ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07049419EC-MHUpdated May 5, 2026Results posted

The Impact of Environmental Controls on Mental Health

An observational study in Neurologic Disorders, sponsored by NHS Lothian. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by NHS Lothian · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Within the UK there are over 15 million people who live with at least one long term condition. Of these people, over 4 million suffer from mental health problems.

Environmental control systems are a type of assistive technology that can be controlled by a wide variety of different access methods (e.g. switches) and can assist people with physical disabilities usually with a neurological condition to control various electronic devices in the home environment. The systems are designed to provide independence, removing the requirement to be reliant on other people (for the operation of the controlled devices) and potentially could have a positive effect on mental health and quality of life.

The research question for this study is to determine impact of environmental controls on mental health. It is hypothesised that there will be a positive impact on mental health of the participants. The question above will be answered by collecting questionnaire data pre and post intervention. Participants will be identified by Clinical Scientists working in NHS Lothian's Environmental Control Service (ECS). Participants will be recruited from NHS Lothian and so will be living in the Lothian area. The patient will be contacted following the normal protocol for arranging an environmental control assessment, at which point they will be approached to join the study. Participants will answer questions in their home environment both in person and over the phone.

The end point of the study will be 14 months from the start date (allowing for follow up data to be collected for anyone recruited towards the end of the 12-month recruitment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurologic Disorders

Keywords

  • Environmental controls
  • Activities of daily living
  • Mental health
  • Self-help devices
  • Psychological well-being
03

In context

Nervous System Diseases

757 studies on the registry are indexed under Nervous System Diseases; 218 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 150 across 228 observational studies indexed under Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

NHS Lothian is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

NHS Lothian patients who have been referred to the Environmental Control Service and are eligible for environmental controls.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible for environmental control system (as per NHS Scotland criteria).
  • New user (no previous intervention).
  • Neurological condition.
  • Cognitive ability to answer the questions and to give consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous environmental control intervention.
  • Patients requiring equipment not supplied by NHS Lothian's ECS (e.g. door interface).
  • Patient recently diagnosed (within 6 months).
  • Rapidly deteriorating condition.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Environmental control system users

    Patients who are eligible for environmental control system users as part of standard clinical care.

    Device: Provision of an environmental control system

Interventions

  • DeviceProvision of an environmental control system

    Part of standard clinical care for patients referred to the NHS Lothian environmental control service.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in PROMIS Global10 Score.

    Percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PROMIS-10 Mental Health score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID for this measure was defined as an improvement of ≥6 points on the PROMIS-10 Mental Health T-score. All scoring was performed according to standard PROMIS guidelines. All participants included in the analysis met the MCID threshold for this outcome. Therefore, the number of participants achieving MCID is equal to the number analysed. These values represent actual measured data and are not placeholders.

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in the PIADS.

    The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) is a self-report questionnaire measuring the perceived impact of assistive technology on psychological well-being, functional independence, and quality of life. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PIADS total score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID was defined as an improvement of ≥0.5 points on the PIADS scale. Scoring was conducted according to standard PIADS procedures.

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalisability. All outcome analyses are reported in the corresponding results tables.

Participant flow

Participants were identified by clinicians working in NHS Lothian's Environmental Control Service. This consisted of screening any new referrals coming into the service and seeing whether they met the inclusion criteria. Recruitment start date: 29/01/2024 and end date: 29/10/2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnvironmental Control System Users
Started5
Completed5
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving MCID in PROMIS Global10 Score.

Percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PROMIS-10 Mental Health score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID for this measure was defined as an improvement of ≥6 points on the PROMIS-10 Mental Health T-score. All scoring was performed according to standard PROMIS guidelines. All participants included in the analysis met the MCID threshold for this outcome. Therefore, the number of participants achieving MCID is equal to the number analysed. These values represent actual measured data and are not placeholders.

Time frame:
From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in PROMIS Global10 Score.
ParticipantsEnvironmental Control System Users
Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in PROMIS Global10 Score.5
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving MCID in the PIADS.

The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) is a self-report questionnaire measuring the perceived impact of assistive technology on psychological well-being, functional independence, and quality of life. The outcome measure was the percentage of participants who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the PIADS total score from baseline to post-intervention. The MCID was defined as an improvement of ≥0.5 points on the PIADS scale. Scoring was conducted according to standard PIADS procedures.

Time frame:
From baseline to 8 weeks post installation of the environmental control system.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in the PIADS.
ParticipantsEnvironmental Control System Users
Percentage of Participants Achieving MCID in the PIADS.4

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until the end of follow up, up to 8 weeks post intervention.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Environmental Control System Users0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Environmental Control System Users
Mean60.6 ± 8.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Environmental Control System Users
Female3
Male2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Environmental Control System Users
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Environmental Control System Users
United Kingdom5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • SMART Centre
    Edinburgh, EH9 2HL, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Vessoyan K, Steckle G, Easton B, Nichols M, Mok Siu V, McDougall J. Using eye-tracking technology for communication in Rett syndrome: perceptions of impact. Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Sep;34(3):230-241. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1462848. Epub 2018 Apr 27. PubMed 29703090 ↗
  • Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D, Griffiths P, Mokkink LB. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10. PubMed 34247326 ↗
  • Henderson G, Harris H, Dolan MJ, Hill R. How do environmental control systems affect mental health and psychological well-being? A pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2026 Jul 4:1-10. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2026.2697427. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42400500 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD is not required to be shared.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in May 2025, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2026, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 97 non-industry observational studies under Nervous System Diseases, half reached primary completion within 55 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 150. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 114 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 121.

Nervous System Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2025
First posted
Jul 3, 2025
StartActual
Jan 29, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 27, 2025
CompletionActual
May 27, 2025
Results first posted
Apr 7, 2026
Last update
May 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07049419
Lead sponsor
NHS Lothian
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2025
Start date
Jan 29, 2024
Primary completion
May 27, 2025
Completion
May 27, 2025
Results posted
Apr 7, 2026
Last update
May 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion