ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06951542Updated Jun 10, 2026

HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction and Outcomes in Malawi

An interventional study of Stigma Reduction Counseling in Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, HIV and Health Condition Stigma, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Enrolling by invitation at 2 sites in Malawi. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall aim of this study is to assess the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and effectiveness of a depression treatment intervention augmented with counseling to address stigma. Using a multiple-baseline design, 200 depressed adults living with HIV will be enrolled in the trial. Participant surveys and abstracted clinical data related to HIV and depression care will assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Stigma and depression are associated with increased HIV-related mortality and morbidity; as depression treatment is increasingly integrated into HIV care, addressing HIV stigma, mental illness stigma, and intersectional HIV-mental illness stigma is crucial. The Malawi Ministry of Health has recently integrated depression screening and treatment into the antiretroviral therapy (ART) departments of 12 District Hospitals across the country, including Salima and Mulanje District Hospital. Through this program, adults living with HIV are now screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and depressed patients are prescribed antidepressants using Measurement-based Care (MBC) or referred for Friendship Bench (FB) problem-solving therapy.

With this study the investigators aim to augment the existing depression treatment program at Salima and Mulanje District Hospitals with counselling to help address and reduce stigma. The stigma reduction counseling sessions will include psychoeducation and activities to challenge myths and stereotypes, cope with experiences of discrimination, and overcome self-stigma. Ultimately, this study will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and preliminary effectiveness of the HIV-mental illness stigma-reduction intervention as part of depression treatment integrated into HIV care at Salima and Mulanje district hospitals using a pilot trial, with a multiple-baseline design. To achieve this goal, the investigators will enroll 200 depressed adults living with HIV in the trial, survey patient participants at enrollment, 3-months and 6-months, abstract clinical data related to HIV and depression care, track engagement in the stigma reduction intervention, assess intervention sessions for fidelity to the intervention protocol and conduct qualitative interviews with a sub-set of patients who received the stigma-reduction intervention (n=20) and healthcare providers including HTC counselors (N=4), ART providers (N=10), Friendship Bench counselors (N=6), and counselors (n=4) who deliver the stigma-reduction intervention.

This innovative research will a) address HIV, MI and intersectional stigma while leveraging existing mental health services for people living with HIV, b) lay the ground-work for a multi-level stigma-reduction intervention package, and c) yield detailed insights into barriers and facilitators of implementing stigma-reduction interventions in low-resource settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
  • HIV
  • Health Condition Stigma

Keywords

  • Malawi
  • Health Condition Stigma
  • Stigma
  • Measurement-based Care (MBC)
  • Friendship Bench (FB) Therapy
  • Salima
  • Mulanje
  • Mental Illness Stigma
  • HIV Stigma
  • Stigma Reduction Counseling
  • Stigma Intervention
  • Multi-Level Stigma Reduction
  • HIV Care Engagement
  • HIV
  • Depression
03

In context

Social Stigma

266 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Stigma; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 139 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Social Stigma.

Browse Social Stigma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,668 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 109 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Living with and receiving ART at Salima or Mulanje District Hospital
  • Adult (18+ years)
  • Elevated depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 Score ≥5)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Severe mental or physical illness
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Pre-Implementation Phase

    In the pre-implementation phase, antiretroviral therapy (ART) providers will screen and treat patients at ART for depression as is now standard practice. Namely, patients will be screened using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and depressed patients will be treated with Measurement-based Care (MBC) and/or Friendship Bench (FB) problem-solving therapy. At each monthly ART appointment, providers assess patients' depressive symptoms and continue depression treatment as clinically indicated.

  • Experimental
    Intervention Implementation Phase

    In the intervention implementation phase, patients at antiretroviral therapy (ART) will be screened and treated for depression as described and assessed for the study enrollment as in the pre-implementation phase. Depressed patients will be referred to counselors to receive the stigma-reduction intervention sessions. Stigma-reduction counseling sessions will include psychoeducation and activities to challenge myths and stereotypes, cope with experiences of discrimination, and overcome self-stigma. Intervention sessions will be audio-recorded (with participants' consent) as part of the fidelity assessment.

    Behavioral: Stigma Reduction Counseling

Interventions

  • BehavioralStigma Reduction Counseling

    The stigma reduction counseling sessions will include psychoeducation and activities to challenge myths and stereotypes, cope with experiences of discrimination, and overcome self-stigma.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will measure feasibility by conducting qualitative interviews (guided by Proctor's Outcomes for Implementation Research) with providers and counselors who deliver the stigma-reduction intervention. This interview will consist of 12 open-ended questions (with subparts) meant to elicit a response from providers about their perceived changes in their patients' attitudes/well-being, their personal comfort level with delivering the intervention and competency, their training satisfaction, their recommendations for improving the intervention, and their perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of the intervention.

