ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06945094FlashVUpdated Apr 27, 2025

A Multi-center, Real-World Clinical Trial of caIMR on Two Specific Kinds of Patients.

An observational study in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD), Stable Angina Pectoris and Unstable Angina Pectoris, sponsored by Ge Junbo. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.

Sponsored by Ge Junbo · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
508
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) can be used to provide a binary assessment whether patients(with stable angina, unstable angina, suspected myocardial ischemia, or coronary artery stenosis of less than 50%, and without cardiomyopathy or obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease) have microcirculatory dysfunction, using a cutoff value of 25.

This study aims to evaluate the binary classification performance of caIMR in two specific groups of patients: (1) those with caIMR values between 20 and 30, and (2) those with diffuse disease. We will do this by looking at differences in their Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores and their health outcomes over a three-year period.

Read the detailed description

The coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) is a novel, non-invasive, imaging-based functional index for diagnosing coronary microvascular disease, which has been clinically validated for market release. It can be used to provide a binary assessment of whether patients with stable angina, unstable angina, suspected myocardial ischemia, or coronary artery stenosis of less than 50% (without cardiomyopathy or obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease) have microcirculatory dysfunction, using a cutoff value of 25.

This trial is a prospective, multicenter, observational real-world study. We will regularly collect clinical diagnostic data (including angiographic images) patients who undergo caIMR measurement using the Coronary Artery Functional Measurement System and single-use pressure sensors as part of their routine medical care. After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria will be enrolled in this trial.

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the binary classification performance of caIMR by comparing patients' Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores before the procedure and at six months post-procedure in two specific groups of patients: :

  1. Assessing the binary classification performance of caIMR in patients with values between 20 and 30.
  2. Assessing the binary classification performance of caIMR in patients with diffuse disease.

The secondary objective is to validate the prognostic value of caIMR in these two groups of patients based on the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over a three-year period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD)
  • Stable Angina Pectoris
  • Unstable Angina Pectoris
  • Myocardial Ischemia, Angina Pectoris

Keywords

  • Hemodynamics
  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Angiography-derived IMR
  • coronary microvascular dysfunction
  • stable and unstable angina
03

In context

Angina, Stable

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina, Stable; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 508 is close to the median of 508 across 103 observational studies indexed under Angina, Stable.

Browse Angina, Stable studies →

Lead sponsor

Ge Junbo is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will enroll patients with stable angina, unstable angina, suspected myocardial ischemia, or coronary artery stenosis of less than 50%, who do not have cardiomyopathy or obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. Specifically, we will focus on two groups: (1) patients with caIMR values between 20 and 30, and (2) patients with diffuse disease.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between 18 and 80 years, regardless of gender;
  2. Diagnosed with stable angina, unstable angina, or suspected myocardial ischemia;
  3. targeted vessel stenosis \< 50% and caIMR values between 20 and 30; or

(3) Targeted vessel stenosis \< 50%, but with lesion length > 20 mm and caFFR > 0.8, representing diffuse disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previously undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI);
  2. History of heart failure or myocardial infarction;
  3. Acute myocardial infarction;
  4. Primary or secondary cardiomyopathy;
  5. Primary or secondary severe valvular heart disease;
  6. Severe systemic infections;
  7. Malignant cachectic diseases and an estimated survival of less than one year;
  8. Patients who are currently participating in other clinical trials involving drugs or devices and have not yet reached the primary endpoint of those trials;
  9. Patients whom the investigator deems to have other conditions that make them unsuitable for participation in the clinical trial.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
508 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Grey zone patients

    Patients with caIMR values between 20 and 30 can be enrolled in this group, a total of 254 patients of this type will be enrolled in the study.The binary classification performance of caIMR will be validated based on differences in their Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores and their health outcomes.

    Device: caIMR

  • Diffuse disease patients.

    Patients with diffuse coronary disease and less than 50% stenosis can be enrolled in this group, a total of 254 patients of this type will be enrolled in the study. CaIMR will be assessed in these patients, and its binary classification performance will be validated based on differences in their Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores and their health outcomes.

    Device: caIMR

Interventions

  • DevicecaIMR

    caIMR will be measured by pressure sensors which are produced by Suzhou Rainmed Medical Technology Co., Ltd. caIMR is calculated based on angiography images and Hyperemic Pa estimated from resting Pa according to prespecified equation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores

    The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a rigorously validated disease-specific health status assessment tool widely used to evaluate symptoms, functional status, and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Utilizing the SAQ as an endpoint in clinical trials ensures the scientific validity and comparability of study results, providing valuable insights for clinical practice.

    Time frame: Before the procedure and six months post-procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events)

    It is defined as a composite endpoint including cardiovascular death, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization for angina, heart failure, and stroke.

    Time frame: At 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-procedure.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, Rocchiccioli P, McEntegart M, Watkins S, Eteiba H, Shaukat A, Lindsay M, Robertson K, Hood S, McGeoch R, McDade R, Yii E, Sidik N, McCartney P, Corcoran D, Collison D, Rush C, McConnachie A, Touyz RM, Oldroyd KG, Berry C. Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2841-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 25. PubMed 30266608 ↗
  • Chan PS, Jones PG, Arnold SA, Spertus JA. Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):640-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000967. Epub 2014 Sep 2. PubMed 25185249 ↗
  • Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, Berry C, Escaned J, Maas AHEM, Prescott E, Karam N, Appelman Y, Fraccaro C, Louise Buchanan G, Manzo-Silberman S, Al-Lamee R, Regar E, Lansky A, Abbott JD, Badimon L, Duncker DJ, Mehran R, Capodanno D, Baumbach A. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 1;41(37):3504-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa503. PubMed 32626906 ↗
  • Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Among Patients With Chest Pain and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1445-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.06.017. PubMed 26404197 ↗
  • Liu L, Abdu FA, Yin G, Xu B, Mohammed AQ, Xu S, Lv X, Luo Y, Zu L, Yang C, Zhang Z, Zhou Y, Cai H, Lv Z, Xu Y, Che W. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with D-SPECT camera in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):3025-3037. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02252-8. Epub 2020 Sep 30. PubMed 33000403 ↗
  • Radico F, Zimarino M, Fulgenzi F, Ricci F, Di Nicola M, Jespersen L, Chang SM, Humphries KH, Marzilli M, De Caterina R. Determinants of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with angina but without obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 14;39(23):2135-2146. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy185. PubMed 29688324 ↗
  • Zhang D, Lv S, Song X, Yuan F, Xu F, Zhang M, Yan S, Cao X. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2015 Mar;101(6):455-62. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306578. Epub 2015 Jan 30. PubMed 25637372 ↗
  • Huang D, Gong Y, Fan Y, Zheng B, Lu Z, Li J, Huo Y, Escaned J, Huo Y, Ge J. Coronary angiography-derived index for assessing microcirculatory resistance in patients with non-obstructed vessels: The FLASH IMR study. Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Apr 12. PubMed 37054908 ↗
  • Li J, Gong Y, Wang W, Yang Q, Liu B, Lu Y, Xu Y, Huo Y, Yi T, Liu J, Li Y, Xu S, Zhao L, Ali ZA, Huo Y. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR. Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jun 1;116(7):1349-1356. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz289. PubMed 31693092 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06945094
Lead sponsor
Ge Junbo
Collaborators
RainMed Medical Group
Responsible party
Ge Junbo (Coordinating Investigator, Fudan University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2025

Study contacts

Dong Huang, Doctor
Contact
huang.dong@zs-hospital.sh.cn
+8618124009136

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion