ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06930521JUSTIFYUpdated Jun 15, 2026

JUdicious Surveillance for Trastuzumab Induced Cardiotoxicity in the First Year

An interventional study of Intervention - Low Risk Group OR Intermediate Risk Group in Cardiovascular Health, Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3), sponsored by Women's College Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Sponsored by Women's College Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study focuses on male and female patients being treated for breast cancer that is positive for the HER2 receptor which requires special treatments targeting that receptor. The problem is that these treatments, while effective for the cancer, can sometimes harm the heart. Because of this, patients have to undergo heart tests every three months during treatment, even if they have no history of heart disease or feel fine.

The guidelines for these regular heart tests were established decades ago when these treatments were first introduced, but research shows that most of these tests don't actually change the treatment plan. This suggests that many patients are going through unnecessary tests, which can cause stress, delay treatments, and increase healthcare costs.

To address this, the researchers propose a new study with 300 patients with HER2 positive breast cancer to test a more personalized approach to cardiac surveillance. Participants will be classified based on their risk of heart problems: low or intermediate. Instead of testing every patient every three months, those in the intermediate group will be tested every 4 months, and those in the low-risk group will be tested every 6 months. The researchers will compare this new approach to the current system to see if fewer tests are just as safe and effective.

The researchers will measure heart health, how well cancer treatments are completed, and how patients feel about having fewer tests. If this new approach works, it could save money and reduce the burden on female patients without risking their health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Health
  • Breast Cancer
  • Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)
  • Cardio-oncology
  • Circulatory and Respiratory Health
  • Clinical and Translational Cardiovascular Sciences
  • Health Services and Systems - Healthcare Effectiveness &Amp; Outcomes

Keywords

  • Trastuzumab
  • Cardiac imaging
  • Her-2 positive breast cancer
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiotoxicity
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction
  • Heart failure
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Nuclear imaging
  • Non-inferiority
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Women's College Hospital is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Stage 1-3 breast cancer (BC).
  2. Age 18-79 years.
  3. positive BC with planned HER2 targeted therapy (HER2TT) for curative intent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Distant detected clinically, radiographically, or histologically
  2. Baseline echocardiogram images of insufficient quality for a quantitative assessment of (LVEF)
  3. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, defined as:

    1. Prior myocardial infarction (even if LVEF has normalized)
    2. Prior heart failure (HF, including patients with preserved ejection fraction and normalized LVEF)
    3. Baseline LVEF \<55%
    4. Atrial fibrillation
    5. Greater than moderate valvular disease (i.e., severe, or moderate-severe)
  4. Cumulative anthracycline exposure ≥250mg/m2 before starting HER2TT
  5. Functional Class II, III or IV, or score >2*
  6. Symptoms potentially due to serious cardiac disease as per investigator's judgement* *Exclusion criterion adopted as they make clinical assessment less reliable to detect emergent HF.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    The SOC arm will receive imaging before cycles 1, 5, 9, and 13 (in keeping with the FDA product label), then at the end of HER2-TT, i.e., imaging every 3 months for uninterrupted adjuvant HER2TT.

  • Experimental
    Judicious Imaging

    This group will get less echocardiograms based on their risk of developing heart failure. People who do not have any issues that predispose to heart failure are categorized as low risk and will get an echocardiogram once every 6 months. People who have factors that may predispose to heart failure are categorized as intermediate risk and will get an echocardiogram approximately once every 4 months.

    Diagnostic Test: Intervention - Low Risk Group OR Intermediate Risk Group

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testIntervention - Low Risk Group OR Intermediate Risk Group

    Participants will be randomized to judicious imaging (decreased imaging frequency based on HF risk category) or SOC (imaging every 3 months). Participants who do not have any HF risk factors will be categorized as low risk, while participants with at least one risk factor will be categorized as intermediate risk for HF. Low Risk (zero risk factors): imaging before cycles 1 and 9 of HER2-TT (i.e., at baseline and near the halfway mark, corresponding to 2 fewer studies than SOC in Year 1), then after the end of HER2TT. This translates to imaging every 6 months for uninterrupted adjuvant HER2TT. Intermediate Risk (any risk factors): imaging before cycles 1, 6, and 12 of HER2-TT (i.e., at baseline and near the 1/3 and 2/3 marks, corresponding to 1 fewer study than SOC in Year 1), then at end of HER2TT. This translates to imaging every 4 months for uninterrupted adjuvant HER2TT.

This study also gives Trastuzumab. No intervention listed here names it: that was found by reading the record.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinically overt heart failure

    Determined as a binary event Y/N, per standardized definition

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100days after end of treatment

  2. Premature HER2TT discontinuation

    Determined as a binary event Y/N, per clinical records

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100days after end of treatment

  3. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of anxiety/depression, stress, and treatment burden

    Desirable outcome is a better scores in ≥2 of 3 PROMs-Treatment Burden Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100 days after end of treatment

  4. Asymptomatic cardiotoxicity at end of HER2TT

    Per Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee criteria, based on LVEF change

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment

  5. Time to complete HER2TT

    Number weeks from first HER2TT cycle to last (shorter is better)

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment

  6. Total number of cardiac imaging tests during HER2TT

    Number of LVEF assessments (fewer is better)

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in percentage of LVEF

    Based on cardiac imaging. Analyzed for non-inferiority of judicious imaging versus standard of care

    Time frame: From baseline imaging to one year

  2. Desirability Ratio

    Limited to primary outcomes 1-5 (excluding the number of cardiac imaging tests)

    Time frame: From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2029, 38 months after the start.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 38 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 31, 2025
First posted
Apr 16, 2025
StartActual
Apr 22, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 2033
Last update
Jun 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06930521
Lead sponsor
Women's College Hospital
Responsible party
Husam Abdel-Qadir (Cardiologist, Women's College Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2025
Start date
Apr 22, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Husam Abdel-Qadir, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Contact
husam.abdel-qadir@wchospital.ca
416-323-7723

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion