ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06024109BARHYSTERUpdated Jun 2, 2026

Performance of SYMMCORA® vs. V-Loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

An observational study in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Endometriosis and Uterine Prolapse, sponsored by Aesculap AG. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Aesculap AG (part of B. Braun) · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
132
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to show the superiority of the new unidirectional barbed suture (SYMMCORA® mid-term, unidirectional) to conventional suture material in terms of time to perform the vaginal cuff closure during gynecologic surgeries without an increase in the complication rate.

Secondly, the superiority of SYMMCORA®, mid-term unidirectional compared to the V-Loc®, unidirectional will be assessed regarding the mean time to close the vaginal cuff. The study will be performed in routine clinical setting, the only difference will be the randomization into two different suture groups. Both suture materials which will be applied to approximate the vaginal cuff are approved and carrying the CE-marks. Additionally, both sutures will be applied in their intended use. Neither additional invasive measures nor additional burden in regard to the patient will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
  • Endometriosis
  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Uterine Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Fallopian Tube Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

  • Barbed Suture
  • Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minimal Invasive
03

In context

Metrorrhagia

153 studies on the registry are indexed under Metrorrhagia; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 132 is below the median of 171 across 33 observational studies indexed under Metrorrhagia.

Browse Metrorrhagia studies →

Lead sponsor

Aesculap AG is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Female patients undergoing an elective, laparoscopic total hysterectomy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females undergoing an elective, laparoscopic total hysterectomy
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Open surgery
  • Patients undergone drug treatment within the prior 6 months
  • Patients with or allergy to the suture material.
  • Participation in another clinical study
  • Non-compliance of patient
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
132 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • SYMMCORA®

    Barbed suture SYMMCORA® used for the vaginal cuff closure in female patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. The product under investigation and the comparator suture material will be used in routine clinical practice and according to the Instructions for Use (IfU).

    Device: Closure of the Vaginal Cuff after Total Hysterectomy

  • V-Loc®

    Barbed suture V-Loc® used for the vaginal cuff closure in female patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. The product under investigation and the comparator suture material will be used in routine clinical practice and according to the Instructions for Use (IfU).

    Device: Closure of the Vaginal Cuff after Total Hysterectomy

Interventions

  • DeviceClosure of the Vaginal Cuff after Total Hysterectomy

    Closure of the vaginal cuff in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy. The product under investigation and the comparator suture material will be used in routine clinical practice and according to the Instructions for Use (IfU).

    Also known as: Suturing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suturing time to close the vaginal cuff

    Measured in Minutes. Time to perform the vaginal cuff closure after laparoscopic total hysterectomy using a stop watch. Time starts when the needle passes the first time the tissue and ends after completion of the wound closure (cut of the needle from the thread).

    Time frame: intraoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with early complications

    Documented early complications include Hemoglobin drop and Fever more than 38°C within 48 hours

    Time frame: at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery)

  2. Number of patients with complications over the study period

    Documented complications include Vaginal cuff infection, Vaginal cuff dehiscence (Defined as a visually confirmed partial or complete opening of the vaginal stump with or without visceral organ herniation), Vaginal cuff granulation formation, Pelvic Abscess Formation, Hematoma, Vaginal spotting (defined as bloody vaginal discharge that did not require extraordinary procedures or medication and disappeared spontaneously. (Days of postoperative bleeding, Number of pads / tampons used), Vaginal bleeding (Defined as postoperative vaginal stump bleeding that required additional stump suture to stop bleeding. (Days of postoperative bleeding, number of pads / tampons used), Urinary tract infection, Bladder injury, Ureter injury, Bowel obstruction, Ileus, Cystitis and Pelvic Adhesions.

    Time frame: at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  3. Number of patients with device deficiencies over the study period

    Documented device deficiencies include Suture rupture, Knots in the thread, Connection between needle and thread not intact and Disconnection of the anchor from the thread

    Time frame: intraoperatively, at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  4. Patient satisfaction (VAS 0-100) over time

    The patient's self assessment of her satisfaction with the surgery. This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), represented by a line 10 cm of length, which states "0" at one end representing "low" and "100" at the opposite end representing "high". The value is measured in \[mm\] with a ruler and documented in whole numbers.

    Time frame: at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  5. Progress of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) compared to baseline

    The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a 19-item, self-report measure of female sexual function that provides scores on overall levels of sexual function as well as the primary components of sexual function in women, including sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction. The 19 items of the FSFI use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater levels of sexual functioning on the respective item. (0 points in some cases for items that are not applicable). To score the measure, the sum of each domain score is first multiplied by a domain factor ratio (0.6 for desire; 0.3 for arousal and lubrication; 0.4 for orgasm, satisfaction and pain) in order to place all domain totals on a more comparable scale, and then subsequently summed to derive a total FSFI score. The domain scores range from 1.2 - 6, the overall score ranges from 7.2 - 36.

    Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline), at follow-up visits 6-8 weeks postoperatively and 6 months postoperatively

  6. Overall operation time

    From the first cut to the end of the surgery

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  7. Cost of treatment

    Calculation using the length of hospitalization (days until discharge), suturing time, suture costs and needed transfusions)

    Time frame: at discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery)

  8. Length of postoperative hospital stay

    calculated by subtracting the surgery date from the date of discharge

    Time frame: at discharge (approximately 10 days after surgery)

  9. Progress of Patient's abdominal pain (VAS 0-100) compared to baseline

    The patient's self assessment of her abdominal pain. This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), represented by a line 10 cm of length, which states "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "heavy pain". The value is measured in \[mm\] with a ruler and documented in whole numbers

    Time frame: preoperatively (baseline) and at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  10. Progress of Patient's pelvic pain (VAS 0-100) compared to baseline

    The patient's self assessment of her pelvic pain. This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), represented by a line 10 cm of length, which states "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "heavy pain". The value is measured in \[mm\] with a ruler and documented in whole numbers

    Time frame: preoperatively (baseline) and at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  11. Progress of Patient's lumbar pain (VAS 0-100) compared to baseline

    The patient's self assessment of her lumbar pain. This parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), represented by a line 10 cm of length, which states "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "heavy pain". The value is measured in \[mm\] with a ruler and documented in whole numbers

    Time frame: preoperatively (baseline) and at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  12. Progress of General Health Status compared to baseline

    The patient's self assessment of her general health status. Health status is based on assessment of the patient to the question, "Would you say your health in general is...:" The options are excellent / very good / good / fair / poor

    Time frame: preoperatively (baseline) and at discharge (up to 10 days after surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively

  13. Patient assessment of postoperative Dyspareunia

    Dyspareunia is defined by genital pain that can be experienced before, during, or after intercourse. The patient answers with yes or no.

    Time frame: at both follow-up visits (6-8 weeks postoperatively and 6 months postoperatively)

  14. Assessment of the handling of the barbed suture (SYMMCORA®)

    Assessment of the handling of the unidirectional barbed suture (SYMMCORA®) intra-operatively including eleven different dimensions (pliability, Pass-through, traumaticity, anchoring capacity, safety of closure, locking system size, locking system deployment, locking system unbarbed area, locking system safety of closure, atraumaticity, wound closure approximation) and an overall impression with 5 evaluations levels (excellent, very good, good, satisfied, poor).

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  15. Assessment of the handling of the barbed suture (SYMMCORA®) compared to conventional suture

    Assessment of the handling of the barbed suture (SYMMCORA®) compared to conventional suture regarding degree of difficulties and the ease of handling. (Likert Scale: strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree).

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  16. Assessment of the handling of the barbed suture (SYMMCORA®) compared to barbed suture (V-Loc)

    Assessment of the barbed suture (SYMMCORA®) compared to barbed suture (V-Loc®) regarding smoothness, suppleness, traumaticity of the thread, the handling, the opening of the package and the overall opinion (Likert Scale: worse, equal, better).

    Time frame: intraoperatively

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Klinikum Sachsenhausen der DGD
    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 60594, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Amadeus Hornemann, Prof. Dr. · Contact
    • Amadeus Hornemann, Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu de Manresa
    Manresa, Barcelona 08243, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Lourdes Hinojosa Sánchez, Dra. · Contact
    • Lourdes Hinojosa Sánchez, Dra. · Principal investigator
    • Arantxa Monteils Llabenia, Dra. · Sub investigator
    • Núria Grané Garcia, Dra · Sub investigator
    • Carmen Bergos Sorolla, Dra. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baumann P, Sanchez LH, Garcia NG, Sologiuc L, Hornemann A. Assessment of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture versus a competitor barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure after gynaecology surgery, study protocol of a randomized controlled trial - BARHYSTER. BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02700-z. PubMed 39806425 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 34 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2023
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
StartActual
Mar 19, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Jun 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06024109
Lead sponsor
Aesculap AG
Collaborators
B.Braun Surgical SA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Start date
Mar 19, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Petra Baumann
Contact
petra.baumann@aesculap.de
+49746195 ext. 1646
Amadeus Hornemann, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Klinikum Sachsenhausen der DGD

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion