CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07846046ENSUREUpdated Sep 29, 2026

Endoscopic (EID) Versus Surgical (TAMIS) Local Excision for Early Stage Rectal Cancer

An interventional study of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection (EID) and Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) in Rectal Cancer Stage I, sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Not yet recruiting at 19 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-29.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this clinical trial, we compare the endoscopic technique, endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID), with the surgical technique, transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for the treatment of early stage rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate whether one of them leads to better outcomes.

Researchers will focus particularly on:

  • How effectively each technique completely removes the cancer
  • How quickly patients recover after treatment and whether complications occur
  • Outcomes after three years (does the cancer go away, or does it come back?)
  • The impact of both techniques on bowel function and quality of life

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to receive either surgical or endoscopic treatment for their rectal cancer
  • Keep a diary twice a day to record pain symptoms and recovery during the first 30 days after treatment and complete questionnaires within a 3 year period
  • Visit the clinic for follow-up appointments within a 3 year period
Read the detailed description

In the Netherlands, more than 3,000 people are diagnosed with rectal cancer each year. Approximately one-third of these patients have early-stage disease (cT1-2N0M0). Due to the low risk of lymph node metastasis, these cancers are potentially suitable for local, organ-preserving treatment. If histological analysis confirms complete removal without high-risk features, major rectal surgery can be avoided. For suspected deep submucosal invasive cancer of the rectum, a local excision (LE) can be performed by gastroenterologists using EID or by surgeons using TAMIS. Although both LE approaches are considered standard treatment for early stage rectal cancer (T1b), they have never been directly compared. This national study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of these two approaches. Should both techniques prove equally effective at completely removing rectal T1b, EID may offer a less burdensome and more cost-effective treatment option.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer Stage I

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Early Stage Rectal Cancer
  • Local Excision
  • T1b rectal cancer
  • Deep submucosal invasive rectal cancer
  • Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID)
  • Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS)
  • Organ-preserving treatment
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, a patient must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age).
  • Suspected rectal D-SMIC based on optical diagnosis using narrow-band imaging:
  • Hiroshima C2/3, JNET 3, NICE III, Kudo Vn pit pattern.
  • The presence of non-lifting together with features of superficial submucosal invasion (Hiroshima C1, JNET 2B, Kudo Vi pit pattern).
  • MRI shows cT1-T2 invasion and minimum of 1 mm preserved muscularis propria.
  • Tumour with its lower border situated on or below the level of the sigmoid take off as shown on rectal MRI.
  • Staging rectal MRI confirms absence of suspicious malignant mesorectal lymph nodes, defined as mucinous lymph nodes, perirectal lymph nodes >9 mm in short-axis diameter, or ≥7 mm for lateral lymph nodes (classified as certain cN+), or 5-9 mm peri-rectal lymph nodes with at least 2 suspect morphological features: round shape, heterogeneity and/or irregular borders (classified as doubtful cN+).
  • Staging rectal MRI confirms absence of tumour deposits.
  • Staging rectal MRI confirms absence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

A patient who meets one or more of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Lesions involving more than 50% of the circumference.
  • Total lesion size larger than 6 cm.
  • Prior endoscopic or surgical resection attempts of the tumour.
  • Recurrent cancer after previous surgical or endoscopic local resection.
  • Severe pre-existing faecal incontinence with impaired quality of life.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with previous inflammation of the rectum.
  • Previous pelvic irradiation or neoadjuvant therapy.
  • Poor general health that prevents the use of general anaesthesia.
  • Inability or contraindication to undergo MRI scan.
  • Concomitant malignancies or other severe medical conditions that, in the opinion of the multidisciplinary team (MDT), are likely to result in death within 5 years.
  • AJCC stage II, III or IV CRC within the last 5 years or synchronous CRC.
  • Inability to complete questionnaires or sign informed consent.
  • Known pregnancy.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
246 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID)

    A participant randomly allocated to the EID arm will undergo an EID procedure at one of the participating study centres. Pre-procedural preparation and perioperative management will follow the standard-of-care protocols. The EID procedure will be performed according to the procedure definition and study protocol.

    Procedure: Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection (EID)

  • Active comparator
    Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS)

    A participant randomly allocated to the TAMIS arm will undergo a TAMIS procedure at one of the participating study centres. Participants will be prepared according to the standard-of-care protocol. TAMIS will be performed as a full-thickness approach according to the procedure protocol; however, for lesions located in areas with limited or absent mesorectal fat, a full-thickness excision should be avoided. In these cases, an intermuscular approach may be adopted. The planned dissection plane (full-thickness or intermuscular) will be determined by the study steering committee based on preoperative radiographic and endoscopic assessment.

    Procedure: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS)

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic Intermuscular Dissection (EID)

    EID is an endoscopic local excision technique used for the resection of early-stage rectal tumours. The procedure uses a flexible endoscope to dissect between the inner (circular) and outer (longitudinal) muscles of the m. propria leaving the outer rectal wall layers intact. It is performed under conscious sedation by a gastroenterologist.

  • ProcedureTransanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS)

    TAMIS is a minimally invasive transanal surgical technique used for the local excision of early-stage rectal tumours. A transanal platform is inserted into the anus to allow access with laparoscopic instruments. The procedure may be performed using a full-thickness or an intermuscular approach, based on tumour characteristics and surgical planning. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia by surgeons.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of complete R0 resection between TAMIS and EID procedures

    The rate of complete R0 resection, defined as complete en-bloc resection with cancer free resection margins of \>0.1mm, will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after local excision procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of procedure-related adverse events

    Procedure-related adverse events will be registered and recorded according to standard clinical practice in the Dutch Registration of Complications of Endoscopy (DRCE) or Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA). Details of all procedure-related complications within 30 days will be recorded in the eCRF and entered in ALEA database.

    Time frame: Procedure-related adverse events will be recorded for 30 days post-procedure.

  2. Postprocedural pain scores

    Post-procedural recovery and pain will be assessed using a pain diary for the first 30 days following the procedure. Participants will record their daily pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS), as well as their use of analgesic medication, until they report no pain for two consecutive days.

    Time frame: VAS scores will be recorded for 30 days post-procedure

  3. Recovery scores

    Post-procedural recovery will be assessed for the first 30 days following the procedure. Level of recovery, defined as the participant's ability to perform activities of daily living, will be recorded at on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 post-procedure.

    Time frame: Assessed 30 days post-procedure

  4. Rate of curative local excisions for pT1sm2-3 rectal cancer

    The rate of curative local excisions for pT1sm2-3 rectal cancer will be recorded. A curative local excision refers to pT1sm2-3 lesions with a complete R0 resection and the absence of additional histological risk factors.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after local excision procedure

  5. Dissection plane evaluation

    The rate of concordance between the definitive dissection plane and initially intended dissection plane prior to local excision (e.g., presence of longitudinal m. propria following an intended intermuscular dissection) will be evaluated. Only CRC pathologists trained within the PATCH study will assess the EID and TAMIS specimens to minimize interobserver variability.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after local excision procedure

  6. Quality of local excision specimen

    The quality of local excision specimens will be reviewed by a CRC pathologist for segment fragmentation, margin assessment, and the presence of muscularis propria underneath the invasive front (circular/longitudinal). Histological handling and evaluation of the resection specimen will be performed at participating centers according to standard care procedures. Only CRC pathologists trained within the PATCH study will handle EID and TAMIS specimens to minimize interobserver variability.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after local excision procedure

  7. Postoperative adverse events

    In the event that a total mesorectal excision (TME) is performed after local excision, post-operative adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification) will be assessed for the first 30 days following TME.

    Time frame: Assessed for the first 30 days post-operatively

  8. TME specimen quality after EID vs TAMIS

    In the event that a total mesorectal excision (TME) is performed after local excision, the quality of completion surgery will be systematically assessed. This includes TME specimen quality (Quirke classification).

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after TME

  9. Circumferential resection margin status following completion surgery

    In the event that a total mesorectal excision (TME) is performed after local excision, the quality of completion surgery will be systematically assessed. This includes circumferential resection margin status.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after TME

  10. Conversion rate to laparotomy

    In the event that a total mesorectal excision (TME) is performed after local excision, the quality of completion surgery will be systematically assessed. This includes conversion rate to laparotomy.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after TME

  11. Rate of non-restorative TME procedures

    In the event that a total mesorectal excision (TME) is performed after local excision, the quality of completion surgery will be systematically assessed. This includes rate of non-restorative procedures.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after TME

  12. Functional Outcomes

    Functional outcomes will be measured using the validated Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The LARS score is 5-question survey tool used to measure bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Total points range from 0 to 42, in which a higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and poor bowel functionality.

    Time frame: Functional outcomes will be measured via LARS scores within a period of 12 months.

  13. Health related quality of life (QLQ-C30)

    Health related Quality of Life (QoL) will be assessed using the validated Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) surveys. The QLQ-C30 contains 30 questions that measure the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. All of the scales and single-items range from 0 to 100. A higher score for the functioning scales and global health status implies a better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms. Questionnaires will be sent at baseline, 1, 3, 12, and 36 months. All questionnaires will be sent at predefined intervals electronically or collected on paper forms.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be completed within a period of 3 years.

  14. Health related quality of life (QLQ-CR29)

    Health related Quality of Life (QoL) will be assessed using the validated Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Research 29 (QLQ-CR29). This survey contains 29 questions regarding burden of symptoms, side effects, body image, and sexual functioning. Scores scale from 0-100 with higher scores on symptom scales indicating a higher symptom burden, while higher scores on functional scales indicate better functionality. Questionnaires will be sent at baseline, 1, 3, 12, and 36 months. All questionnaires will be sent at predefined intervals electronically or collected on paper forms.

    Time frame: Surveys will be completed within a period of 3 years.

  15. Health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Health-related quality of life (QoL) will be assessed using the validated EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L assesses health across five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on a five-level scale from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), with higher scores indicating greater impairment in the respective health dimension. The EQ-5D-5L will be completed at baseline and at 1, 3, 12, and 36 months post-procedure. Questionnaires will be completed electronically or, where necessary, using paper forms.

    Time frame: Surveys will be completed within a period of 3 years.

  16. Rectal preservation and stoma free survival

    The use of stoma and rates of rectal preservation will be measured within a 3 year period.

    Time frame: Following completion of procedure to end of follow-up at 3 years

  17. Cancer recurrence rates

    Intramural, locoregional, and distant 3-year cancer recurrence rates will be measured.

    Time frame: Cancer recurrences will be measured over a 3 year follow-up period

  18. Survival Rates

    Three-year disease-specific and overall survival will be measured within the 3 year follow-up period.

    Time frame: Survival will be measured within the 3 year follow-up period.

  19. Healthcare costs

    Healthcare costs will be measured using the validated iMCQ and iPCQ questionnaires at 1, 3, 12 and 36 months.

    Time frame: Healthcare costs will be measured from the time of enrollment to the end of the follow-up period at 3 years.

06

Study locations

19 sites
  • NoordWest Ziekenhuisgroep
    Alkmaar, Netherlands
    • Wing Liu · Contact · w.s.liu@nwz.nl · +31 72 - 548 3324
    • Mich Dunker, MD PhD · Principal investigator
  • Flevoziekenhuis
    Almere Stad, Netherlands
  • Meander Medisch Centrum
    Amersfoort, 3813 TZ, Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
    • Elena A Kasantsidis, MD · Contact · ENSURE@amsterdamumc.nl · +31 651768033
    • Elena Kasantsidis, MD · Sub investigator
    • Barbara Bastiaansen, MD · Principal investigator
  • Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Yanaika Tankink · Contact · y.tankink@nki.nl · +31 020 512 9111
    • Brechtje Grotenhuis, MD PhD · Principal investigator
  • OLVG
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • Simone Röttgering · Contact · s.rottgering@olvg.nl · +31 20 510 87 77
    • Michael Gerhards, MD PhD · Principal investigator
  • Ijsselland Ziekenhuis
    Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
    • Sita Willigen · Contact · swilligen@ysl.nl · +31 102585180
    • Pascal Doornebosch, MD · Principal investigator
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
    Deventer, Netherlands
    • Alinda Guitink · Contact · a.guitink@dz.nl · +31 (570) 53 51 05
    • Frank ter Borg, MD · Principal investigator
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
    Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Spaarne Gasthuis
    Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Dijklander Ziekenhuis
    Hoorn, Netherlands
    • Maisha van der Zon · Contact · DOC@dijklander.nl · +31 229257823
    • Joris van den Broek, MD · Principal investigator
  • Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum
    Leiden, Netherlands
    • Jurjen Boonstra, MD PhD · Contact · j.j.boonstra@lumc.nl · +31 71 526 35 75
    • Jurjen Boonstra, MD PhD · Principal investigator
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
    Nieuwegein, Netherlands
  • Laurentius Ziekenhuis
    Roermond, Netherlands
    • Annette Meijer · Contact · annette.meijer@lzr.nl · +31(475) 38 27 68
    • Jeroen Leijtens, MD · Principal investigator
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum
    Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
    The Hague, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
    Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
  • Isala
    Zwolle, Netherlands
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07846046
Lead sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Responsible party
Barbara Bastiaansen (Gastroenterologist, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2026

Study contacts

Elena A Kasantsidis, MD
Contact
e.a.kasantsidis@amsterdamumc.nl
+31 651768033
Barbara Bastiaansen, MD
principal investigator · Amsterdam University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion