ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07041723BOOSTUpdated Aug 31, 2026

BiOfeedback, Online for Sibilant Treatment

An interventional study of Visual-acoustic biofeedback for Sibilants in Speech Sound Disorder, sponsored by Montclair State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-31.

Sponsored by Montclair State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of sibilant biofeedback treatment delivered via telepractice in six children ages 8:0-17;11 who present with distortions of /s/. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Primary hypothesis: Biofeedback treatment for sibilants delivered via telepractice will produce positive gains compared to a no-treatment baseline phase.
  • Secondary hypothesis: Participants will experience positive changes in social-emotional well-being after receiving biofeedback treatment for sibilants as reported by the participants and their guardians.

Following the initial evaluation, participants will be randomly assigned to transition from baseline to treatment at one of seven possible points, ranging from 4-10 baseline sessions in which /s/ production will be probed but not treated. All participants will then receive 20, 1-hour biofeedback treatment sessions over 10 weeks with a certified Speech-Language Pathologist via teletherapy, followed by three maintenance sessions.

Read the detailed description

Study 2 will evaluate children with residual speech sound disorder affecting /s/ (n = 6). Both male and female children will be recruited. Participants must be between 8;0 and 17;11 years of age at the time of enrollment.

Randomization. Following the initial evaluation to determine eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned to transition from the baseline to the treatment condition at one of 7 possible points, ranging from 4 to 10 baseline sessions in which /s/ production will be probed but not treated. All participants will then receive 20 sessions of /s/ production training over 10 weeks, followed by 3 maintenance sessions.

Intervention Delivery. All treatment will be provided on an individual basis by a certified speech-language pathologist. Treatment will be delivered over Zoom videoconference calls using a unique password-protected room for each participant. In the beginning of each session a standard probe eliciting /s/ in various contexts at the sentence, word and syllable levels will be elicited. Following the /s/ probes, the session will consist of relatively unstructured, highly interactive prepractice for 10 minutes, which is designed to provide instruction on the phonetic requirements for /s/ and shaping strategies to transform the child's current productions into accurate /s/. The remainder of the session will elicit up to 150 syllables/words or 40 minutes of practice, whichever occurs first. Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same item (e.g., 10 /sa/), after which a new item will be addressed (e.g., 10 /se/). Within each block, the clinician will provide qualitative (knowledge of performance) feedback as prompted by the research team's custom open-source software, Challenge Point Program (CPP). The CPP software prompts clinician actions such as delivery of knowledge of performance (KP) feedback, promoting increased fidelity in treatment implementation both within and across sites. It also enables systematic changes in practice difficulty based on participant performance, as follows: after the software presents a stimulus and the participant attempts to produce it, the clinician scores the response as 0 or 1 based on their clinical impression of an incorrect or correct production of /s/. Following each block of ten trials, the software automatically tallies the scores entered by the clinician and uses them to make adaptive changes in practice difficulty. When a participant demonstrates at least 80% cumulative accuracy at the session level, the participants will be advanced from syllable to word-level practice; if the cumulative session-level accuracy drops below 50%, the participants will be dropped back to the syllable level to decrease difficulty. In word-level practice, parameters are adjusted on a rotating basis so that as accuracy increases, either the frequency of feedback is reduced (80%-50%-20%-0%), clinician models are faded, or word shapes increase in complexity. Qualitative feedback (either biofeedback or verbal clinician feedback) will begin at 80% of trials and, contingent upon the participant's performance, will be systematically decreased to 0% .

02

Conditions studied

  • Speech Sound Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • speech intervention
  • biofeedback
  • articulation disorder
  • lisp
03

In context

Speech Sound Disorder

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Speech Sound Disorder; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6 is below the median of 40 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Speech Sound Disorder.

Browse Speech Sound Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Montclair State University is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 8;0 and 17;11 years at the time of enrollment
  • English as the dominant language (must have begun learning English by age 3, per parent report)
  • Passes pure-tone hearing screening at 30 dB hearing level
  • Passes brief examination of oral structure and function
  • Less than 30% accuracy, based on consensus across 2 trained listeners, on a probe list eliciting fricative /s, z/ in various phonetic contexts at the word level
  • No more than 3 sounds other than /s/ in error on the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3)
  • Diagnosis of ADHD, learning disability, dyslexia, or neurodiversity is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1
  • History of CAS is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1
  • Braces and removable retainers are admissible
  • Access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scaled score of 7 or higher on the Recalling Sentences and Formulated Sentences subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5)
  • History of permanent hearing loss (temporary hearing loss due to otitis media, including recurrent OM/tubes, is admissible)
  • History of developmental disorder (e.g., Down syndrome, cerebral palsy)
  • History of major brain injury, surgery, or stroke in the past year (mild concussion is admissible)
  • Active diagnosis of epilepsy or other neurological disorder (permissible if well-controlled for at least 6 months)
  • Current diagnosis of voice or fluency disorder
  • Current presence of orthodontia that crosses the palate (braces and removable retainers are admissible)
  • Lack of access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Visual acoustic biofeedback

    Visual-acoustic biofeedback using the the SonaSpeech II software running the Sona Match module with the real-time FFT function.

    Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback for Sibilants

Interventions

  • BehavioralVisual-acoustic biofeedback for Sibilants

    Participants will view a real-time FFT spectrum and will be cued to match a visual target for /s/ where the spectral energy is concentrated to the right side of the display, primarily in the 5000-10,000 Hz region of the spectrum. Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same item (e.g., 10 /sa/), after which a new item will be addressed (e.g., 10 /se/). Within each block, the clinician will provide qualitative (knowledge of performance) feedback as prompted by the research team's custom open-source software, Challenge Point Program (CPP). The CPP software prompts clinician actions such as delivery of knowledge of performance (KP) feedback. Following each block of ten trials, the software automatically tallies the scores entered by the clinician and uses the summed scores to make adaptive changes in practice difficulty.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceptually rated accuracy of /s/ production

    To assess generalization of perceptual training to production, participants will be assessed with standard probes administered in the first three baseline sessions , at the start of each treatment session and in three post-treatment maintenance sessions. Probes will elicit 60 words \[considered the primary target\], containing /s, z/ in various phonetic contexts. Stimuli in each probe will be presented individually in randomized order. No auditory models will be provided; for children with reading difficulty, semantic cues will be provided to elicit the intended word. Individual words will be isolated from the audio record of each word probe and presented in randomized order for binary rating (correct/incorrect) by 4 trained listeners who are blind to treatment condition and time point (but will see the written representation of each target word). The proportion of "correct" ratings for each token will be used as the measure of perceptually rated accuracy.

    Time frame: Standard word probes will be elicited at baseline and post treatment (after 20 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survey evaluating impacts of treatment on participants' socio-emotional well-being

    This 11-item survey, which asks parents to report the impact of speech disorder on the child's social, emotional, and academic well-being, was validated in a published study by members of the research team. An impact score, calculated as described in the research team's previous research, will be used as the primary measure of socio-emotional well-being.

    Time frame: The survey will be administered at baseline and post-treatment (after 20 weeks).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hitchcock ER, Ochs LC, Swartz MT, Leece MC, Preston JL, McAllister T. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 11;32(1):18-36. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jan 9. PubMed 36623212 ↗
  • Shriberg, L.D., R. Paul, and P. Flipsen, Childhood speech sound disorders: From crow to the postgenomic era. Speech sound disorders in children, 2009: p. 1-33.
  • Kraljevic JK, Matic A, Dokoza KP. Telepractice as a Reaction to the COVID-19 Crisis: Insights from Croatian SLP Settings. Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Dec 8;12(2):93-104. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6325. PubMed 33520098 ↗
  • Whitehead E, Dorfman V, Tremper G, Kramer A, Sigler A, Gosman A. Telemedicine as a means of effective speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):415-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b6897. PubMed 22421491 ↗
  • Lincoln M, Hines M, Fairweather C, Ramsden R, Martinovich J. Multiple stakeholder perspectives on teletherapy delivery of speech pathology services in rural schools: a preliminary, qualitative investigation. Int J Telerehabil. 2015 Jan 29;6(2):65-74. doi: 10.5195/IJT.2014.6155. eCollection 2014 Fall. PubMed 25945230 ↗
  • Wales D, Skinner L, Hayman M. The Efficacy of Telehealth-Delivered Speech and Language Intervention for Primary School-Age Children: A Systematic Review. Int J Telerehabil. 2017 Jun 29;9(1):55-70. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6219. eCollection 2017 Spring. PubMed 28814995 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Speech Sound Disorder, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 4, 2025
First posted
Jun 27, 2025
StartActual
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Aug 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07041723
Lead sponsor
Montclair State University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2025
Start date
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2026

Study contacts

Elaine R. Hitchcock, PhD
Contact
hitchcocke@montclair.edu
19732293797 ext. 973 655-7355

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion