CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06875037Updated Mar 20, 2025

Patient-related Outcomes When Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

An interventional study of Electric stimulation removable appliance and Traditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-20.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2023, registered Mar 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients will be screened in the Orthodontics Department of the Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Then, the initial diagnostic records (diagnostic plaster casts, intra- and extra-oral photographs, and radiographs) will be studied to ensure the selection criteria are accurately met.

This study aims to compare two groups of patients with Class II malocclusion. Experimental Group: Patients in this group will undergo maxillary canine retraction using the traditional sliding technique with fixed appliances, supplemented by electrical current stimulation.

Control Group: Patients in this group will undergo maxillary canine retraction using the traditional sliding technique with fixed appliances, without any acceleration method.

Read the detailed description

Maxillary canine retraction can be lengthy, and various methods have been employed to accelerate it. Electrical current stimulation has shown promise as a technique for speeding up tooth movement. However, only a limited number of studies have been documented in the literature. Controlled clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure in accelerating tooth movement, its impact on pain responses, and other patient-centred outcomes.

Participants will be selected from patients attending the Orthodontics Department at the Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University. Eligible patients with Class II/Division I malocclusion who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this trial after being screened by the researcher. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients who agree to join the study after receiving an information sheet.

Alignment and leveling will be performed using pre-adjusted fixed orthodontic appliances consisting of 0.022 x 0.028-inch metal brackets with the MBT prescription. The traditional wiring sequence will be followed until a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel base wire is in place.

Maxillary first premolars will be extracted during the leveling and alignment phase, with more than two months between the completion of the alignment phase and the extraction. This ensures that the phenomenon of regional acceleration generated by the extraction does not affect the rate of tooth movement.

Canine retraction will be achieved using closed-coil nickel-titanium (NiTi) springs extending from the upper first molar band hook to the canine bracket hook. A force of 150 grams will be applied to each side, and the force will be checked using a force meter at each appointment (every two weeks) until the canine retraction is complete, achieving a Class I canine relationship.

A small electrical current will be applied to the upper maxillary canine area using a removable intraoral appliance containing a micro electrical circuit. Each patient in the experimental group will be asked to wear the electrical accelerator in their mouth for 5 hours daily.

02

Conditions studied

  • Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Malocclusion

457 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is above the median of 36 across 372 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 17 to 28 years.
  • Class II Division 1 malocclusion (according to Angle's classification) requires the extraction of the upper first premolar as part of the orthodontic treatment plan.
  • Mild to moderate skeletal Class II (ANB = 5-7).
  • Overjet of 5 to 10 mm.
  • Normal or vertical growth patterns (MM ≥ 26; SN-MP ≥ 33; Y Axis ≥ 65)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe dental crowding.
  • Missing teeth in the upper arch.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Health conditions or long-term medication.
  • Periodontal disease.
  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Smoking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electrical Stimulation Group

    Patients in this group will undergo conventional orthodontic treatment combined with electrical stimulation for the retraction of upper canines.

    Device: Electric stimulation removable appliance

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Traction Group

    Patients in this group will receive conventional orthodontic treatment without any acceleration method.

    Procedure: Traditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration

Interventions

  • DeviceElectric stimulation removable appliance

    The device will be used with the fixed appliance to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (i.e., canine retraction).

  • ProcedureTraditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration

    The traditional method of canine retraction will be employed using fixed appliances. No additional appliances will be used to activate orthodontic tooth movement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the perception of pain

    Patients will be asked to rate their pain perception with the question, "What is the degree of pain you are experiencing at this moment?" They will indicate their pain level by placing a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line. The left end of the line represents no pain (VAS=0), and the right end signifies maximum (unimaginable) pain (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

  2. Change in the perception of discomfort

    Patients will be asked to rate their perception of discomfort with the question, "What is the degree of discomfort you are experiencing at this moment?" They will indicate their level of discomfort by placing a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line. The left end of the line represents no discomfort (VAS=0), while the right end signifies maximum (unimaginable) discomfort (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in difficulty swallowing

    Patients will be asked to rate their perception of difficulty swallowing with the question, "What is the degree of difficulty swallowing you are experiencing at this moment?" They will indicate their level of difficulty swallowing by placing a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line. The left end of the line represents no difficulty swallowing (VAS=0), while the right end signifies maximum difficulty swallowing (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

  2. Change in the chewing ability

    Patients will be asked to rate their perception of chewing ability with the question, "What is the degree of difficulty you are experiencing in chewing?" They will indicate their level of chewing difficulty by placing a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line. The left end of the line represents no difficulty (VAS=0), while the right end signifies maximum difficulty in mastication (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

  3. Change in the speech ability

    Patients will be asked to rate their perception of speech ability with the question, "What is the degree of difficulty you are experiencing in speech?" They will indicate their level of speech difficulty by placing a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line. The left end of the line represents no difficulty (VAS=0), while the right end signifies maximum difficulty (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

  4. Change in analgesic consumption

    Patients will be asked the following question about "Analgesic Consumption": "Did you need to take pain analgesics?" Analgesic consumption is assessed by inquiring if the study participant took analgesics, using a two-point scale (1. Yes or 2. No).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed at the following assessment times: on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first, second, and third months from the start of the canine retraction.

  5. Patients' satisfaction

    Patients will be asked to evaluate their satisfaction with orthodontic treatment with the question, "How satisfied are you with your orthodontic treatment?" Satisfaction for both groups will be assessed by having the study participant place a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line to indicate their level of satisfaction. The left end of the line represents no satisfaction (VAS=0), while the right end signifies maximum satisfaction (VAS=100).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fourth month of the canine retraction

  6. Recommendation of the procedure to a friend

    Patients will be asked the following question about the likelihood of recommending the procedure to their friends: "Would you recommend this treatment to a friend?" Those in the experimental group will indicate their response using a two-point scale (1. Yes, or 2. No).

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the end of the fourth month of the canine retraction

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
    Damascus, DM20AM19, Syrian Arab Republic
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mousa MM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Darwich KMA, Almahdi WH, Aljabban O, Awawdeh MA, Almasri IA. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Flapless Corticotomy with Low-Level Laser Therapy in En Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 22;13(6):1501-1519. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13060132. PubMed 38131681 ↗
  • Mousa MM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Almahdi WH. Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during surgically-assisted acceleration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2022 Dec 1;44(6):622-635. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac038. PubMed 35796046 ↗
  • Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Mahmoud GA, Almasri IA, Jaber ST, Alam MK. Patient-reported outcomes during accelerating the en-masse retraction of the upper anterior teeth using low-intensity electrical stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2024 May 13;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40510-024-00517-3. PubMed 38735912 ↗
  • Alfailany DT, Hajeer MY, Awawdeh MA, Khursheed Alam M, Darwich KMA, Aljabban O, Latifeh Y, Alhaffar JB, Almasri IA. Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Associated With the Acceleration of Canine Retraction by Piezosurgery in Comparison With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51779. eCollection 2024 Jan. PubMed 38192530 ↗
  • Charavet C, Lecloux G, Jackers N, Maes N, Lambert F. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following a piezocision-assisted versus conventional orthodontic treatments: a randomized controlled trial in adults. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4355-4363. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02887-z. Epub 2019 Apr 6. PubMed 30955096 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06875037
Lead sponsor
Damascus University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 6, 2024
Completion
Dec 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 20, 2025

Study contacts

Mohammad N. Kheshfeh, DDS
principal investigator · Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
study director · Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion