CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06269250ANDI-MFAUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Acceptance and Perceived Benefits of Digitalization by Medical Assistants

An observational study in Health Care Providers, Patient Safety and eHealth, sponsored by Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this project is to improve the integration of digital processes, including e-prescriptions, within medical and dental practices for healthcare professionals. Through a better understanding of the obstacles healthcare workers encounter during the adoption of digital processes and their feedback post-implementation, this study will add to the current state of science, contributing to digital process optimization in healthcare.

Read the detailed description

This study uses an online questionnaire to collect data from respondents regarding their experiences and observations as healthcare professionals in the implementation of digital processes, as well as their perception of digital processes post-implementation. The survey will be conducted at two different time points, in 2023 and 2024. As part of this initiative, we plan to share the feedback and recommendations gathered with the Federal Minister of Health and relevant authorities in collaboration with GEMATIK.

Main research questions are

I. What challenges do healthcare professionals encounter in the implementation of digital processes? II. How can the offers for the implementation and introduction of digital processes (e.g. e-prescription) in medical practice for medical and dental professionals be supported and optimized?

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Care Providers
  • Patient Safety
  • eHealth

Keywords

  • digital processes
  • e-prescriptions
  • health care providers
  • medical assistants
  • acceptance
  • life-long learning
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Health Care Workers, including medical assistances

Inclusion criteria

- Ability to participate in surveys (e.g., sufficient German or English language skills)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years
  • Illiteracy
  • Massively limited cognitive abilities, i.e., linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used to complete questionnaires or participate in interviews
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • sample assessed in the year 2023

    Participants can be any healthcare worker, including dental and medical assistants, aged 18 or older.

    Other: Policy Change

Interventions

  • OtherPolicy Change

    There will be a change with the digitalization in the health care system with the beginning of the year 2024

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adoption and acceptance of information technology (IT)

    The items assess the adoption and acceptance of telematic infrastructure (TI) in medical or dental practices. They collect data on the use of TI, its impact on daily operations, and its acceptance. These are example items for each category: 1. Is your medical office connected to the Telematics Infrastructure (TI)? (Answer options: "bot at all", "some days", "more than half of the days", "almost every day") 2. Does the TI connection run smoothly without causing disruption to your practice operations? (Answer options: "not at all", "some days", "more than half of the days", "almost every day") 3. Do you know if your (dental) office management fundamentally rejects a TI connection? (Answer options: "I strongly disagree", "I disagree", "I agree", "I strongly agree", "I don't know")

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Requests by patients regarding IT

    The items assess the frequency of patients' inquiries about various digital health applications and services. These are example items: 1. How often have been asked by patients about an e-prescription? (Answer options: "not at all", "some days", "more than half of the days", "almost every day") 2. What topics are you most frequently asked about by your patients? (Answer options: "online medical consultation", "eAU", "e-prescription", "ePA", "digital health apps (DIGAs)", "fitness trackers like smartwatches")

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Perceived Benefits of IT

    The perceived benefits of IT are measured through self-report

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knowledge and Digital health literacy

    The items assess the participants' awareness and knowledge of digital health tools and their ability to access and comprehend health-related information. Example items are: 1. Have you heard of TI applications such as eAU, KIM, e-prescription, ePA, etc.? (Answer options: "I strongly disagree", "I disagree", "I agree", "I strongly agree", "I don't know") 2. Have you heard of "ePA for all"? (Answer options: "I strongly disagree", "I disagree", "I agree", "I strongly agree", "I don't know.") If yes, do you feel well-informed enough to answer questions from patients about it? If no, do you know the informational materials for the waiting room or from another source such as gematik, e.g., regarding e-prescription? 3. Do you know the three redemption methods for the e-prescription? (Answer options: "I strongly disagree", "I disagree", "I agree", "I strongly agree", "I don't know")

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Preferred learning format

    The items assess how healthcare professionals prefer to access information related to their work and digital health applications. Example items are: 1. How often do you actively search the internet for information about digital applications? (Answer options: "never", "almost never", "sometimes", "almost daily", "daily") 2. On which platforms do you seek information when looking for details about digital health applications? (Answer options: Facebook, Facebook group, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Xing, other) 3. How do you prefer to inform yourself about applications related to your work? (multiple answer option)

    Time frame: 3 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Germany
    Bremen, 28759, Germany
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06269250
Lead sponsor
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Alina Dahmen, Dr. med.
study director · Constructor University Bremen gGmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion