ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06843135HARMONYUpdated Feb 24, 2025

Synchrony in Cardiac Conduction: Assessing the Effects of Pacing on Cardiac Performance Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Advanced ECG-imaging

An interventional study of Ventricular pacing in Heart Failure and AV Block, sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is an established and effective therapy for patients with atrioventricular (AV) block. However, frequent RVP has been associated with left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and may progess heart failure. Conduction system pacing (CSP), a recently introduced alternative to RVP, aims to preserve physiological ventricular activation by engaging the heart's native conduction system. CSP includes diverse pacing approaches such as selective or non-selective His-bundle pacing, selective left bundle pacing, and LV-septal pacing, each with varying levels of fidelity in reproducing normal conduction. The mechanical impact of these distinct CSP strategies on left and right ventricular (RV) performance remains poorly understood.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), a non-invasive and highly accurate tool for assessing cardiac structure and function, is uniquely positioned to elucidate the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance. This trial aims to evaluate the comparative mechanical effects of these pacing strategies, potentially identifying the optimal approach for improving outcomes in patients with AV block.

Objective To investigate and compare the effects of CSP and RVP on cardiac performance, as assessed by CMR and electrocardiographic imaging (ECG-imaging).

Main Trial Endpoints The primary endpoints are measures of LV and RV performance assessed via CMR, including: ventricular volumes, ejection fraction (EF), and myocardial strain

Secondary Trial Endpoints

Secondary endpoints include:

Safety and Feasibility:

  • Adverse events (e.g., troponin release, lead displacement, arrhythmias, heart failure).
  • Technical feasibility (e.g., ease of device implantation, ability to maintain proper pacing).

Electrophysiological Assessment:

  • Degree of selectivity in engaging the native conduction system.
  • Ventricular activation times as assessed by ECG-imaging.

Trial Design This is a randomized, controlled, single blind, two-center crossover trial. Participants will undergo CSP and RVP in a randomized sequence, each for six months. CMR and ECG-imaging will be performed at 6 months (end of the first pacing phase) and 12 months (end of the second pacing phase).

Trial Population The trial will enroll 88 patients with a normal of at most mildly reduced ejection fraction and an indication for ventricular pacing.

Interventions Participants will undergo CMR and ECG-imaging at 6 months and 12 months.

Ethical Considerations This trial is designed to advance understanding of the mechanical and clinical effects of CSP relative to RVP in patients with AV block. The anticipated benefits include improved cardiac performance and enhanced quality of life. The primary burden to participants is the requirement for an additional CMR scan, which may be perceived as inconvenient or even stressful. The trial minimizes risk by utilizing established clinical procedures and closely monitoring participants for adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • AV Block
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 88 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with a of ≥35%
  • Patients with an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree atrioventricular block where the degree of anticipated RV pacing is >20% including:
  • Third degree AV block
  • Symptomatic or asymptomatic second-degree AV block
  • High degree AV block
  • Pace and ablate (AV-node ablation)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • CRT indication (patients with heart failure ( >1) in sinus rhythm with (LVEF) \<35%, QRS duration >150 ms, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology despite optimised medical therapy)
  • Inability to undergo CMR (i.e. severe claustrophobia or MRI )
  • \<12 months
  • Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Presence of severe valve disease or mechanical valves
  • Any prior attempt at implantation of an ICD, CRT, CSP
  • Permanent AF with rapid ventricular response, unless pace and ablate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conduction system pacing

    Device: Ventricular pacing

  • Active comparator
    Right ventricular pacing

    Device: Ventricular pacing

Interventions

  • DeviceVentricular pacing

    Participants will undergo conductionsystem pacing and right ventricular pacing in a randomized sequence, each for six months. After each phase, patients will undergo a CMR scan and advanced ECG imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint is LV ejection fraction measured on CMR

    Time frame: At 6 months after crossover

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Mar 2028, 36 months later.

Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2025
First posted
Feb 24, 2025
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
Last update
Feb 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06843135
Responsible party
Luuk Hopman (Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Study contacts

Dr. Hopman
Contact
l.hopman@amsterdamumc.nl
+31204444105

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion