ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06974019EPIC2Updated May 15, 2025

Empathy Through Pain Control: Buffered Compared to Unbuffered 1% Lidocaine During IUD Placement

An interventional study of Buffered Lidocaine and Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution in Contraception, Pain, Acute and Anesthesia, Local, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this research study is to learn more about how different uses of a numbing medication might affect pain levels while getting an IUD placed. The investigators are also studying patients' opinions of their clinicians' empathy.

The investigators are inviting patients who have never given birth who arrive at their clinic visit seeking an IUD.

Usually, at University of California, San Diego (UCSD), for patients who have never delivered, clinicians numb both the sides of the cervix with a lidocaine-based paracervical block. The purpose of this research study is to compare perceptions of pain between buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) vs. unbuffered paracervical block (20 cc 1% lidocaine) during IUD placement for nulliparous women.

Read the detailed description

Lidocaine is a drug that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sodium bicarbonate is an additive that buffers the acidity of lidocaine. The combination of the two is safe and effective as a paracervical block for pain relief in various OBGYN procedures. At UCSD and other places, it is currently standard practice for people with no prior deliveries to receive a buffered lidocaine paracervical block prior to IUD placement.

Participants who take part in this study, will be randomly assigned to receive an injection of buffered lidocaine OR an injection of unbuffered lidocaine to numb the area before IUD placement.

Throughout the local anesthetic and intrauterine device (IUD) placement procedure, research team members will question participants about their pain levels, their satisfaction with the procedure, and how much empathy they feel the clinician has shown.

02

Conditions studied

  • Contraception
  • Pain, Acute
  • Anesthesia, Local

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acute Pain

908 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 154 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 68 is below the median of 87 across 759 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 975 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 71 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Ability to provide informed consent
  2. Women IUD placement for contraception or heavy menstrual bleeding
  3. Ages 18-50
  4. English-speaking
  5. Participants must not have a past medical history of substance use disorders, pain disorders, use of prescription pain medications or are found to be pregnant
  6. Nulliparous (never given birth)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of ever giving birth
  2. Current use of prescription pain medication prior to procedure. Over-the-counter medications such as those containing ibuprofen, aspirin, acetaminophen, or naproxen are allowed.
  3. Diagnosed chronic pain condition
  4. Current pregnancy
  5. Known allergic reactions to components of the local anesthetic
  6. History of an IUD placement
  7. Current substance use or history of substance use
  8. Known contraindications to IUD, such as unexplained vaginal bleeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
68 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Buffered lidocaine paracervical block

    Experimental groups: will receive a 20-mL buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) paracervical block administered before IUD placement.

    Drug: Buffered Lidocaine

  • Active comparator
    Unbuffered lidocaine paracervical block

    Active comparator group: will receive a 20-mL unbuffered (20 cc of 1% lidocaine) paracervical block administered before IUD placement.

    Drug: Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution

Interventions

  • To determine if a 20 cc buffered (2 cc of sodium bicarbonate, 18 cc of 1% lidocaine) lidocaine paracervical block decreases pain with IUD placement in nulliparous women

  • To determine if the unbuffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block offers any less pain control with IUD placement for nulliparous women

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain scores during IUD placement procedure

    Does buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block decrease pain during IUD placement procedures among nulliparous women? Pain will be measured on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with score points ranging from 0-10, where 0 means "No pain" and 10 means "Worst pain possible."

    Time frame: From speculum placement to 5 minutes post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient perceptions of clinician empathy

    What is the relationship between pain and feelings about clinician empathy? Empathy will be measured through answers to the 10-question Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure. Each question is answered by a 5-point scale of how well the patient believes their clinician to be at various types of empathetic gestures, where 1 equals "poor" and 5 equals "excellent."

    Time frame: From pre-procedure baseline to 5 minutes post-procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chin J, Kaneshiro B, Elia J, Raidoo S, Savala M, Soon R. Buffered lidocaine for paracervical blocks in first-trimester abortions: a randomized controlled trial. Contracept X. 2020 Oct 18;2:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100044. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33196038 ↗
  • Azizkhani R, Forghani M, Maghami-Mehr A, Masomi B. The effects of injections of warmed bicarbonate-buffered Lidocaine as a painkiller for patients with trauma. J Inj Violence Res. 2015 Jul;7(2):87-8. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v7i2.523. Epub 2013 Dec 12. No abstract available. PubMed 24879075 ↗
  • Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790. PubMed 30095776 ↗
  • Welch MN, Czyz CN, Kalwerisky K, Holck DE, Mihora LD. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia. Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6. PubMed 22771049 ↗
  • Narvaez J, Wessels I, Bacon G, Chin VR, Baqai WK, Zimmerman GJ. Prospective randomized evaluation of short-term complications when using buffered or unbuffered lidocaine 1% with epinephrine for blepharoplasty surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):33-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b80c13. PubMed 20090482 ↗
  • Hobeich P, Simon S, Schneiderman E, He J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations. J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20. PubMed 23611375 ↗
  • Harreld TK, Fowler S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Efficacy of a Buffered 4% Lidocaine Formulation for Incision and Drainage: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Oct;41(10):1583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 4. PubMed 26253800 ↗
  • Maguire K, Davis A, Rosario Tejeda L, Westhoff C. Intracervical lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 9. PubMed 22325115 ↗
  • Allen RH, Raker C, Goyal V. Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 1. PubMed 24012096 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2025; primary completion for Jun 2027, 24 months later.

Of 314 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acute Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 22. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 318 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 22.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2025
First posted
May 15, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
Last update
May 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06974019
Responsible party
Sheila Mody (Professor, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Marisa Hildebrand, MPH
Contact
mchildeb@health.ucsd.edu
(858) 657-8745
Sheila K Mody, MD, MPH
principal investigator · UC San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Buffered Lidocaine

Start the discussion