    Time frame: Upon the completion of intervention delivery for all patients (assessed up to 6 months)

  2. Patient Acceptability of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will conduct audio-recorded semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients enrolled in the study who initiated depression treatment during the implementation phase. The investigators will use interview guides (using guidance from Proctor's Outcomes for Implementation Research) to conduct qualitative interviews with patients. The interviews will consist of 11 open-ended questions (with subparts) which are designed to elicit a response from the patient about their perceived acceptability of the intervention. This includes how helpful patients believed the intervention was in improving their mental health and feelings of stigma, barriers and facilitators to engagement in the intervention, and perceived areas of improvement and harm of the intervention.

    Time frame: After completion of all intervention sessions, an average of 6 months

  3. Patient Acceptability of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will measure acceptability of the intervention through a quantitative questionnaire, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. Each of the 8 questions are scored from 1-4 with higher ratings indicating greater satisfaction with the intervention.

    Time frame: After completion of each intervention session

  4. Provider Acceptability of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will use interview guides (using guidance from Proctor's Outcomes for Implementation Research) to conduct qualitative interviews with counselors and providers who deliver the stigma-reduction intervention to assess acceptability to providers. This interview will consist of 12 open-ended questions meant to elicit a response from providers about their perceived changes in their patients' attitudes/well-being, their personal comfort level with delivering the intervention and competency, their training satisfaction, their recommendations for improving the intervention, and their perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of the intervention.

    Time frame: Upon intervention delivery completion for all patients (assessed up to 6 months)

  5. Fidelity of the Content of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will monitor fidelity in the content of the intervention protocol by assessing the extent to which providers correctly deliver depression treatment and stigma-reduction intervention by reviewing audio-recorded intervention sessions with patients using a fidelity checklist.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  6. Fidelity of the Coverage of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will monitor fidelity in the coverage of the intervention protocol using clinical and program data to measure the percentage of patients who receive the correct depression treatment and the stigma-reduction intervention.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  7. Fidelity of the Frequency of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will monitor fidelity in the frequency of the intervention protocol using clinical and program data to measure the number of completed depression treatment appointments and stigma-reduction intervention sessions, as well as the number of patients who complete the depression treatment and stigma-reduction intervention.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  8. Fidelity of the Duration of the HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention

    The investigators will monitor fidelity in the duration of the intervention protocol using clinical and program data to measure the number of depression treatment and stigma-reduction intervention sessions patients receive over their first six months in HIV care and the attendance of at least 75% of scheduled depression treatment appointments and stigma-reduction intervention sessions (y/n) over the first six months in HIV care.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  9. Preliminary Effectiveness of The HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention to Reduce Stigma

    Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale will be used to assess patient's level of internalized HIV stigma. Patients rate their agreement of 6 statements. Items are scored with a 0 for disagree or 1 for agree. A higher total scores indicate greater internalized stigma.

    Time frame: At enrollment, 3-months post enrollment, and 6-months post enrollment

  10. Preliminary Effectiveness of The HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention to Reduce Stigma

    The Adapted Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale will be used to assess patient's level of internalized HIV stigma. The Adapted Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale measures patient's internalized stigma with regard to their mental health. Patients rate their agreement with 29 statements across five subscales: alienation, stereotype endorsement, perceived discrimination, social withdrawal, and stigma resistance. The scale for scoring items indicates a 0 for "strongly disagree" to a 4 for "strongly agree". A higher total scores indicate greater internalized stigma.

    Time frame: At enrollment, 3-months post enrollment, and 6-months post enrollment

  11. Preliminary Effectiveness of The HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention to Address Depression

    The investigators will utilize the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), completed by providers, to measure patients' severity of depression. Patients will indicate how often they experienced 9 depression symptoms in the last 2 weeks. The scale for scoring items indicates a 0 for "not at all" and a 3 for "nearly every day". Higher total scores indicate greater depression severity. Scores of 5 or more are indicative of mild to severe depression.

    Time frame: At enrollment, 3-months post enrollment, and 6-months post enrollment

  12. Preliminary Effectiveness of The HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention to Improve HIV Care Engagement

    Clinical data related to antiretroviral therapy appointment attendance will be abstracted.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  13. Preliminary Effectiveness of The HIV-Mental Illness Stigma Reduction Intervention to Improve HIV Care Engagement

    Clinical data related to antiretroviral therapy pill counts will be abstracted.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 14 months after the start.

Of 162 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Social Stigma, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32. This study's planned 14 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 164 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2025
First posted
Apr 30, 2025
StartActual
May 4, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Jun 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06951542
Responsible party
Melissa Stockton (Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2025
Start date
May 4, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion