ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06517225VISITUpdated Nov 3, 2026

Visual-acoustic Intervention With Service Delivery In-person and Via Telepractice Trial

A Phase 2 interventional study of Visual-acoustic biofeedback in Speech Sound Disorder, sponsored by New York University. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 9 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by New York University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 17 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Children with speech sound disorder show diminished intelligibility in spoken communication and may thus be perceived as less capable than peers, with negative consequences for both socioemotional and socioeconomic outcomes. New technologies have the potential to transform interventions for speech sound disorder, but there is a lack of rigorous evidence to substantiate this promise. This research will meet a public health need by systematically evaluating the efficacy of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention delivered in-person versus via telepractice.

The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that treatment incorporating visual-acoustic biofeedback can be delivered via telepractice without a significant loss of efficacy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive identical treatment either via online telepractice or in the laboratory setting. The same software for visual-acoustic biofeedback, staRt, will be used in both conditions. Participants' progress in treatment will be evaluated based on blinded listeners' perceptual ratings of probes produced before and after treatment. Pre and post treatment evaluations will be carried out in person for all participants.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to test the working hypothesis that biofeedback treatment delivery via telepractice will not be associated with a reduction in efficacy that exceeds a maximum acceptable value determined a priori. In a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, children will be randomly assigned to receive a standard course of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention delivered in-person or via telepractice. Progress will be measured with blinded listeners' ratings of untreated words produced before and after treatment. A survey will also be administered before and after treatment to assess changes in participants' participation and socio-emotional well-being, as well as participants' and caregivers' satisfaction with the therapy experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Speech Sound Disorder

Keywords

  • speech
  • articulation
  • motor development
03

In context

Speech Sound Disorder

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Speech Sound Disorder; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 76 is above the median of 40 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Speech Sound Disorder.

Browse Speech Sound Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

New York University is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be between 9;0 and 17;11 (years;months) old at the time of enrollment.
  • Must speak English as the dominant or equally dominant language
  • Must have begun learning English by age 3, per parent report.
  • Must hear a rhotic dialect of English from at least one speaker in the home if the home language is English.
  • Must pass a pure-tone hearing screening.
  • Must pass a brief examination of oral structure and function.
  • Must exhibit less than thirty percent accuracy, based on trained listener ratings, on a probe list eliciting /r/ in various phonetic contexts at the word level.
  • Must demonstrate age-appropriate receptive and expressive language abilities on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5).
  • Must have access to a laptop or desktop computer for study sessions in the event of randomization to the telepractice condition.
  • Must have home wifi sufficient to support video calls in the event of randomization to the telepractice condition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must not exhibit voice or fluency disorder of a severity judged likely to interfere with the ability to participate in study activities.
  • Must not currently have orthodontia that crosses the palate and cannot be removed.
  • Must not have history of permanent hearing loss.
  • Must not have an existing diagnosis of developmental disability such as cerebral palsy or Down Syndrome.
  • Must not have history of major brain injury, surgery, or stroke in the past year.
  • Must not have epilepsy with active seizure incidents with in the past 6 months.
  • Must not show signs of apraxia of speech or dysarthria.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telepractice delivery

    Participants will receive visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment from a clinician in a private, password-protected WebRTC room.

    Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback

  • Active comparator
    In-person delivery

    Participants will receive visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment from a clinician in a private room in research space at one of the two clinical research sites.

    Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback

Interventions

  • BehavioralVisual-acoustic biofeedback

    Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback In visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment, the elements of traditional treatment (auditory models and verbal descriptions of articulator placement) are enhanced with a dynamic display of the speech signal in the form of the real-time LPC (Linear Predictive Coding) spectrum. The web-based software staRt will be used for intervention delivery.

    Also known as: staRt app

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of "Correct" Ratings by Blinded Untrained Listeners for /r/ Sounds Produced in Word Probes

    To assess generalization of treatment gains to untreated words, participants will be assessed with standard probes (30 words \[considered the primary target\], 20 syllables, and 10 sentences containing /r/ in various phonetic contexts). Stimuli in each probe will be presented individually in randomized order with blocking by stimulus type (word, syllable, sentence). Individual words will be isolated from the audio record of each word probe and presented in randomized order for binary rating (correct/incorrect) by 9 untrained listeners who are blind to treatment condition and time point, but will see the written representation of each target word. The proportion of "correct" ratings for each token will be used as the primary measure of perceptually rated accuracy.

    Time frame: Before the initiation of treatment and again after the end of all treatment (10 weeks later)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1. Survey evaluating impacts of speech disorder on participants' social, emotional, and academic well-being.

    This survey asks participants to report the impact of speech disorder on their child's social, emotional, and academic well-being. Parents are asked to circle a number from 1 to 5. For all questions, a higher score indicates a greater degree of negative impact of speech disorder on social, emotional, or academic well-being. An impact score will be calculated as described in a previous published study (Hitchcock, Harel, \& McAllister Byun, 2015).

    Time frame: Before the initiation of treatment and again after the end of all treatment (10 weeks later)

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayala SA, Eads A, Kabakoff H, Swartz MT, Shiller DM, Hill J, Hitchcock ER, Preston JL, McAllister T. Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1252-1273. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00496. Epub 2023 Mar 17. PubMed 36930986 ↗
  • Benway NR, Preston JL, Hitchcock E, Rose Y, Salekin A, Liang W, McAllister T. Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence-Ready PERCEPT Corpora. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):1986-2009. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00343. Epub 2023 Jun 15. PubMed 37319018 ↗
  • Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun T. Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):635-643. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PubMed 28795872 ↗
  • Campbell H, McAllister Byun T. Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children's non-rhotic vowels. Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(1):70-87. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898. Epub 2017 Jul 13. PubMed 28703653 ↗
  • Harel D, Hitchcock ER, Szeredi D, Ortiz J, McAllister Byun T. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(1):104-117. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1174306. Epub 2016 Jun 7. PubMed 27267258 ↗
  • Hitchcock ER, Ochs LC, Swartz MT, Leece MC, Preston JL, McAllister T. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 11;32(1):18-36. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jan 9. PubMed 36623212 ↗
  • Hitchcock ER, Harel D, Byun TM. Social, Emotional, and Academic Impact of Residual Speech Errors in School-Aged Children: A Survey Study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):283-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562911. Epub 2015 Oct 12. PubMed 26458203 ↗
  • Hitchcock ER, Byun TM. Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Jan;29(1):59-75. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.956232. Epub 2014 Sep 12. PubMed 25216375 ↗
  • McAllister Byun T. Efficacy of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors: A Single-Subject Randomization Study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1175-1193. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0038. PubMed 28389677 ↗
  • McAllister Byun T, Campbell H. Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 11;10:567. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00567. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27891084 ↗
  • McAllister Byun T, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study. J Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;53:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 15. PubMed 25578293 ↗
  • Byun TM, Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT. Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2116-30. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034. PubMed 25088034 ↗
  • Byun TM, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):207-21. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083). Epub 2012 Mar 21. PubMed 22442281 ↗
  • Peterson L, Savarese C, Campbell T, Ma Z, Simpson KO, McAllister T. Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Apr 11;53(2):256-274. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084. Epub 2022 Jan 20. PubMed 35050705 ↗
  • Preston JL, McAllister T, Phillips E, Boyce S, Tiede M, Kim JS, Whalen DH. Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Aug 8;61(8):1875-1892. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0441. PubMed 30073249 ↗
  • Preston JL, Holliman-Lopez G, Leece MC. Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 May 3;27(2):813-818. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0121. PubMed 29546269 ↗
  • Preston JL, McAllister Byun T, Boyce SE, Hamilton S, Tiede M, Phillips E, Rivera-Campos A, Whalen DH. Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors. J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 3;(119):55123. doi: 10.3791/55123. PubMed 28117824 ↗
  • McAllister T, Preston JL, Hitchcock ER, Benway NR, Hill J. Protocol for visual-acoustic intervention with service delivery in-person and via telepractice (VISIT) non-inferiority trial for residual speech sound disorder. BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05364-z. PubMed 39871189 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A manual of procedures and materials for treatment and clinician training will be released through the Open Science Framework (OSF). Complete de-identified data and analysis scripts on OSF will also be released when the study is completed. OSF as projects are completed

Supporting information: Study protocol, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be shared within 6 months of the study end date (7/31/28) and will be made available indefinitely.

Access criteria: Publicly accessible

Data sharing details ↗ · osf.io

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 47 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 18, 2024
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
StartActual
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06517225
Collaborators
Syracuse University, Montclair State University, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion