ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06953206RESOUND-EUUpdated Jul 30, 2026

Prospective, Long-term Evaluation of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve

An observational study in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR), Aortic-Stenosis and Aortic Insufficiency, sponsored by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 17 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Aortic Valve Stenosis · Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin.

Planned enrollment
6th of 17
500 · median 300
Started
2025
with 1 other
Observational
17 of 17
1 open now
Registered
17th of 17
by date

Among the 17 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin, this one is the 6th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2025, is one of 17 observational ones, and was the 17th registered.

By phase

17 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observationalthis study17 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2013; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2025.

Size and results

Median enrollment 300 across the 17 observational studies. Of the 15 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Evaluation of clinical outcomes and valve performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia (S3UR) valve over 10 years.

Read the detailed description

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has become the gold standard treatment for moderate-to-high risk elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Based on the results of randomized trials including low risk patients, this treatment has been progressively applied to younger (in the sixties and seventies) patients with a low co-morbidity burden. Life expectancy in this group is expected to extend beyond 5 years from intervention in the vast majority of patients, and beyond 10 years in a high proportion. Thus, the issue of valve durability has become one of the most important aspects in the TAVI field in recent years. To date, the rates of bioprosthetic valve failure at 8-10 years after TAVI have been consistently \<10%, but some studies have shown some degree of valve structural degeneration in close to one third of the patients at 8-year follow-up. This subclinical valve degeneration before the 10-year follow-up landmark would represent the initial step in the process of bioprosthetic valve failure, and further valve degeneration leading to clinical symptoms is likely to occur in a significant proportion of these cases.

This prospective registry will evaluate the clinical outcomes and the valve performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve over 10 years.

03

Conditions studied

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
  • Aortic-Stenosis
  • Aortic Insufficiency
  • Degenerative Valve Disease

Keywords

  • TAVR
  • SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve
  • S3UR
  • TAVI
  • Aortic Stenosis
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patiets with severe aortic stenosis planned to undergo TAVR on their native valve with a SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years)
  • Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI on their native valve with S3UR valve
  • Patient is willing to attend the follow-up visits up to 10 years at the center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Lack of written
  • Emergency procedure
  • Pregnancy at time of TAVI

Critieria for long-term observation (1y-10y):

  • Technical success at exit from procedure room (VARC-3):

    • Freedom from mortality
    • Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
    • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device (excluding permanent pacemaker or PTA and stenting without major bleeding) or to a major vascular or access related, or cardiac structural complication
  • Absence of the following severe procedural and in-hospital complications (VARC-3 definitions):

    • All stroke
    • Bleeding type 3-4
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Need for a second valve
    • Valve embolization
    • Coronary obstruction
    • Annular rupture
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • TAVI Patients

    Adult patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI on their native valve with S3UR valve

    Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve (S3UR) replacement (TAVR)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTranscatheter aortic valve (S3UR) replacement (TAVR)

    Elective transfemoral TAVi procedure with S3UR valve.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Early Safety

    Early safety acc. to VARC-3

    Time frame: 1-3 months

  2. Device Success

    Device Success acc. to VARC-3

    Time frame: 1-3 months

  3. Bioprosthetic Valve Failure

    Bioprosthetic valve failure (defined as valve-related mortality OR aortic valve re-operations/re-intervention OR stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration (VARC-3))

    Time frame: 3-5 years

  4. Bioprosthetic Valve Failure

    Bioprosthetic valve failure (defined as valve-related mortality OR aortic valve re-operation/re-intervention OR stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration (VARC-3))

    Time frame: 9-10 years

  5. Structural Valve Deterioration

    Structural Valve Deterioration ≥ stage 2 (VARC-3)

    Time frame: 9-10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic Valve Performance

    * Prosthetic valve regurgitation including paravalvular regurgitation * Mean transvalvular gradient * Max transvalvular gradient * Effective orifice area

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)

  2. Bioprosthetic Valve Failure

    Bioprosthetic Valve Failure acc. to VARC-3

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year 9-10 year)

  3. Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction

    BVD acc. to VARC-3

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)

  4. Patient reported outcomes

    Patient reported outcomes using TASQ questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire

    Time frame: 1-3month, 1+3year Follow Up compared to BL

  5. Cumulated incidence rate BVD or BVF

    Cumulated incidence rate (per 100 patient-years) of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (stage 2 or 3) OR bioprosthetic valve failure up to 10-year follow-up

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  6. Clinical Events

    Clinical events (mortality, stroke, bleeding type 2-4, cardiac rehospitalization, heart failure rehospitalization)

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)

  7. Hemodynamic valve deterioration stage 2 and 3 (VARC-3)

    HVD stage 2 and 3 according to VARC-3 Criteria (moderate and severe HVD).

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)

Other outcomes

  1. Overall kidney function

    Kidney function assessed through lab values: eGFR in ml/min/1,73m2; creatinine in mg/dl or micromol/l; albumin-to-creatinin-ratio in mg/g; serum calcium in mg/dl or millimol/l ; serum phosphate in mg/dl or millimol/l ; PTH intact in pmol/l, pg/ml or ng/l; Hb in g/l, g/dl, millimol/l

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)

  2. Overall Lipid Status

    Lipid status assessed through lab values: total cholesterol in mg/dl, millimol/l or micromol/l; LDL in millimol/l or micromol/l; HDL millimol/l or micromol/l;Triglycerides in mg/dl, millimol/l or micromol/l; latest HbA1c in %; Lp(a) in mg/dl or nmol/l

    Time frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — no individual participant data (IPD) will be shard

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2037, 140 months after the start.

Of 205 non-industry observational studies under Aortic Valve Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 120. This study's planned 140 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 242 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 86.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 16, 2025
First posted
May 1, 2025
StartActual
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2037
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2037
Last update
Jul 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06953206
Lead sponsor
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2025
Start date
Sep 15, 2025
Primary completion
May 30, 2037 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2037 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Claudia Lüske, PhD
Contact
claudia.lueske@ippmed.de
044718503324
Beate Botta, PhD
Contact
beate.botta@ippmed.de
044718503325
Tanja Rudolph, Prof.
principal investigator · Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum
Michael Joner, Prof
principal investigator · German Heart Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion