ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07098806CA2024-LM-001Updated Nov 5, 2026

Multiple Dose Intraventricular Administration of Rhenium-186 NanoLiposome for Leptomeningeal Metastases

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of 186RNL in Leptomeningeal Metastasis, sponsored by Cerenome. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Cerenome · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Updated Nov 5, 2026Primary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1 study to determine the safety and efficacy of multiple doses at defined intervals of rhenium (186Re) obisbemeda (rhenium-186 nanoliposome, 186RNL) administered via intraventricular catheter for any primary solid tumor cancer with leptomeningeal metastases to identify an MTD/MFD for a given dose, interval duration, and number of doses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Keywords

  • Neoplastic Processes Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms
  • Pathologic Processes
  • Meningeal Neoplasms
  • Central Nervous System Neoplasms
  • Nervous System Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms by Site
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Meningeal Carcinomatosis
03

In context

Meningeal Carcinomatosis

146 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningeal Carcinomatosis; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 30 across 128 interventional studies indexed under Meningeal Carcinomatosis.

Browse Meningeal Carcinomatosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Cerenome is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. At least 18 years of age.
  2. Ability to understand the purposes and risks of the study and has signed a written document approved by the site-specific IRB.
  3. Documented LM from any primary solid tumor cancer per EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (Types I or IIA-C).
  4. performance status of 70 to 100.
  5. Acceptable liver function:

    1. ≤ 1.5 times the .
    2. (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤ 3.0 times the upper limit of normal for subjects with normal liver.
    3. AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤ 5.0 times the upper limit of normal for subjects with liver .
  6. Acceptable renal function:

    a. greater than or equal to 60 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault Equation).

  7. Acceptable hematologic functioning (without hematologic support):

    1. ≥ 1000 cells μL.
    2. count ≥ 75,000/μL.
    3. ≥ 9.0 g/dL.
  8. All women of must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. Male and female subjects must agree to use effective means of (for example, surgical sterilization or the use of barrier contraception with either a condom or diaphragm in conjunction with spermicidal gel or an IUD) with their partner from entry into the study through 6 months after the last dose.
  9. Normal CSF flow and distribution by an accepted CSF flow study (e.g., 111Indium-DTPA or acceptable substitute) before first treatment with the study drug, based on study imaging interpretation and clinical correlation.
  10. are permitted as clinically indicated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject has not recovered to the current National Cancer Institute (NCI) (CTCAE v5.0) Grade ≤1 from adverse events (AEs) due to antineoplastic agents, drugs, or other medications that were administered prior to study, at time of study registration.

    a. Prior AEs due to alopecia, anemia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia are not required to be recovered to Grade ≤1 prior to study registration, assuming other inclusion criteria are satisfied.

  2. to the placement of an intraventricular catheter (i.e., Ommaya reservoir.)
  3. Presence of or need for a Ventriculo-peritoneal or ventriculo-atrial shunt.
  4. Females of who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or may possibly be pregnant, without a negative serum pregnancy test (see inclusion criteria).
  5. Serious intercurrent illnesses, which could interfere with the planned treatment schedule.
  6. Patients who had any therapeutic radiation dose to the whole brain regardless of when the radiation treatment was delivered, except:

    1. Prior radiation dose to the spinal cord and/or cauda equina is allowed if the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was ≤ 30 Gy to the spinal cord and/or cauda equina using α/β ratio of 3 and if prior radiotherapy has been > 14 days and ≤ 6 months, or was ≤45 Gy to the spinal cord and/or cauda equina using α/β ratio of 3 and if prior radiotherapy has been > 6 months.
    2. Prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the brain or partial brain radiotherapy is allowed if the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was ≤ 30 Gy to brainstem and/or optic structures (optic nerves, optic chiasm) using α/β ratio of 3 and if prior radiotherapy has been > 14 days and ≤ 6 months, or was ≤ 45 Gy to the brainstem and/or optic structures (optic nerves, optic chiasm) using α/β ratio of 3 and if prior radiotherapy has been > 6 months.
  7. Prior or concurrent therapy:

    a. Intrathecally delivered therapy: i. Concurrent: Concurrent intrathecal therapy. ii. Prior: Intrathecal therapy given less than 14 days before study registration.

    b. Systemically delivered therapy: i. Concurrent: Systemically delivered therapy UNLESS LM develops while on systemically delivered therapy AND the systemically delivered therapy is NOT associated with more than grade 1 myelosuppression.

    ii. Prior: Systemically delivered therapy given less than 28 days before study registration.

  8. Projected survival of less than 60 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: Multiple Doses

    This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1 study to determine the safety and efficacy of multiple doses at defined intervals of rhenium (186Re) obisbemeda (rhenium-186 nanoliposome, 186RNL) administered via intraventricular catheter for any primary solid tumor cancer with leptomeningeal metastases to identify an MTD/MFD for a given dose, interval duration, and number of doses.

    Drug: 186RNL

Interventions

  • Drug186RNL

    Multiple Doses of 186RNL

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose

    Evaluation of any toxicity associated with research treatment per Common Criteria for Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 13 months

  2. Dose Distribution of 186RNL

    SPECT imaging of the radioactive materials spread in the Cerebrospinal Fluid.

    Time frame: 13 months

  3. Safety and tolerability of multiple dose treatment

    Evaluation of any toxicity associated with research treatment as determined by National Cancer Institute (NCI) common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).

    Time frame: 13 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determine the objective response rate (ORR).

    Determine the overall response rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of all evaluable participants achieving a response as the best overall response at the time of progression.

    Time frame: 13 months

  2. Determine the overall survival (OS).

    The time from first treatment to date of death.

    Time frame: 13 months

  3. Characterize the dosimetry profile of 186RNL.

    using the following equation to calculate the average radiation-absorbed dose in the CSF Volume (Eckerman and Endo 2008): D (Gy) = 7.126 (Gy.g/mCi.h) × A cummu. (mCi.h)/ m (g) D is the average radiation-absorbed dose in Gy. A cummu. is the cumulative radioactivity in mCi.h calculated as described above. m is the weight of the radioactivity distribution volume in grams. Given that there is no specific tumor mass to use for organ mass in grams identifiable post-infusion, the Sponsor proposes to use the estimated total CSF volume to calculate the absorbed dose to the CSF. To perform radiation-absorbed dose calculation, the weight will be calculated from the average CSF volume (Adult Male: 140 ml; Adult Female: 120 ml), assuming the density of 1 g/cm3.

    Time frame: 13 months

  4. Determine neurologic progression-free survival (PFS).

    The time from first treatment to progression.

    Time frame: 13 months

  5. Evaluate Neurologic status by NANO scale

    Neurologic Assessment in Neuro- Oncology (NANO) The NANO scale is a quantifiable evaluation of 9 relevant neurologic domains based on direct observation and testing conducted during routine office visits. The score defines overall response criteria. The scale scores nine domains: gait, strength, ataxia, sensibility, visual fields, facial paralysis, language, level of consciousness, and behavior. Each domain has a score between 0 and 2 or 3, with 0 indicating normal function and higher scores indicating increasing deficits.

    Time frame: 13 months

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory: Assess response using CSF tumor cell enumeration and compare to standard of care cytology.

    Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of CNSide (cell capture and ctDNA) with cytology in diagnosing and monitoring LM and will be described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) (as appropriate statistically).

    Time frame: 13 months

  2. Exploratory: Assess response using pharmacodynamic (PD) markers.

    Determination of DNA damage markers by regression analyses of the time-activity curves will be performed and the residence times of 186RNL in red marrow will be computed using a reduction factor of 0.3 to consider the difference in activity between blood and marrow.

    Time frame: 13 months

  3. Safety: Determination of the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE).

    Safety will be evaluated by the incidence of AEs and SAEs graded according CTCAE version 5.0

    Time frame: 13 months

  4. Safety: Determination of the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT).

    Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) will be evaluated by testing increasing doses with 3 to 6 participants in each cohort. MTD reflects the highest dose of drug that did not cause a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) in \> 33% of participants.

    Time frame: 13 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Cancer Therapy and Research Center at UTHSCSA
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
    Recruiting
    • Leti Velten, RN · Contactvelten@uthscsa.edu · 210-450-1921
    • Andrew Brenner, M.D.,Ph.D · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 24 months after the start.

Primary completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Oct 2026 → Jul 2027, on Nov 5, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2025
First posted
Aug 1, 2025
StartActual
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2027was Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 2, 2031
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2026→Jul 31, 2027
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Primary completion Oct 2, 2026→Jul 31, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07098806
Lead sponsor
Cerenome
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 1, 2025
Start date
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Rachael Hershey
Contact
patients@respect-trials.com
1(210)791-8723
Andrew Brenner, M.D.,Ph.D
Contact
patients@respect-trials.com
1(210)791-8723

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rhenium Re 186 Obisbemeda

Start the discussion