A Phase 2 interventional study of Polypill in Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.
Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 265 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in United States — 14 open to participants now, 21 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Acute Coronary Syndrome · United States.
Among the 265 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in United States, this one is the 47th largest by planned enrollment of the 186 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2025, is one of 29 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 20 of the 20 other live ones, and was the 261st registered.
1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.
Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →14 of the 265 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Teleflex · Sites in United States, Latvia
Ages 18–80
Shanghai CureGene Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Sites in United States
Ages 18–55 · Healthy volunteers
Columbia University · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
University of South Florida · Sites in United States
Ages 18+
Abcentra · Sites in United States, Czechia, Hungary and 6 more countries
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 196 Acute Coronary Syndrome studies recruiting now, 144 (73%) set no upper age limit and 19 (10%) stop at 75 or younger; 14 take children under 18; 15 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
265 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 16 · Phase 2 36 · Phase 3 41 · Phase 4 27
First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2025.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 200 across 865 interventional studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Median enrollment 150 across the 186 interventional studies, 500 across the 79 observational. Of the 214 that completed or were terminated, 97 (45%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
91 of 265 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.
Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center has 3 studies filed under Acute Coronary Syndrome — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
7 of the studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 1 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05918861Phase 3DalCor PharmaceuticalsEffect of Dalcetrapib on CV Risk in a Genetically Defined Population With a Recent ACS | 2027-08 |
| NCT06481943SB Technology, Inc.A Prospective Research Investigation of Ischemia Using MCG | 2026-12 |
| NCT05412927Angel Medical SystemsAngelMed Guardian® System PMA Post Approval Study | 2026-12 |
| NCT04496687SCAD AllianceInternational Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) "iSCAD" Registry | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT06927739AbcentraFocused Orticumab Research for Treating Inflammation in Coronary Arteries | 2027-02-08 |
Add all 7 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 265 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The current study aims to investigate whether combining the standard medications prescribed after acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, and statins-into a single polypill can improve outcomes following an ACS event. Although these therapies are effective, gaps in adherence and uptake significantly contribute to risk or adverse events in the post-ACS period. This study is designed as a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a polypill-based strategy for treatment of ACS.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses a major public health challenge in the United States. ACS, a constellation of acute cardiovascular conditions including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina, is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality across the United States. An American will suffer from an ACS event every 40 seconds, and \~1 million individuals have an ACS event annually. The absolute 30-day and 1-year mortality rates following an ACS event have remained high over the past several years. Myocardial infarction, a component of ACS, is one of the five most expensive admission diagnoses, with an estimated cost to the US health system of $12.1 billion annually.
The risk of major adverse cardiac events or death is high in the immediate post-ACS period. Despite effective pharmacotherapies and early revascularization, patients with ACS remain at an increased risk of post-MI complications, including recurrent ischemic events, heart failure, mechanical complications, and death in the first few weeks following the index event. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is six-fold higher within the first 30 days compared with one-year post-discharge from the index MI event (41% vs. 6.4%, annualized).The 30-day risk-adjusted mortality following an ACS event in the U.S. is among the highest among developed countries, ranging from 12% (NSTEMI) to 18% (STEMI). These observations highlight the need for more aggressive implementation of evidence-based therapies in the post-ACS period.
Significant gaps exist in the optimal utilization of evidence-based therapies post-ACS. Treatment for ACS includes urgent revascularization followed by initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which includes aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and a high-intensity statin. While rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following an ACS event have increased substantially over the past two decades, utilization of evidence-based medical therapies, specifically DAPT and high-intensity statin therapy, in the post-MI period are suboptimal. Low utilization rates may reflect physician factors (such as inadequate prescribing) and/or patient factors (low adherence). Evidence from clinical registries suggests that low adherence may play the larger role, as the vast majority of post-ACS patients are prescribed DAPT and statins (>90% prescription rates). For example, in the TRANSLATE-ACS registry, a multicenter study of MI patients treated with PCI, approximately one-third of patients reported suboptimal adherence to prescribed cardiovascular medications in the first six weeks after their hospitalization. Similarly, in the multicenter ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines) cohort of \~20,000 patients with ACS, the rates of non-adherence to P2Y12 and statin therapy within 90 days of the index event, assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC), was 28% and 37%, respectively. Furthermore, non-adherence rates increase over time, reaching up to 50% by 12 months following the index ACS event.
Premature discontinuation of evidence-based therapies following an ACS event markedly increases the risk of an adverse event. Discontinuation of cardiac medications is associated with an increased risk of in-stent thrombosis, recurrent MI, and death, making optimal adherence in the subacute phase after ACS critical. For instance, among patients with an ACS event treated with a drug-eluting stent, premature discontinuation of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is associated with a 9-fold higher risk of death. In-stent thrombosis is a severe complication with up to 45% risk of mortality, and the highest risk is within 30 days after stent placement. Discontinuing statin therapy after MI is associated with a 3-fold higher risk of death over a 1-year follow-up period.
There are important disparities in ACS outcomes by race and socioeconomic status. While the overall incidence of MI has declined over time, racial/ethnic disparities have persisted, with a higher risk of adverse outcomes among ACS patients of self-reported Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity. Black and Hispanic patients who present with ACS are younger on average and more likely to be uninsured and have less education. The risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality following an ACS event is significantly higher among patients of self-reported Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity (vs. white). In addition to racial/ethnic disparities, significant disparities in ACS outcomes have also been reported based on socioeconomic status. Specifically, individuals with low (vs. high) income or education levels and those living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods have a higher risk of adverse outcomes following an ACS event. These disparities are driven by poor access to care, lower rates of revascularization, and less use of evidence-based therapies following an ACS.
DAPT and high-intensity statin utilization rates following an ACS event are lowest in patients from under-represented minority groups. Prior studies have demonstrated up to 20% lower adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors among patients of Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity within the six months following an ACS event. In addition, financial hardship and low SES are associated with lower self-reported adherence to evidence-based therapies within six weeks of an ACS. These data highlight the need for novel approaches to improve adherence to evidence-based therapies following an ACS event among Black and Hispanic individuals and those with socioeconomic disadvantages.
Polypill-based strategies reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in the primary and secondary prevention setting. Low-dose, multi-drug combinations of cardiovascular therapies have been examined to prevent cardiovascular outcomes in multiple primary and secondary prevention trials, including HOPE-3, TIPS-3, the PolyIran study, and most recently, the SECURE trial. It has been proposed that the benefits of a polypill approach are attributable to better patient adherence and reduced physician inertia. In the SECURE trial, patients with recent MI who were treated with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin had a \~25% lower risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or urgent coronary revascularization. Further, improvements in medication adherence and treatment satisfaction were documented in the polypill group compared with usual care.
Our research group has previously shown that a polypill-based strategy is feasible in low-income populations. Our group completed the largest U.S. trial to date investigating a polypill approach for the primary prevention of heart disease. In this trial, individuals at a federally-qualified community health center were randomized to a polypill versus usual care. Individuals in the polypill group had significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (-7 mm Hg, 95% CI: -2 to -12; p=0.003) and LDL cholesterol (-11 mg/dl, 95% CI: -5 to -18; p=0.0003), compared with those randomized to usual care. Two-thirds of participants had an income \< $15,000.
While prior studies have demonstrated the efficacy of a polypill-based strategy in primary and secondary prevention, the polypill has not been evaluated for managing patients in the post-ACS setting. Patients are particularly vulnerable in the subacute period immediately following an ACS hospitalization due to the risk of stent thrombosis or other ischemic events. Moreover, prior polypill trials in the secondary prevention setting have focused on anti-hypertensive drugs, aspirin, and statins. Thus, there is a critical implementation gap related to non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors, one of the most essential therapies for managing ACS patients in the post-PCI subacute phase.
Given the significant pill burden for post-ACS patients, a polypill approach for patients in the subacute period following PCI may have substantial advantages. Thus, will conduct a pragmatic, open-label, Type 1 hybrid efficacy-implementation, multicenter clinical trial of a polypill-based strategy in post-ACS patients. The polypill will consist of a high-intensity statin, aspirin 81 mg, and a P2Y12 inhibitor.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The polypill combines DAPT and a high intensity statin: (a) aspirin 81 mg, (b) rosuvastatin (40 or 10 mg) and (c) prasugrel 10 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg.
Combination Product: Polypill
Participants in the usual care arm will be prescribed DAPT and statins as standard therapy in individual pills.
The polypill is an inert capsule designed to combine multiple individual medications into a convenient, once-daily pill. In this case it will include DAPT and a statin.
Win ratio
The win ratio will include all-cause death, in-stent thrombosis, ischemic events (MI, hospitalization for unstable angina, unplanned revascularization), and bleeding events (hospitalization or ED visit for bleeding, red blood cell transfusion, or a bleeding event that leads to cessation of DAPT)
Time frame: 6-months
Medication adherence
Medication adherence will be evaluated with the Morisky Medication Adherence Score (MMAS) and pill counts
Time frame: 6-months
Treatment satisfaction
Treatment satisfaction will be measured using the validated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
Time frame: 6-months
Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided
Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2030, 53 months after the start.
Of 30 phase 2 interventional studies under Acute Coronary Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 53 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center →