ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07566949Fin-UPUpdated May 11, 2026

The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial)

An interventional study of Manchester procedure and Vaginal hysterectomy in Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), sponsored by Tampere University Hospital. Recruiting at 6 sites in Finland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by Tampere University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
426
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse.

The main question it aims to answer is:

  • What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up

Participants will:

  • be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such
  • visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation
  • fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation
Read the detailed description

Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting quality of life. Uterine prolapse, a type of apical prolapse, lacks a universally accepted surgical treatment, though vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension (VH) has been the standard for years. Uterus-preserving procedures, such as the Manchester procedure (MP), are gaining popularity due to their less invasive nature and women's preference to retain the uterus. Limited evidence suggests MP may have a shorter recovery time and lower short-term recurrence rates compared to VH, but long-term benefits remain unclear. As most current data comes from observational studies, a randomized controlled trial is needed to reliably compare the effectiveness and patient outcomes of MP and VH.

Methods and analysis The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (Fin-UP) is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) superiority trial with two arms: (1) the MP and (2) VH. Patients with symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2, and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1 are eligible. The primary outcome is the composite outcome of success defined as the absence of POP beyond the hymen; the absence of bulge symptoms; and the absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes, pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction, perioperative parameters, and adverse events. Follow-up will take place at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. 426 participants will be recruited, providing 80% power (α=0.05) to detect an 11% difference between groups in the primary outcome, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the trial has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa (ETL-code R25060). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and result in PhD theses. The data will provide important long-term clinical information that will help to unify the very commonly performed prolapse surgery in Finland.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)

Keywords

  • Uterine prolapse
  • Pelvic organ prolapse
  • Manchester procedure
  • Vaginal hysterectomy
  • Vaginal surgery
03

In context

Uterine Prolapse

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Prolapse; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 426 is above the median of 70 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Prolapse.

Browse Uterine Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
  • Women aged over 18 years
  • No previous POP surgery
  • Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
  • Active of any kind
  • for uterine preservation, i.e. suspected cervical or uterine malignancy, abnormal cervical cytology, abnormal uterine bleeding, a history of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, or a known hereditary cancer syndrome involving the uterus (e.g., Lynch syndrome). All patients will undergo a clinical examination and ultrasound assessment prior to recruitment. If clinically indicated, a Pap-smear and/or endometrial will be performed prior to inclusion.
  • Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
  • Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
  • Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
  • Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
426 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The Manchester procedure

    Procedure: Manchester procedure

  • Active comparator
    Vaginal Hysterectomy

    Procedure: Vaginal hysterectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureManchester procedure

    The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. The posterior peritoneum is opened if considered technically feasible and clinically appropriate. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The ligament complex is sutured to the proximal part of the anterior cervix. The cervix is amputated using diathermy, and the patency of the cervical canal is ensured. The vaginal epithelium is sutured circumferentially around the remaining cervical stump. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when deemed indicated by the surgeon.

    Also known as: Fothergill's operation, Manchester-Fothergill procedure

  • ProcedureVaginal hysterectomy

    The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. Both the anterior and posterior peritoneum are opened. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The uterus is removed in multiple steps by clamps and sutures. The adnexa are checked for abnormalities. Apical suspension is performed using a 0-polyglactin (braided, delayed-absorbable) suture. The suture incorporates the ligament complex on both sides and passes twice through the peritoneum and the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall, exiting into the posterior fornix and returning through the same tissue layers. The suture is tightened to obliterate the cul-de-sac. In case of a large enterocele, an additional transverse suture may be placed proximally. The ligament pedicles are tied together in the midline. The vaginal wall is closed. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when indicated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success at two year follow-up

    Success is defined as a composite outcome including 1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and 2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and 3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication). Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.

    Time frame: Two year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    7 step Likert scale (Much better - somewhat better - a little better - no change - a little worse - somewhat worse - much worse)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  2. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)

    Defined by the question "When taking into account all your symptoms related to prolapse, do you consider your current state good enough?" (yes/no)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  3. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)

    Questionnaire, 0 to 300, higher is worse

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  4. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

    Questionnaire, 0 to 48, higher indicates better sexual function

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  5. Generic health related quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D-5L

    Questionnaire, 0 to 1, higher is better

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  6. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)

    Anatomical outcomes assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Measurements include points Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C, and D where applicable as well as genital hiatus (GH), perineal body (PB), and total vaginal length (TVL). All measurements are recorded in centimeters relative to the hymen (for POP-Q points) or as linear measurements (GH, PB, TVL). For POP-Q points, negative values indicate positions above the hymen and positive values indicate descent beyond the hymen, with higher values representing worse prolapse.

    Time frame: 2 and 5 year follow-up

  7. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse

    Proportion

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years

  8. Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence

    Proportion.

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  9. Further treatment for associated conditions

    Proportion

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  10. Adverse events

    Including blood loss \>500 ml, bladder or ureter injury, bowel injury, hematoma, need for blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, prolonged need for catheterisation, infection, postoperative hemorrhage, need for reoperation due to complication, death, complication with anestesia or other complication. The Clavien-Dindo classification of each complication will be reported.

    Time frame: From operation to two months

  11. Operating time

    Minutes

    Time frame: Perioperative

  12. Blood loss

    ml

    Time frame: Perioperative

  13. Insertion of IUD

    Yes/no (MP-group)

    Time frame: Perioperative

  14. Weight of uterus

    VH-group, g

    Time frame: Perioperative

  15. Initiation of antithrombotic profylaxis

    Yes/no

    Time frame: Perioperative

  16. Duration of hospitalization

    Days spent in hospital, including the day of operation

    Time frame: Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up

  17. Duration of sick leave

    Days, obtained from KELA registry

    Time frame: From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up

  18. Long term complications

    Such as menstrual problems or hematometra, stenosis of the cervical canal, difficulties with uterine access during cervical or endometrial sampling or intrauterine device insertion, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal cervical findings, malignancy of the uterine body or cervix (MP-group), or other

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

  19. Success at five year follow-up

    Success is defined as a composite outcome including 1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and 2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and 3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication). Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.

    Time frame: Five year follow-up

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Dec 2033, 91 months later.

Of 37 interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Prolapse, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 91 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 8, 2026
First posted
May 5, 2026
StartEst.
May 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2033
CompletionEst.
Dec 2041
Last update
May 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07566949
Collaborators
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Turku University Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Hospital Nova, Central Finland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 5, 2026
Start date
May 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2041 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Päivi K Karjalainen, MD, PhD
Contact
paivi.karjalainen@hyvaks.fi
+358142695512
Anniina Karioja, MD
Contact
anniina.karioja@pirha.fi
+358331165005

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion