An interventional study of Palliative care video comprises the conversation and advance directives. and Palliative care written material in Multiple Sclerosis, MS, sponsored by Hunter College of City University of New York. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.
Sponsored by Hunter College of City University of New York · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This study is using a central, computer-generated simple randomization technique. Participants will be randomly assigned to groups within the constraints of ensuring balanced representation of gender, ethnicity, and race.
One-half of the patients are randomized to the decision aid video model, and one-half will serve as controls and receive a palliative care (PC) informational sheet. Sessions are designed to be consistent with PC principles of care using constructs from the Murray's transition theory including knowledge development coupled with advanced care planning (ACP)-to drive palliative care alongside curative treatment, and to support people with chronic progressive illnesses. The 2 groups will complete the demographic forms, and pre- and post-tests, at baseline and after three months. The intervention group will view the video decision aid, which takes 10 minutes, during their follow up appointment. The controls will read written information of the same content shown on the video and will complete similar questionnaires. The video opens with empathic statements regarding the situation in which patients may find themselves, including an introduction about medical decisions, and statements regarding values and spiritual beliefs and their impact on decision-making. The video translates the information into actionable medical orders using a three-goal framework: life-prolonging care, limited/blended care, and comfort care. The video describes the features of each of the goals of care and the risks and benefits of each option using visual images that illustrate the interventions. Patients will review the video using iPads and will be able to review the video again as needed. The Flesch-Kincaid ease score for the video narration is 71.6; for the "Conversation" piece, it is 65.9. These indicate that the passages require approximately a 7th or 8th grade reading level, which Flesch suggests makes them "easy to read" and "plain English," respectively.
The goal of the video intervention is to help patients express their values and health goals, while achieving their life and core values. The intervention group will view the video which includes modules to teach patients strategies for expressing their concerns and enhance their self-efficacy, helping them overcome any barriers. To enhance intervention fidelity, an ACP facilitator guide will be developed as reference for the intervention implementation. It will detail the key topics and purposes of each session of the intervention, the guiding questions, and the facilitation skills.
Aim 1: To explore the preferences of patients with neuroinflammatory diseases, PC knowledge, decisional conflict, and preparation for decision making among 50 adult (18-65 years old) patients randomly assigned to one of two PC modalities: 1. a video depicting PC goals of care (intervention group, n=25), or 2. standard usual care using PC written information (control group, n=25).
H1a: Patients randomized to the video will have higher documented preferences and fewer preferences for life-prolonging interventions (primary outcome) than the control group. The intervention group will have greater knowledge, lower decisional conflict, and greater preparation for decision making than those randomized to the control group.
Aim 2: To compare PC conversations and documentation at 3 months among patients with neuroinflammatory diseases.
H2: Patients randomized to the video will have more PC conversations and higher rates of PC documentation after 3 months.
Patients will be asked for their goals-of-care preferences at baseline, after watching the video or reading the information sheet and after three months. Patients will be asked for their goals-of-care preference (Life-prolonging, Limited/Blended, Comfort, or Unsure), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preference (Yes, No, or Unsure), and ventilatory support (Yes, No, or Unsure) at baseline, and then again immediately after watching the video or reviewing the informational sheet, and then the investigators will contact all patients after 3 months by telephone to ask for their preferences again. The investigators will also have an open-ended question for those subjects who change their preferences from the initial post-video or control survey ("Can patients tell us more about why they have changed their preference from the one stated before?"). The primary outcome is patient treatment preferences (i.e., care considerations, discontinuation of care, versus continued full care) for neurological care (Aim 1). The preferences will be measured as a binary outcome based on our clinical experience. When a patient chooses "" as an option for any of the treatment outcomes, in clinical care that is equivalent to the default (i.e., full code or life-prolonging interventions). Secondary outcomes include knowledge, decisional conflict, and preparation for decision making (Aims 1). The investigators will also explore the stability of preferences and documentation after 3 months (Aim 2). In all of investigators' prior trials, 3 months has been the requisite amount of time needed for patients to contemplate their decisions regarding medical care.
3,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 659 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 2,201 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.
Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →Hunter College of City University of New York is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The control arm will follow standard of care which comprises palliative care (PC)written material about the PC conversation and advance directives.
Behavioral: Palliative care written material
The intervention group wil view a palliative care (PC) video discussing the PC conservation and advanced care planning (ACP).
Behavioral: Palliative care video comprises the conversation and advance directives.
The palliative care video was done in a way that facilitates discussion and minimizes anxiety or any psychological risk/burden. The video is narrated by a young adult who opens with an empathic statement regarding the situation the young adult/adult patient finds themselves in. Then, there is a transition to contemplating what the future might hold and decisions about medical care and introducing the concept of ACP. There is acknowledgment that decision making is difficult, and that the presence of caregivers often helps. There is an explicit statement regarding values and spiritual beliefs and how that might impact decision making. The video then attempts to translate the preceding conversation into actionable medical orders using the most common three-goal framework that is based on the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) paradigm: life-prolonging care, limited/blended care and comfort care.
Written materials about palliative care conversation and advance directives.
Palliative care preferences (i.e., care considerations, discontinuation of care, versus continued full care) for neurological care (Aim 1).
The patient treatment preferences (i.e., care considerations, discontinuation of care, versus continued full care) for neurological care. The preferences will be measured based on a questionnaire asking patients about their preferences after viewing the PC video or reading the written material.
Time frame: 3 months.
Palliative care knowledge
The palliative care knoeldge will be assessed using the palliative care knowledge scale (PaCKS). This scale has 13 questions on palliative care definitions and goals.
Time frame: 3 months
Preparation for decision making
The investigators will assess patients/care partners' perception of how useful a decision aid is in communicating and making decisions using the well-validated Preparation for Decision Making Scale.
Time frame: 3 months
Decisional conflict
The Decision Conflict validated scale measures uncertainty regarding decision making associated with palliative care.
Time frame: 3 months.
Advance care planning engagement
Advance care planning (ACP) engagement: The investigators will use the ACPE 15 questions tool about engagement, which is a well-validated tool.
Time frame: 3 months.
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 16 months after the start.
Of 847 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 16 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 869 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hunter College of City University of New York