ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06966830Updated May 30, 2025

Lacosamide Intravenous Injection for Emergency Termination of Status Epilepticus

An observational study in Epilepsy and Status Epilepticus, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
4 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Status epilepticus (SE) is an acute and critical form of neurological and systemic diseases involving multiple clinical disciplines, with an annual incidence of (20-73) per 100,000 people and a clinical case fatality rate of 20%. Although there are many causes of SE, the primary goal of treatment is to terminate the seizures quickly, and timely and standardized treatment can reduce mortality and improve prognosis. The prognosis is closely related to the duration of the episode, and the longer the episode, the worse the prognosis. If seizures of convulsive status epilepticus persist for more than 10 minutes and are not provided with optimal therapeutic intervention, serious adverse outcomes and even death are likely to occur. How to effectively terminate status epilepticus and actively find effective, reliable and safe treatment options is a key research problem at present. Due to critical illness, limited treatment options, and poor prognosis, new treatments are urgently needed to terminate persistent epileptic activity.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation new antiepileptic drug, which was approved in 2008 for the additive treatment of patients aged 16 years and older with focal seizures, with or without generalized seizures. In 2017, it was extended to patients over 4 years of age. Lacosamide is an anticonvulsant drug with a new dual mechanism of action: first, lacosamide antagonizes the glycine site of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor; Second, lacosamide selectively acts on the slow inactivation of sodium channels and prolongs the inactivation time of sodium channels, which can more effectively reduce sodium influx and reduce the excitability of neurons, so as to achieve the purpose of treating epilepsy. Lacosamide exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, high oral bioavailability, protein binding of \< 15%, rapid and almost complete absorption in a single oral dose, and maximum plasma concentrations within 1 to 4 hours. A number of randomized controlled clinical studies and real-world studies abroad have shown that lacosamide can significantly improve the effective rate and seizure-free rate of epilepsy control, and it is well tolerated and has fewer adverse reactions. The 2022 Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Post-stroke Epilepsy recommended lacosamide injection as a first-line drug for non-convulsive status epilepticus after stroke, and the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Status Epilepticus in Children (2022) recommended that lacosamide be considered as an additive treatment for refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children > 60 minutes . There is a lack of clinical research data on the efficacy and safety of intravenous bolus lacosamide for status epilepticus, including convulsive status epilepticus and non-convulsive epilepticus.

Read the detailed description

In this study, 100 patients with status epilepticus are to be treated. Patients and/or family members signed an informed consent form, and after screening, the participants are enrolled in the group and treated with intravenous lacosamide. The investigators are going to to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide in status epilepticus, and to observe the tolerability and adverse effects of lacosamide by observing the seizures and electroencephalogram changes of lacosamide after treatment with lacosamide. All treatments are performed in strict accordance with Good Clinical Practice for Drugs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy
  • Status Epilepticus

Keywords

  • Lacosamide
  • Intravenous Injection
  • Emergency Termination
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 422 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 112 across 540 observational studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with status epilepticus who are admitted to our hospital and other 4 collaboration hospitals

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 4-60 years old, gender is not limited;
  2. Status epilepticus meets the 2015 diagnostic criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy, i.e., a state of persistent seizures that may cause long-term impairment and manifests itself as:

(1) Tonic-clonic seizures or convulsive seizures, lasting > 5min; (2) Between 2 or more seizures, consciousness is not restored; (3) Focal seizures with impaired consciousness, lasting >10min; (4) absence seizures, lasting >15min; 3. of the patient and signed a written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable vital signs;
  2. showing atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, second-degree, third-degree atrioventricular block;
  3. History of allergy to the drugs used this time;
  4. Participants have a known history of past or present illness of non-epileptic seizures, and current seizures cannot be judged as status epilepticus based on symptomatology and/or electroencephalogram;
  5. Other patients who are considered by the investigator to be unsuitable to participate in the study;
  6. Incomplete clinical data or follow-up information
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with status epilepticus meets the 2015 diagnostic criteria of the ILAE

    Patients with status epilepticus meets the 2015 diagnostic criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy, which is a state in which seizures are persistent and likely to cause long-term impairment, and manifests as: 1. Tonic-clonic seizures or convulsive seizures, lasting \> 5min; 2. Between 2 or more seizures, consciousness is not restored; 3. Focal seizures with impaired consciousness, lasting \>10min; 4. absence seizures, lasting \> 15min;

    Drug: Lacosamide (LCM)

Interventions

  • Intravenous lacosamide is given for the treatment of seizure termination in patients with status epilepticus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Seizure reduction rate

    1. 1-hour status epilepticus termination rate after treatment; 2. seizure-free rate 24 hours after treatment; 3. 3 day seizure-free rate after treatment.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Universty
    GuangZhou, GuanDong 510260, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hsiao MR, Tsai TC, Hsia SH, Chan OW, Lee EP, Lin JJ, Lin KL. Intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children. Epilepsia Open. 2024 Dec;9(6):2241-2250. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13047. Epub 2024 Sep 10. PubMed 39254674 ↗
  • Strzelczyk A, Zollner JP, Willems LM, Jost J, Paule E, Schubert-Bast S, Rosenow F, Bauer S. Lacosamide in status epilepticus: Systematic review of current evidence. Epilepsia. 2017 Jun;58(6):933-950. doi: 10.1111/epi.13716. Epub 2017 Mar 11. PubMed 28295226 ↗
  • Rogawski MA, Tofighy A, White HS, Matagne A, Wolff C. Current understanding of the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide. Epilepsy Res. 2015 Feb;110:189-205. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 3. PubMed 25616473 ↗
  • Doty P, Rudd GD, Stoehr T, Thomas D. Lacosamide. Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jan;4(1):145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2006.10.002. PubMed 17199030 ↗
  • Gainza-Lein M, Sanchez Fernandez I, Jackson M, Abend NS, Arya R, Brenton JN, Carpenter JL, Chapman KE, Gaillard WD, Glauser TA, Goldstein JL, Goodkin HP, Kapur K, Mikati MA, Peariso K, Tasker RC, Tchapyjnikov D, Topjian AA, Wainwright MS, Wilfong A, Williams K, Loddenkemper T; Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group. Association of Time to Treatment With Short-term Outcomes for Pediatric Patients With Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):410-418. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4382. PubMed 29356811 ↗
  • Coppler PJ, Elmer J. Status Epilepticus: A Neurologic Emergency. Crit Care Clin. 2023 Jan;39(1):87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Oct 7. PubMed 36333039 ↗
  • Chin RF, Neville BG, Peckham C, Bedford H, Wade A, Scott RC; NLSTEPSS Collaborative Group. Incidence, cause, and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study. Lancet. 2006 Jul 15;368(9531):222-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69043-0. PubMed 16844492 ↗
  • Rossetti AO, Alvarez V. Update on the management of status epilepticus. Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):172-181. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000899. PubMed 33664203 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — the efficacy of intravenous lacosamide in the treatment of seizure termination and electroencephalogram improvement in patients with status epilepticus

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2025; primary completion for Apr 2027, 22 months later.

Of 193 non-industry observational studies under Epilepsy, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 179. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 230 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 119.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 4, 2025
First posted
May 13, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 6, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2027
Last update
May 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06966830
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Collaborators
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, China, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 6, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Na He, Ph.d
Contact
henachilli@163.com
+86-20-34152285
Bin Li, Ph.D
Contact
lcmlibin@163.com
+86-20-34152285
Na He, Ph.D
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion