ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06884436MACEUpdated Mar 28, 2025

Preoperative Cardiology Consultation and the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events(MACE)

An observational study in Major Adverse Cardiac Events, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and Cardiac Death, Sudden, sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-28.

Sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
22,000
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cohort study aims to determine when preoperative cardiology consultation is needed to reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The study collected data on elderly patients with preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) results who underwent non-cardiac surgery. It was conducted at the First Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2015 to August 2019. MACE was defined as a composite event occurring within 30 days postoperatively, including acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, new-onset severe arrhythmias, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and cardiac death. Data were extracted using structured query language (SQL) and reviewed by three experienced clinicians. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated. Additionally, the study aimed to identify which categories of ECG findings necessitate cardiology consultation to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events, thereby optimizing the cardiology consultation process.

Read the detailed description

Background Preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the important methods for perioperative assessment. It can reflect the patient's cardiac condition to a certain extent and indicate the potential risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). When a patient has an abnormal preoperative ECG, the standard medical procedure is to consult with a cardiologist to assess cardiac risk and adjust cardiac function, thereby reducing the incidence of adverse cardiac events. However, some studies suggest that cardiology consultation may delay surgery for elderly fracture patients and that consultation does not affect the prognosis of some abdominal surgery patients. Conversely, other studies indicate that cardiology consultation can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Additionally, when the patient has a normal ECG, cardiology consultation is usually not provided. Yet, elderly patients often have multiple chronic diseases, and a normal ECG does not completely rule out cardiac problems, which significantly increases the incidence of adverse cardiac events. Therefore, identifying risk factors to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events in elderly non-cardiac surgery patients is particularly important.

Objectives:

To investigate the circumstances in which preoperative cardiology consultation is needed to reduce the incidence rate of MACE.

Methods:

MACE was defined as the composite of acute myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, heart failure (HF), new-onset severe arrhythmia, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and cardiac death, occurring during or within 30 days following non-cardiac surgery. MACE cases were identified by reviewing medical records. Structured query language (SQL) was employed to extract relevant data elements, including postoperative biochemical tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), coronary angiograms, postoperative progress notes, and consultation reports. Patients could experience multiple MACE events. Three experienced clinicians conducted independent evaluations of complications. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus. This cohort study involved non-cardiac surgery patients from the First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, covering the period from January 2015 to August 2019. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated. Additionally, the study aimed to identify which categories of ECG findings necessitate cardiology consultation to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events, thereby optimizing the cardiology consultation process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Adverse Cardiac Events
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
  • Cardiac Death, Sudden
  • Cardiac Arrest (CA)
  • Arrhythmia, Cardiac
  • Heart Failure (HF)
  • Unstable Angina (UA)

Keywords

  • Cardiology Consultation
  • Major Adverse Cardiac Events
  • Preoperative
  • elderly
  • electrocardiogram
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 940 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22,000 is above the median of 514 across 1,574 observational studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese PLA General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 571 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Select elderly patients who underwent elective surgery at the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to August 2019. All subjects will sign an informed consent form; patients who cannot sign the informed consent form will be provided with verbal informed consent.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 65 years;
  • Preoperative results available.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 65 years;
  • Accepted cardiac or neuro surgery;
  • Second surgery within 30 days post-operation;
  • Patient refused to follow up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
22,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Risk Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events

    Identify risk factors through the incidence of major adverse cardiac events occurring within 30 days post-surgery, and analyze the benefits to patients through the intervention of cardiology consultations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MACE

    The entire sample was divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk predictors of MACE and to establish a nomogram with statistically significant predictors. The development cohort was used to construct the MACE prediction model, while the data from the validation cohort were used for validation. Preoperative cardiology consultation was considered as a mediating variable. By modeling, the confounding factors and risk factors for MACE were identified, and the impact of cardiology consultation as a mediating factor on the incidence of postoperative MACE was evaluated.

    Time frame: within 30 days post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Beattie WS, Lalu M, Bocock M, Feng S, Wijeysundera DN, Nagele P, Fleisher LA, Kurz A, Biccard B, Leslie K, Howell S, Landoni G, Grocott H, Lamy A, Richards T, Myles P; StEP COMPAC Group; Patient Comfort; Clinical Indicators; Delirium Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Stroke; Cardiovascular; Data Extractors; Respiratory; Inflammation Sepsis; Acute Kidney Injury; Bleeding Complications Patient Blood Management; Healthcare Resource Utilisation; Patient-Centred Outcomes; Organ Failure and Survival; Cancer Surgery. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: cardiovascular outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PubMed 33092804 ↗
  • Smilowitz NR, Berger JS. Perioperative Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):279-290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7840. PubMed 32692391 ↗
  • Hao L, Xu X, Dupre ME, Guo A, Zhang X, Qiu L, Zhao Y, Gu D. Adequate access to healthcare and added life expectancy among older adults in China. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 9;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01524-9. PubMed 32272883 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Given the sensitive nature of the questions posed in this study, we assured participants that their raw data would remain confidential. Therefore, the raw numerical data used to extrapolate the graphs/charts are not present within the manuscript and will not be disclosed. These data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2015 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 55 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2025
First posted
Mar 19, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2019
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Mar 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06884436
Responsible party
Jingsheng Lou (Professor, Chinese PLA General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 19, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Mar 28, 2025

Study contacts

Jingsheng Lou, PhD & MD
principal investigator · The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion