ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05882708Updated Apr 24, 2026

Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Hemodynamic in Patients With Sepsis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ivabradine in Sepsis, Ivabradine and Hemodynamics, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
172
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sepsis, a life-threatening syndrome, is often accompanied by tachycardia in spite of adequate volume resuscitation to correct hypovolemia and vasopressor medication to correct hypotension. Recently, relevant studies have shown that sustained tachycardia in sepsis was also related to high mortality, and appropriate control of heart rate could improve prognosis. Ivabradine reduces heart rate directly without a negative inotropic effect through inhibition of the If ionic current,which is absent from the traditional rate control drug (beta-blockers). This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study designed to compare ivabradine with placebo on the difference of heart rate and haemodynamics in patients with sepsis.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to enroll 172 patients with sepsis as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria and sinus tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 bpm) despite a hemodynamic optimization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard treatment group (GS) or ivabradine group (GI,standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine). Patients in GI, with a heart rate control target of 70 to 94bpm, received ivabradine within the first 96 hours after randomization, and overall participants are followed up to 28 days. The secondary outcomes include the difference in SOFA score, incidence of serious adverse events, need for organ support, length of ICU stay, and 28-day overall mortality.

Despite recent studies are limited, this study will investigate whether HR control using ivabradine is safe, feasible, and effective, and further enhance the understanding of ivabradine in patients with sepsis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Ivabradine
  • Hemodynamics
  • Heart Rate Control

Browse trials for

03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 172 is above the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients aged 18 years or above.
  2. Being treated in an intensive care unit.
  3. Sepsis is diagnosed according to Sepsis-3.0 criteria, which is defined as patients requiring antimicrobial agents due to confirmed or suspected infection, acute increase in the SOFA score at least 2 points.
  4. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is maintained ≥65 mmHg with adequate volume resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. Volume resuscitation is considered adequate when Central Venous Pressure (CVP) > 8mmHg, global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) > 680ml/m2 and resting inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter > 1.5cm.
  5. Patients are in a relatively stable period of hemodynamics, as defined that the targe mean arterial pressure are maintained with the same dosage of vasopressors for at least 2 h.
  6. Sinus rhythm with heart rate ≥ 95bpm maintain for at least 2 hours but less than 72 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who had received ivabradine therapy or known allergy to it prior to randomization.
  2. Patients with severe liver dysfunction (Child-C grade).
  3. Patients with a history of pre-existing chronic renal failure ( less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2), except patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
  4. Patients with known seizure disorder.
  5. Patients with any to gastrointestinal drug administration.
  6. Pregnant or lactating patients.
  7. patients requiring the use of potent cytochrome inhibitors such as antifungals of the azole-type (specifically ketoconazole and itraconazole), macrolide antibiotics (specifically clarithromycin and erythromycin) and protease inhibitors (specifically nelfinavir and ritonavir).
  8. Patients with active bleeding;
  9. Patients with cardiac dysfunction caused by non-septic causes such as recent (\< 2months) acute myocardial infarction, chronic cardiac dysfunction ( Class Ⅳ), congenital heart disease, pericardial tamponade, severe aortic regurgitation and aortic coarctation before enrollment.
  10. Patients with sinoatrial block, sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block or heart rate dependence on pacemaker.
  11. Patients with shock, which may be considered if one of the following conditions still exists in spite of active volume resuscitation, high doses of vasoactive drugs (VIS score >120), and other regular therapy: 1) Worsening hypotension (MAP\<65mmHg); 2) Lactate persistence>5mmol/L (two times in a row with an interval of more than 30min), and a progressive upward trend; 3) Mixed venous blood oxygen saturation (SvO2) sustained \<55% (more than two consecutive times, more than 30min apart), and progressive deterioration. The above conditions lasted for more than 5 hours.
  12. Use of beta blockers within 24 hours before enrollment.
  13. Pheochromocytoma patients.
  14. After cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
  15. Patients who have been enrolled in another interventional clinical study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
172 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    standard treatment group

    Standard treatment refers to that patients received active anti-infection and treatment of primary diseases according to the 2016 International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and septic shock. In addition, adequate volume resuscitation and vasoactive drug support can be given to maintain MAP≥65mmHg, and life support technologies such as ventilators and CRRT were given as needed. The target of heart rate control not mentioned in the above guidelines, was not mandatory for this group of patients with sinus tachycardia, so pharmacologic intervention was not administered.

  • Experimental
    Ivabradine group

    Standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine.

    Drug: Ivabradine

Interventions

  • After randomization, the starting dose of ivabradine, 5mg, is given via the gastrointestinal tract every 12 hours. Heart rate control ranged from 70 to 94 bpm. Ivabradine was maintained until 96 hours after initiation of therapy. Beyond this period, the decision to continue ivabradine is left to the discretion of the treating intensivist. During the drug intervention period, heart rate is assessed before each dose. Ivabradine is tapered or discontinued if the heart rate is lower than the target rate; If the heart rate remains ≥95 bpm after 48 hours, the dose is increased to 7.5mg. If a heart rate of 95 or more bpm recurs after discontinuation during the intervention period, treatment with ivabradine can be resumed. Furthermore, Ivabradine is also discontinued at any time in the presence of severe liver impairment, malignant arrhythmia, cardiac conduction block, allergy, the need to take drugs with potentially harmful effects of ivabradine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference of a reduction in heart rate

    Heart rate is a continuous variable with repeated measurements during the first 96 hours after enrollment, the area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  2. The difference in MAP

    MAP will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  3. The difference in CI

    Cardiac index (CI) will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  4. The difference in LVEF

    Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),measured by bedside ultrasound, will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  5. The difference in SVI

    Stroke volume index (SVI), obtained through PiCCO, will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  6. The difference in VIS

    Vasopressor requirement during the trial observation (or intervention) period ought to be recorded as vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) according to the formula. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.

    Time frame: 96 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day overall mortality

    Overall survival measured from randomization to death or day 28

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score

    Difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (0\~24) at day 1, 2, 3, 4 between groups. Higher score means more illness. SOFA score include organ function measure, which can reflect the functional status of organs.

    Time frame: 96 hours

  3. length of ICU stay

    average length of ICU stay will be compared

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. The percentage of need for organ support

    the percentage of receipt of CRRT, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. It can reflect the functional status of organs, especially renal and pulmonary.

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. length of in-hospital stay

    average length of in-hospital stay will be compared

    Time frame: 28 days

  6. Incidence of adverse events

    The incidence of adverse events will be compared between the two groups

    Time frame: 96 hours

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zheng J, Wen D, Pan Z, Chen X, Kong T, Wen Q, Zhou H, Chen W, Zhang Z. Effect of heart rate control with ivabradine on hemodynamic in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08560-5. PubMed 39443954 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 42 months after the start.

Of 65 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Sepsis, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 66 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 11, 2023
First posted
May 31, 2023
StartActual
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2027
Last update
Apr 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05882708
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Collaborators
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Study contacts

Zhenhui Zhang, PhD
Contact
zhzhhicu@126.com
+86 020 34153246
Weiyan Chen, PhD
Contact
sam11124@163.com
+86 020 34153246
Zhenhui Zhang, PhD
study director · The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ivabradine

Start the discussion