ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06899308CUB-HS2025Updated Sep 25, 2026

Health Surveillance at Constructor University Bremen (CUB)

An observational study in Social Isolation or Loneliness, Anxiety and Anxiety Depression (Mild or Not Persistent), sponsored by Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH · Observational

Updated Sep 25, 2026Interventions changed2 sites added+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
373
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of Health Surveillance is to analyze and describe the state of health of students at Constructor University, key influencing factors and individual resources by using mixed-method design.

Read the detailed description

The aim of Health Surveillance, plus the additional research by means of qualitative interviews is to analyze and describe the state of stress and health of students at Constructor University (CU) by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU (and employees at HAW Hamburg), key influencing factors and individual resources. In areas where there is a need for action, the Health Surveillance plus this project, the additional qualitative interviews can provide detailed insights and/or in-depth analyses. The Health Surveillance thus provides information on health-related topics and delivers scientifically sound information as a basis for health-promoting discussions in the subsequent follow-up process at various levels (e.g. faculties and departments). In addition, the Health Surveillance plus the additional interviews at CU contributes to comparability with surveys at other German universities through the use of validated and standardized measuring instruments and in-depth qualitative interviews with qualitative content analysis, as well as to add new constructs (i.e., artificial intelligence and digital technology use) as well as democratic competences, as this turned out to be new and important factors. Main hypotheses are

  1. The Health Surveillance gives insights into the state of stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources by using a mixed-methods approach.
  2. With the Health Surveillance, health promotion at CU by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU (and employees at HAW Hamburg), can be guided, and the promotion of mental health (including the reduction of loneliness and discrimination) can be strengthened.
  3. The health of students (and employees at HAW Hamburg), their perceived stress, loneliness and discrimination/minorization (disadvantage) as well as substance use, interrelates with participation in health-promoting activities?
  4. Recommendations can be derived for qualification and skills training of multipliers for health-promoting behavior (e.g., J-peers)?
02

Conditions studied

  • Social Isolation or Loneliness
  • Anxiety
  • Anxiety Depression (Mild or Not Persistent)
  • Health Behavior
  • Observational Study
  • Stress, Psychological
  • Emotional Stress
  • Life Stress
  • Psychological Stress
  • Stress, Emotional
  • Stress (Psychology)
  • Substance Abuse
  • Substance Addiction
  • Substance Dependence
  • Substance Use

Keywords

  • Healthy students
  • Health literacy
  • Disability
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Study characteristics
  • PHQ-4
  • Self-efficacy
  • Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  • Subjective health status
  • Student satisfaction
  • UCLA-LS
  • HEI-Stress
  • Mixed Method
03

In context

Social Isolation

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Isolation; 61 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 373 is above the median of 200 across 35 observational studies indexed under Social Isolation.

Browse Social Isolation studies →

Lead sponsor

Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This project contains three phases, the first one is quantitative phase (2025), the second one is qualitative phase (Dec 2025-April 2026) and the third one is again quantitative phase (2026). All Constructor University students and students Germany-wide who wish to take part in the study will be included. In the quantitative phase, Iinclusion criteria are english English or German language for reading and writing skills, internet access and student status. In the qualitative phase, the inclusion criteria are English or Chinese language and between 18-30 years old. Before the start of the survey period and directly before the start of the online survey or interview, all participants will receive all relevant study information and actively declare their consent to participate in the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • English language skills
  • Reading and writing skills
  • Internet access
  • Student status
  • Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Illiteracy
  • Massively limited cognitive abilities ( i.e. linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used, and questionnaires completed, or interviews participated in) and severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., severe depression)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
373 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • students in a community case study

    Students at Constructor University Bremen being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025

    Other: questionnaire

  • students in Germany

    Students at germany wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire or qualitative interviews in 2026

    Other: questionnaire

  • employees

    Employees at HAW Hamburg wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025

    Other: questionnaire

Interventions

  • Otherquestionnaire

    Questionnaires and interviews were primarily used as assessment and introspection tools to collect data on study participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors. Their purpose was to facilitate measurement and reflection rather than to deliver an intervention. However, it is acknowledged that participation in questionnaires and interviews may have had unintended interventional effects. Specifically, the process of answering questions and reflecting on personal experiences can increase participants' self-awareness, prompt critical reflection, and potentially influence subsequent attitudes or behaviors.

    Also known as: assessments, introspection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Loneliness

    University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada \& Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

  2. Health literacy

    Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner \& Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression and anxiety

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) - 4 Items (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams \& Löwe, 2009), Range 0 (not at all/überhaupt nicht) - 3 (nearly every day/beinahe jeden Tag), higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

  2. Subjective health status

    Subjective health status- 1 Item (WHO, 1996); Range 1 (very good/sehr gut) - 5 (very poor/schlecht), higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

  3. Student satisfaction

    Student satisfaction - 1 Item (Westermann, Heise, Spies \& Trautwein, 1996), Range 0 (not at all satisfied/gar nicht zufrieden) - 100 (completely satisfied/vollkommen zufrieden), higher scores mean better outcome

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

  4. HEI-Stress

    Higher Education Institution Stress (HEI-Stress) - 3 Items (Schmidt, Sieverding, Scheiter \& Obergfell, 2013), Range 0 (not at all stressed/gar nicht gestresst) - 100 (very stressed/sehr gestresst), higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Other outcomes

  1. Artificial intelligence and digital technology use

    Artificial intelligence and digital technology use - 1 Item (adapted from Jerusalem \& Schwarzer, 1999), 1 Item (adapted from Zhang, Tan, Chew, Hew, \& Choo, 2025), 2 Items (adapted from Chen, Y., Chen, G., \& Chen, J., 2026), 3 Items (Norman \& Skinner, 2006)\]

    Time frame: 2026

  2. Democratic competences/ Political Effectiveness/ Efficiency

    • Democratic competences - 4 Items (Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2025; Die Einsamkeit junger Menschen ist eine Gefahr für die Demokratie)

    Time frame: 2026

  3. Belonging; Social Connectedness; Self-Efficacy and Health Behavior

    these outcomes were found to be interrelated with loneliness

    Time frame: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University)
    Bremen, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen 28759, Germany
  • Constructor University Bremen
    Bremen, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen 28759, Germany
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — due to data security

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
2 sites added, 2 sites removed
Show 2 added (2 Germany)
  • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University) · Bremen, Germany
  • Constructor University Bremen · Bremen, Germany
Show 2 removed
  • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University) · Bremen, Germany
  • Constructor University Bremen · Bremen, Germany
Sep 25, 2026
Interventions
Arms added: employees
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    2 sites added, 2 sites removed
    Show 2 added (2 Germany)
    • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University) · Bremen, Germany
    • Constructor University Bremen · Bremen, Germany
    Show 2 removed
    • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University) · Bremen, Germany
    • Constructor University Bremen · Bremen, Germany
    Interventions Arms added: employees
    + 1 other change: description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06899308
Lead sponsor
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Collaborators
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Sonia Lippke (Professor of Health Promotion and Prevention, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2025
Start date
Mar 17, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2026
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Sonia Lippke, PhD
principal investigator · Constructor University Bremen gGmbH & Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion