ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06996561NalUpdated Apr 15, 2026

Exploring the Impact of Genetic Variations on The Clinical Efficacy of Nalbuphine in Postoperative Pain Management

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Nalbuphine Injection and Next Generation Sequencing in Cholecystectomy, Hernia, Abdominal and Appendectomy, sponsored by Dr. Asma Abdus Salam. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Sponsored by Dr. Asma Abdus Salam · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
263
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to identify the genes as well as their association with Nalbuphine. This will help the investigator to identify opioid vulnerability in Pakistani population in the postoperative patients and will contribute to overcoming the opioid crisis, resulting in better and safer outcomes.

Research question is:

Is there any association between the underlying genetic variations and the analgesic efficacy of Nalbuphine in postoperative patients? The Research Objectives are

  1. To identify the underlying genes in postoperative patients having pain.
  2. To find an association between identified genes and nalbuphine clinical efficacy.

Procedure: After the written informed consent adult men and women will be enrolled in the study. On the day of surgery in the preoperative area, a 5 ml blood sample will be drawn before surgery and will be sent to laboratory for analysis. After routine hemodynamic monitoring in the operative room, general anesthesia will be given including nalbuphine. Standard routine anesthesia monitoring will be done and maintained while monitoring heart rate, ECG, NIBP oxygen saturation, ETCO2 and temperature. Incremental analgesia will be provided whenever needed. After extubation and shifting to recovery room the 2nd sample of blood will be taken and will be sent for analysis. Pain score, nausea vomiting, sedation, requirement of analgesia will be assessed till 24 hours postoperatively.

Read the detailed description

The available data suggests that nalbuphine, tramadol, and morphine exhibit comparable efficacy in treating moderate to severe postoperative pain. However, significant individual variations exist in the analgesic response, which can be attributed to genetic differences. These are the variations that are influenced by a combination of demographic, clinical, and environmental factors with a significant contribution from genetic factors that regulate receptor function and signal transduction. Due to the limited availability of morphine, nalbuphine is an extensively used alternative for managing intraoperative and postoperative pain in many LMICs, particularly in Pakistan. While nalbuphine is clinically effective, there is a gap in understanding the molecular factors that contribute to its efficacy in this genetically distinct population. This highlights the need to investigate the genetic variability and to establish the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine within Pakistani population. There is no molecular data from the region where the investigator belongs, which highlights the importance of genetic testing to tailor opioid therapy to individual needs, optimizing pain management while minimizing risks such as overdose or inadequate pain relief. By implementing genetics into clinical practice, the investigator can offer more personalized, effective, and safer opioid use, addressing the challenges associated with opioid therapy in diverse patient populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Hernia, Abdominal
  • Appendectomy
  • Open Colorectal Surgery
  • Laparatomy
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Hysterectomy
  • Cystectomy

Keywords

  • genetic variations
  • nalbuphine
  • opioids
  • polymorphism
03

In context

Hernia, Abdominal

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Abdominal; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 263 is above the median of 90 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Abdominal.

Browse Hernia, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr. Asma Abdus Salam as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All adult men or women
  2. Age 18 to 70 years
  3. ASA criteria 1,2 and 3
  4. Abdomino-pelvic surgeries (open hernia repair, appendicectomy, open cholecystectomy, laparotomy, hysterectomy, cystectomy) lasting 2-4 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Surgical procedure duration lasting more than 4 hours
  2. Patients taking anti fungal fluconazole, anticoagulant (Warfarin or Clopidogrel) SNRI (Amitryptalline), Rifampicin or Buprenorphine,
  3. History of or allergy to opioids,
  4. Pregnant or breastfeeding mothers,
  5. History of narcotic dependency, addiction, and withdrawal
  6. Patients experiencing any adverse side effects or complications during surgical procedure requiring intensive care admission
  7. Refusing to participate in the study
  8. Surgical procedures utilizing other modes of intraoperative analgesia e.g epidural analgesia or nerve blocks
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
263 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    nalbuphine

    Given as intravenously, 0.1-0.2 mg / kg at induction and intermittently

    Drug: Nalbuphine Injection · Genetic: Next Generation Sequencing · Genetic: whole exome sequencing

Interventions

  • Anaesthesia induction will be done with propofol (2 mg/kg) nalbuphine (0.1mg/kg) and atracurium (0.6mg/kg) intravenously. Maintenance of anaesthesia will be achieved with oxygen (O2), nitrous oxide (N2O) in 1:2 ratio and isoflurane (0.8-1%). Intermittent top up of the study drug 1-2 ml boluses will be administered if either the patient's HR or BP increased to 20 % above baseline and when other causes of tachycardia and hypertension are excluded. Timing of analgesia will be recorded. Pain will be assessed for 24 hours postoperatively using verbal rating scale (VRS) with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain. Sedation will be assessed as 0=no sedation, 1= mild sedation, (eye-opening on verbal commands), 2= moderate sedation (eye-opening on painful stimulus), 3= deep sedation (not waking up on pain). All patients will be prescribed paracetamol one gram IV six hourly and nalbuphine 1-2 mg IV infusion in the first 24 hours post operatively.

  • GeneticNext Generation Sequencing

    5ml of blood samples by venipuncture will be obtained from the first 70 patients half an hour before extubation at the time of muscle closure. These blood samples will be processed for DNA analysis. Only the 15 samples where pain persisted despite nalbuphine administration, with a pain score remaining above 4, continuous use of rescue analgesia, or any documented opioid side effects (such as nausea, vomiting, or sedation), or the need for additional analgesia within 24 hours, will be sent for NGS analysis. These samples will undergo whole exome sequencing via NGS, based on patient parameters and pain scores, after being categorized as responders or non-responders to nalbuphine

    Also known as: NGS, whole exome sequencing, sanger's technique

  • Geneticwhole exome sequencing

    Only the 15 samples will be sent for NGS based on patient parameters and pain scores after being categorized as responders or non-responders to nalbuphine

    Also known as: NGS, next generation sequencing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain score

    Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. sedation score

    Sedation will be assessed as 0=no sedation, 1= mild sedation, (eye-opening on verbal commands), 2= moderate sedation (eye-opening on painful stimulus), 3= deep sedation (not waking up on pain).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. nausea vomiting score

    o as no nausea and vomiting and 3 as continous vomiting despite giving antiemetic

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  3. rescue analgesia

    How much nalbuphine ( opioid) in mg was needed in 24 hours. will signify those not responding to conventional analgesia

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Agarwal D, Udoji MA, Trescot A. Genetic Testing for Opioid Pain Management: A Primer. Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):93-105. doi: 10.1007/s40122-017-0069-2. Epub 2017 Apr 13. PubMed 28409480 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — only IPD used in the results publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results

Access criteria: A data sharing agreement must be signed. Consent and permission should be taken from the PI and officials of Ziauddin for further publication

Data sharing details ↗ · zu.edu.pk

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2025
First posted
May 30, 2025
StartActual
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Apr 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06996561
Lead sponsor
Dr. Asma Abdus Salam
Responsible party
Dr. Asma Abdus Salam (Assistant Professor, Ziauddin University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 30, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

Asma Abdus Salam, FCPS, MCPS, MBBS
Contact
asma.salam.azhar@gmail.com
+923002122264
Zulfiqar Omrani, Director ORIC
Contact
director.oric@zu.edu.pk
+9235862937
Talat Mirza, FCPS PhD
study director · Ziauddin University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nalbuphine

Start the discussion