Prolapse; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is below the median of 70 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Prolapse.

Browse Uterine Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cases with vaginal hysterectomy and lateral suspension surgery due to stage 3-4 uterine prolapse Agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cases that have previously undergone a different suspension surgery due to descent uteri (vaginal hysterectomy and sacrospinous ligament fixation surgery, vaginal hysterectomy and sacrocolopexy surgery, vaginal hysterectomy and high sacouterin plication surgery) Cases that have undergone vaginal hysterectomy due to malignancy Cases that have undergone radiotherapy due to malignancy (brachytherapy) Patients who are not suitable for surgical intervention due to severe vaginal atrophy.

Patients who will not be able to comply with the follow-up process. Not accepting to participate in the study or not signing the informed consent form

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure

    Patients in this group will undergo vaginal hysterectomy with lateral suspension, followed by horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff using standard suturing technique. The effect on postoperative total vaginal length will be evaluated.

    Procedure: Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique

  • Active comparator
    Vertical Vaginal Cuff Closure

    Patients in this group will undergo vaginal hysterectomy with lateral suspension, followed by vertical closure of the vaginal cuff using standard suturing technique. Postoperative vaginal length outcomes will be compared to those of the horizontal closure group.

    Procedure: Vertical Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureHorizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique

    In this arm, patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with lateral suspension will receive horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff. After removal of the uterus, the vaginal cuff is closed in a transverse (right-to-left) direction using standard absorbable sutures. The technique aims to maintain or optimize the anatomical axis and preserve vaginal length in the horizontal plane. The entire procedure is performed under general or regional anesthesia by an experienced surgical team.

  • ProcedureVertical Vaginal Cuff Closure Technique

    In this arm, patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with lateral suspension will receive vertical closure of the vaginal cuff. After the uterus is removed, the vaginal cuff is closed in a cranio-caudal (top-to-bottom) orientation using absorbable sutures. This technique is hypothesized to better support apical structures and reduce tissue tension. Procedures are performed under general or regional anesthesia with standardized operative technique.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Score

    POP-Q scores will be used to assess anatomical outcomes of the pelvic support structures before and after surgery. Standardized POP-Q measurements (Aa, Ba, C, D, Ap, Bp, gh, pb, tvl) will be recorded preoperatively, 3 and 6 months postoperatively by blinded examiners. The primary focus will be on point C (vaginal apex) and total vaginal length (TVL) for comparison between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively

  2. PISQ-12 Questionnaire Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) will be administered to sexually active patients preoperatively, 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess sexual function and satisfaction. Changes in the total PISQ-12 score will be analyzed between the horizontal and vertical closure groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07067645
Lead sponsor
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Responsible party
Serkan Kumbasar (Associate Professor, Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Study contacts

serkan kumbasar, md
Contact
drserkankumbasar@gmail.com
+90 5067873216
ecenur çelikoğlu, md
Contact
ecenurcelikoglu14@gmail.com
+90 538 549 2848
yagmur acıyiyen, md
principal investigator · Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion