ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06945835Updated Nov 3, 2025

High Intensity Exercise and Improving Physical Activity Among People With Neurologic Dysfunction

An interventional study of Participate in high intensity exercise of at least 20 minutes in 60 minutes session of RPE greater than 6. in Cerebral Palsy (CP), Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by University of Hartford. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-03.

Sponsored by University of Hartford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Hawks in Motion (HIM) High Intensity Exercise program is designed to implement the American Physical Therapy Clinical Practice Guidelines and American College of Sports Medicine recommendations for exercise for people with neurologic disability. Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students administer the HIM High Intensity Exercise Program. A prior study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the HIM High Intensity Exercise Program and found it feasible, safe, and effective for 30 people with neurologic disabilities between the ages of 8-99 years. The investigators would like to evaluate whether participation in the HIM High Intensity Exercise Program affects mobility in everyday life. Physical activity will be measured one week before program implementation and one week after to assess if the participants' mobility in everyday improved.

Read the detailed description

The neurological conditions of spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke (CVA), traumatic brain injury (TBI), cerebral palsy (CP), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), and Parkinson's disease (PD) create a variety of physical impairments that make movement difficult. For example, people with SCI can have complete or partial paralysis of the arms, legs, and or trunk depending on the location and severity of injury. People with CMT have paralysis in specific muscles of the hands, feet, and trunk. Similarly, people with TBI, CVA, and CP can experience increased muscle tone, decreased voluntary movement, and difficulty moving at correct speeds. This makes walking, moving surface to surface, and doing other physical activities difficult, frustrating, and tiring. People tend not to move, and end up with chronic pain, heart disease, diabetes, and poor health. Physical inactivity is one of the most concerning issues among individuals with chronic neurological conditions, often resulting in limited community participation and reduced quality of life. Many individuals with these conditions struggle to achieve sufficient physical activity levels necessary for functional independence and movement in the community, essential for maintaining social connections and overall well-being. Despite the known benefits of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, challenges persist in improving mobility in community settings. It has been hypothesized that by increasing function and endurance, which the HIM High Intensity Program can do, mobility in everyday life may improve. The purpose of the project is to see if physical activity among individuals with chronic neurological disabilities can be increased by participation in a community-based exercise program. The investigators would like to answer the following research question: Does participation in an 8-week, twice-a-week high-intensity exercise program for people with neurologic disability run by Doctor of Physical Therapy students increase physical activity in the everyday life?

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy (CP)
  • Stroke
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Charcot Marie Tooth Disease (CMT)
  • Spina Bifida

Keywords

  • high intensity exercise
  • physical activity
  • physical disability
03

In context

Cerebral Palsy

1,936 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 458 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 34 across 1,431 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Palsy.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hartford is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • physical disability that limits mobility and activities of daily living, and a neurodevelopmental disability OR neurological disability,
  • age 8-99 years of age,
  • understands verbal instructions,
  • able to obtain medical clearance,
  • able to obtain transportation to campus,
  • have a parent/guardian/caregiver on site if not own legal authorized representative,
  • English speaking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no presence of a physical disability that impacts activities of daily living, no neurodevelopmental or neurological disability as an underlying cause,
  • no person-centered goals (locomotion, fitness, transfers, and mobility),
  • unstable cardiac condition,
  • uncontrolled seizures,
  • unstable oxygen saturation levels,
  • no clearance from primary care physician for exercise,
  • unable to read and understand English,
  • pursuing active litigation for their physical condition.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    Participants will receive two times a week for 8 weeks one hour of individualized exercise program that is based on clinical practice guidelines for high intensity exercise.

    Behavioral: Participate in high intensity exercise of at least 20 minutes in 60 minutes session of RPE greater than 6.

Interventions

  • BehavioralParticipate in high intensity exercise of at least 20 minutes in 60 minutes session of RPE greater than 6.

    Partticipants will be performing supported and unsupported walking, free weights, rowing, cycling, resistance bands, adaptive bikes and body weight exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Gait Assessment-(FGA)

    The Functional Gait Assessment assesses postural stability during walking and assesses an individual's ability to perform multiple motor tasks while walking, with rating of performance on a scale of 0-30, with higher scores indicating better performance. The tool is reliable and valid and has an established minimally clinical important difference (MCID) for the included diagnoses: stroke, vestibular disorders, older adults and geriatric care, Parkinson's Disease, and other non-specific patient populations. For those who cannot complete this test, they will do the Berg Balance Test.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  2. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure is a semi-structured Interview by which participants rate satisfaction and performance on patient-identified goals a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  3. Berg Balance Scale- (BBS)

    The Berg Balance Scale evaluates one's ability to maintain a position and perform a specific task. The scale for scoring is based on a 5-point scale 0 being unable to complete 4 being able to complete, scores ranging 0-70. Higher scores indicate better performance. There are 14 items on the test including; sitting to standing, standing unsupported, sitting with back unsupported, standing to sitting, transfers, standing unsupported with eyes closed, standing unsupported feet together, reaching forward with outstretched arm while standing, pick up object from floor from standing, turning to look behind over both shoulders, 360 turn, toe touch unsupported, tandem unsupported, and single leg stance. The tool is reliable and valid and has an established MCID for the included diagnoses: stroke, SCI, and Parkinson's patients.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  4. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABS)

    The Activities Balance Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness, with 16 items. Each item is rated from 0% to 100%, with 0 indicating no confidence and 100% indicating complete confidence. All items are averaged for a total balance confidence score of 0-100%. Higher scores overall indicate greater balance confidence.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  5. 10 Meter Walk Test- (10MWT)

    The 10-meter walk test is a clinical assessment used to measure short-duration walking speed in meter per seconds (m/s). It involves measuring the time it takes a participant to walk 10 meters, often with a focus on the middle 6 meters to minimize the effects of acceleration and deceleration. Average gait speed is 1.2 m/s, and can be as low as 0.3 in populations with an assistive device. A faster gait speed, or a score of less time indicates better performance. The test is frequently used to assess gait speed in various populations, including those with conditions like stroke, Parkinson's disease, and dementia.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  6. 5 Times Sit to Stand: (5XSTS)

    The five time sit to stand aids in quantifying functional lower extremity strength and assessing the participant's movement strategies in performing transitional movements. The participant is instructed to sit up and down five times without using their arms as fast as they can after the clinician says "Go", and the timer stops after the patient sits down for the fifth repetition. Time varies by age group, but scores above 12 seconds may indicate fall risk. A faster speed indicates better performance. This outcome measure can be used within a variety of populations, including vestibular disorders, stroke, Parkinson's Disease, Older Adults, Multiple Sclerosis, Cerebral Palsy, and other non-specific patient populations as well. It has excellent validity and reliability, and the MCID has been established.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  7. Timed 30 second repetition arm curl.

    For Individuals who are wheelchair users, and are therefore unable to stand, or who cannot safely perform standing tests a timed arm curl test will be performed. The purpose of this test is to assess upper extremity strength and endurance. The test is conducted using the dominant arm. The participant is seated on a chair with feet flat on the floor, holding a 5-pound weight in a suitcase grip (palm is facing the body) in a vertically down position by the chair (start position). The participant performs an arm curl throughout a full range of motion, gradually turning the palm up and the elbow fully bent. The arm is lowered again to the starting position with the elbow fully straightened. The participant performs as many as possible in 30 seconds. Range of number of arm cults can be from 0-30. The average number varies by age and gender, but a high number repetitions performed in 30 seconds indicates better muscle performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  8. Timed 30 second Wheelchair Push Ups.

    Participants who use a wheelchair as primary means of locomotion will do timed 30 second wheelchair pushups. The participant demonstrates how many wheelchair pushups can be completed in 30 seconds. A push-up is when the bottom is unweighted from the seat. Range of pushup can be from 0-30. A high number repetitions performed in 30 seconds indicates better muscle performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  9. Six minute walk test (6MWT)/6 minute push test)

    The 6MWT/push test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess walking or locomotion endurance and aerobic capacity. Participants will walk/push a set circuit for a total of six minutes. Distance is measured during the 6MWT or push test. Distances walked can range from 0 to 2500 meters. Longer distances indicate increased endurance and aerobic capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity Monitoring

    The Actigraph GTX will be used to measure physical activity across 7 days before and after the activity. It will be worn on the waist for people who ambulate and on the wrist for those who use a wheelchair. We will classify the movement patterns into sedentary and moderate to vigorous activity using the software with the accelerometers, and this will be compared pre- and post-intervention. The investigators evaluate average steps, percentage of time in sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous activity per week. Range of average steps is 0-unlimited and average time spent in sedentary light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous activity per week is 0-100% . A higher number of steps with less time in sedentary activity time indicate greater physical activity.

    Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Hartford
    West Hartford, Connecticut 06117, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — none at this time

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2025 to primary completion in May 2025, 3 months.

Of 902 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 921 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2025
First posted
Apr 25, 2025
StartActual
Feb 24, 2025
Primary completionActual
May 27, 2025
CompletionActual
May 27, 2025
Last update
Nov 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06945835
Lead sponsor
University of Hartford
Responsible party
Mary Gannotti (Professor, University of Hartford) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2025
Start date
Feb 24, 2025
Primary completion
May 27, 2025
Completion
May 27, 2025
Last update
Nov 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion