ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04053088IMPACTUpdated Jul 30, 2026

SAVR: IMPACT of Pre-existing Comorbidities on Patient Outcomes and Prosthetic Valve Performance in a Real-world Setting.

An observational study in Cardiovascular Diseases, sponsored by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin. Active, not recruiting at 22 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The IMPACT Registry represents a non-interventional, prospective, open-label, multicenter, international registry with a follow-up of 5 years that includes data of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™. The IMPACT Registry will be performed in up to 25 participating sites across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. A minimum number of 500 patients (20 patients per center) will be enrolled. Patients will undergo follow-up visits at baseline, surgery, pre-discharge, year 1, year 3 and year 5.

Read the detailed description

The INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ is a stented tri-leaflet valve comprised of bovine pericardial tissue. The tissue is created by treating bovine pericardial tissue with Edwards Integrity Preservation. It incorporates a stable capping anticalcification process, which blocks residual aldehyde groups known to bind with calcium. Tissue preservation with glycerol allows the valve to be stored without a traditional liquid-based solution, such as glutaraldehyde. Therefore, valve is stored under dry packaging conditions and consequently does not require rinsing prior to implantation.

The novel tissue preservation technology significantly improves hemodynamic and anticalcification properties compared with the standard Perimount valve in an ovine model (Flameng et al., 2015). The RESILIA tissue has been studied in the COMMENCE trial: Two year data show that the NYHA class improved in 65.7% of patients, effective orifice area after implantation was 1.6 ± 0.5 cm2; mean gradient was 10.1 ± 4.3 mmHg; and paravalvular leak was none/trivial in 94.5% of patients (mild to moderate in 0.5%) (Puskas et al., 2017).

On the sizes 19 - 25 mm the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ has been outfitted with the VFit technology, which incorporates two novel features designed for potential future valve-in-valve procedures: fluoroscopically visible size markers and an expandable cobalt chromium alloy band. No clinical data are available that evaluate the use of the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ in patients to date.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR)
  • INSPIRIS RESILIA
  • Durability
  • Hemodynamics
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,368 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 939 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is close to the median of 506 across 1,572 observational studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Minimum of 500 patients (20 patients per center) undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) using the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve™ (all comers).

The required sample size was calculated using the online calculator at http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. It was estimated, from the COMMENCE Trial dataset (Puskas et al., 2017) that all-cause mortality is around 1.2% at year 1 and 2.0% at year 2.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient is at least 18 years old
  2. Patient has an aortic valve vitium and requires an aortic valve replacement with the Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™
  3. Patient is scheduled to attend yearly follow-up visits at the registry center up to 5 years
  4. Patient provides written prior to the procedure and in case of emergency after the procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Disability and / or other circumstances under which the patient is not capable to understand the nature, significance and scope of the clinical trial
  2. Active endocarditis/myocarditis or endocarditis/myocarditis within 3 months prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
  3. Patient has a ≤ 12 months for any reason
  4. Valve implantation is not possible in accordance with the device IFU
  5. Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • SAVR patients

    patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) by usage of the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic valve™

    Device: INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™

Interventions

  • DeviceINSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™

    Collection of patient data from patients undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) by usage of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve™

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality after 1 year will be investigated

    Time frame: after 1 year

  2. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality after 3 years will be investigated

    Time frame: after 3 years

  3. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality after 5 years will be investigated

    Time frame: after 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation

    Time frame: after 1 year

  2. Mortality

    All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation

    Time frame: after 3 years

  3. Mortality

    All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation

    Time frame: after 5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time

    Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  2. Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time

    Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  3. Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time

    Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  4. Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time

    Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  5. Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time

    Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  6. Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time

    Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  7. Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time

    Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  8. Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time

    Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  9. Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time

    Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  10. Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time

    Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  11. Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time

    Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  12. Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time

    Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  13. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time

    Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  14. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time

    Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  15. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time

    Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  16. Occurence of paravalvular leaks

    Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch

    Time frame: after 1 year

  17. Occurence of paravalvular leaks

    Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch

    Time frame: after 3 years

  18. Occurence of paravalvular leaks

    Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch

    Time frame: after 5 years

  19. Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time

    SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018

    Time frame: after 1 year

  20. Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time

    SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018

    Time frame: after 3 years

  21. Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time

    SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018

    Time frame: after 5 years

  22. Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation)

    Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 1 year

  23. Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation)

    Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 3 years

  24. Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation)

    Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 5 years

  25. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline

    NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits

    Time frame: after 1 year

  26. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline

    NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits

    Time frame: after 3 years

  27. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline

    NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits

    Time frame: after 5 years

  28. Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization

    any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 1 year

  29. Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization

    any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 3 years

  30. Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization

    any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 5 years

  31. Need for new pacemaker implant

    Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at baseline) will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 1 year

  32. Need for new pacemaker implant

    Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at the preceding follow-up visit) will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 3 years

  33. Need for new pacemaker implant

    Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at the preceding follow-up visit) will be documented and assessed

    Time frame: after 5 years

07

Study locations

22 sites
  • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Uniklinik für Herzchirurgie
    Innsbruck, Austria
  • Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz
    Linz, 4021, Austria
  • • Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, Herzchirurgie, Gefäßchirurgie und endovaskuläre Chirurgie
    Salzburg, Austria
  • • Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Herz-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie
    Wels, Austria
  • Klinikum Nürnberg
    Nuremberg, Bavaria 90471, Germany
  • Klinikum Passau/Universität Regensburg
    Passau, Bavaria 94032, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
    Würzburg, Bavaria 97080, Germany
  • • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Thorax-, Herz- und thorakale Gefässchirurgie
    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 60590, Germany
  • Universitätsklinik für Herzchirurgie
    Oldenburg, Lower Saxony 26133, Germany
  • Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
    Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia 52074, Germany
  • Schüchtermann Klinik
    Bad Rothenfelde, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Herzzentrum Bergmannsheil
    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia 44789, Germany
  • Klinik für Herzchirurgie UKD
    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia 40225, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia 45147, Germany
  • • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie
    Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
  • BundeswehrKrankenhaus Klinik XVII und XVIII
    Koblenz, 56072, Germany
  • Helios Klinikum Siegburg
    Siegburg, 53721, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
    Ulm, 89091, Germany
  • Helios Klinikum Wuppertal
    Wuppertal, 42283, Germany
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis, Catharina Hart- en Vaatcentrum
    Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • HerzKlinik Hirslanden, Herz- und thorakale Gefässchirurgie
    Zurich, Switzerland
  • HerzZentrum Hirslanden, Herz- und Gefässchirurgie
    Zurich, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salaun E, Clavel MA, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Bioprosthetic aortic valve durability in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2018 Aug;104(16):1323-1332. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311582. Epub 2018 May 7. PubMed 29735584 ↗
  • Bakhtiary F, Benedikt P, Bonaros N, Borger M, Doss M, Feyrer R, Grunenfelder J, Owais T, Karimli S, Lam KY, Liebold A, Martens A, Massoudy P, Batashev I, Poling J, Scherner MP, Strauch J, Thielmann M, Votsch A, Walther T, Weber A, Wiesinger S, Eden M, Kammler J, Botta B, Trushina N, Vijayan A, Bramlage P, Zierer A. Three-Year Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthetic Valve from the Multi-Centre IMPACT Registry. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2026 Mar 12;41(3):ivag056. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivag056. PubMed 41787958 ↗
  • Bakhtiary F, Ahmad AE, Autschbach R, Benedikt P, Bonaros N, Borger M, Dewald O, Feyrer R, Geissler HJ, Grunenfelder J, Lam KY, Leyh R, Liebold A, Czesla M, Mehdiani A, Pollari F, Salamate S, Strauch J, Votsch A, Weber A, Wendt D, Botta B, Bramlage P, Zierer A. Impact of pre-existing comorbidities on outcomes of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement - rationale and design of the international IMPACT registry. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01434-w. PubMed 33766089 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 81 months after the start.

Of 580 non-industry observational studies under Cardiovascular Diseases, half reached primary completion within 70 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 196. This study's planned 81 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 664 studies reached it within 61 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 192.

Cardiovascular Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 6, 2019
First posted
Aug 12, 2019
StartActual
Dec 12, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04053088
Lead sponsor
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 12, 2019
Start date
Dec 12, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Farhad Bakhtiary, Dr. med.
principal investigator · Helios Klinik Siegburg
Andreas Zierer, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Kepler University Hosiptal Linz and Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion