ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06841003ALPACAUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Laparoscopic Antibiotic Lavage to Prevent Intra-abdominal Abscess Formation in Complicated Appendicitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Laparoscopic antibiotic peritoneal lavage with gentamicin / clindamycin in Complicated Appendicitis and Intra-Abdominal Abscess, sponsored by Spaarne Gasthuis. Recruiting at 11 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Spaarne Gasthuis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Updated Oct 9, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in Netherlands+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
752
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute surgical admission. Presently, two types of appendicitis are distinguished: complicated and uncomplicated (phlegmonous). Complicated appendicitis (CA) is defined as gangrenous and/or perforated appendicitis and/or appendicitis with an intra-abdominal or pelvic abscess. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the preferential mode of surgical treatment. However, development of an intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) remains an important and clinically relevant complication following appendectomy, especially in complicated appendicitis. Although patients with complicated appendicitis receive postoperative intravenous antibiotics, the incidence of IAA remains considerable. The reported incidence of IAA in children and adults with CA is 7.9% - 24%. We recently reported an IAA rate of 12.3% after laparoscopic appendectomy for CA in our own institution. Patients with IAA are readmitted and treated with either antibiotics, image-guided percutaneous drainage, surgical reintervention, or a combination of these treatments. Furthermore, IAA represents a considerable burden for the healthcare system with high readmission rates and reinterventions, prolonged hospital stay, and therefore increased medical costs. Intra operative techniques aiming at more effective infection source control represent a clinically relevant area of investigation. Laparoscopic antibiotic lavage represents a promising concept in order to reduce intra-abdominal abscess formation. Antibiotic lavage is mainly known for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis. Several studies show promising results of antibiotic peritoneal lavage on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) including IAA in patients with CA. However, these studies were retrospective or conducted in a small number of patients who underwent an open appendectomy while high quality randomized controlled trials have not been performed yet.

The aim of the ALPACA study is to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic antibiotic peritoneal lavage with gentamicin / clindamycin for 3 minutes after appendectomy on the incidence of IAA in patients with CA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complicated Appendicitis
  • Intra-Abdominal Abscess

Browse trials for

03

In context

Abdominal Abscess

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Abscess; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 752 is above the median of 105 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Abscess.

Browse Abdominal Abscess studies →

Lead sponsor

Spaarne Gasthuis is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients ≥ 8 years with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis either with or without clinical or radiological suspicion of CA undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy for intra-operative confirmed CA that can provide a signed written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 8 years;
  • Not able to give (language barrier, legally incapable)
  • Any for the use of the study medication:

    • to clindamycin or to any of the benzyl alcohol, sodium edetate, water, or to lincomycin;
    • Hypersensitivity to gentamicin or to sodium metabisulfite: particularly in asthmatic patients, this may trigger bronchospasms and anaphylactic shock or to any of the excipients: disodium edetate, sodium hydroxide, sodium metabisulfite (E223), water for injections;
  • Severe sepsis defined as sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction that includes any of the following thought to be caused by the infection:

    • Sepsis-induced hypotension
    • Lactate above upper limits laboratory normal
    • Urine output \<0.5 mL/kg/h for more than 2h despite adequate fluid resuscitation
    • Acute lung injury with PaO2/FiO2 \<250 in the absence of pneumonia as infection source
    • Acute lung injury with PaO2/FiO2 \<200 in the presence of pneumonia as infection source
    • Creatinine >2.0 mg/dL (176.8 μmol/L)
    • >2mg/dL (34.2 μmol/L)
    • count \< 100,000 μL
    • Coagulopathy ( (INR) > 1.5);
  • score;
  • Known ;
  • Renal dysfunction (i.e. ≤ 60);
  • patients (i.e. hematological malignancies, /AIDS, bone marrow transplantation, splenectomy, genetic disorders such as severe combined immunodeficiency, chemotherapy, dialysis, solid organ transplant, and immunosuppressant use (such as in patients with rheumatoid arthritis));
  • Pregnancy;
  • Known allergies to either gentamicin or clindamycin;
  • Known colonization of bacteria resistant to either gentamicin or clindamycin;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
752 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Laparoscopic antibiotic lavage

    Drug: Laparoscopic antibiotic peritoneal lavage with gentamicin / clindamycin

  • No intervention
    Control group

Interventions

  • DrugLaparoscopic antibiotic peritoneal lavage with gentamicin / clindamycin

    Peritoneal antibiotic lavage using a solution of gentamicin/clindamycin in NaCl 0.9%.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (IAA)

    Time frame: Within 30 days follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of participants with wound infections measured by tracking any wound complications that these patients have and comparing the incidence between treatment arms

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  2. Number of participants receiving each type of treatment for the intra-abdominal abscess, consisting of percutaneous (radiological drainage), surgical drainage, antibiotic treatment or observation only

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  3. Microorganisms Identified in Intra-operative Aspirate Cultures

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  4. Operating time

    Time frame: From the moment of start surgery (the incision) to wound closure.

  5. Readmission rate

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  6. Reoperation rate

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  7. Length of stay (including readmission)

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  8. Adverse events of antibiotic peritoneal lavage

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  9. Surgical complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  10. Mortality

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  11. Quality of life

    Measured by digital questionnaire of EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  12. The number of postoperative consultations will be measured by tracking any postoperative consultation that these patients have and comparing the incidence between treatment arms

    Including emergency department visits, telephone consultations and outpatient consultations

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  13. Cost-effectivity (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)

    Cost-effectivity will be determined by IMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  14. Microbial cultures of postoperative intra-abdominal asbcess, based on cultures

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

  15. Healthcare Costs (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)

    The cost-effectivity will be determined by iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire

    Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up

07

Study locations

10 of 11 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 28 months after the start.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 9, 2026: primary completion Mar 2027 → Jun 2027 and completion May 2027 → Jun 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2025
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
StartActual
Feb 24, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027was Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027was May 2027
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 9, 2026
Sites
11 sites added — first site in Netherlands
Show 11 added (11 Netherlands)
  • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · Heerlen, Netherlands
  • Máxima MC · Veldhoven, Netherlands
  • Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · Alkmaar, Netherlands
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis · Beverwijk, Netherlands
  • Spaarne Gasthuis · Hoofddorp, Netherlands
  • Dijklander Ziekenhuis · Hoorn, Netherlands
  • Zaans Medisch Centrum · Zaandam, Netherlands
  • Ziekenhuisgroep Twente · Almelo, Netherlands
  • Isala · Zwolle, Netherlands
  • Ijsselland Ziekenhuis · Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
  • Meander Medisch Centrum · Amersfoort, Netherlands
Oct 9, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027→Jun 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Study completion
May 2027→Jun 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Secondary outcomes
4 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedTheNumber of participants receiving each type of treatment for the intra-abdominal abscess, consisting of percutaneous (radiological drainage), surgical drainage, antibiotic treatment or observation onlyTime frame: Within 90-days follow-up
  • EditedMicrobial cultures of intraMicroorganisms Identified in Intra-operative aspirate, based on culturesAspirate CulturesTime frame: Within 90-days follow-up
  • ChangedBefore Cost-effectivity,Now Cost-effectivity (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up
  • ChangedBefore Cost-effectivityNow Healthcare Costs (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    11 sites added — first site in Netherlands
    Show 11 added (11 Netherlands)
    • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · Heerlen, Netherlands
    • Máxima MC · Veldhoven, Netherlands
    • Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · Alkmaar, Netherlands
    • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis · Beverwijk, Netherlands
    • Spaarne Gasthuis · Hoofddorp, Netherlands
    • Dijklander Ziekenhuis · Hoorn, Netherlands
    • Zaans Medisch Centrum · Zaandam, Netherlands
    • Ziekenhuisgroep Twente · Almelo, Netherlands
    • Isala · Zwolle, Netherlands
    • Ijsselland Ziekenhuis · Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
    • Meander Medisch Centrum · Amersfoort, Netherlands
    Primary completion Mar 2027→Jun 2027
    Study completion May 2027→Jun 2027
    Secondary outcomes 4 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedTheNumber of participants receiving each type of treatment for the intra-abdominal abscess, consisting of percutaneous (radiological drainage), surgical drainage, antibiotic treatment or observation onlyTime frame: Within 90-days follow-up
    • EditedMicrobial cultures of intraMicroorganisms Identified in Intra-operative aspirate, based on culturesAspirate CulturesTime frame: Within 90-days follow-up
    • ChangedBefore Cost-effectivity,Now Cost-effectivity (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up
    • ChangedBefore Cost-effectivityNow Healthcare Costs (in Euros) Measured Using the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)Time frame: Within 90-days follow-up
    + 3 other changes: index terms, verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06841003
Lead sponsor
Spaarne Gasthuis
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Start date
Feb 24, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Emeline Gebro, Master of science degree
Contact
alpaca@spaarnegasthuis.nl
+31(0)23 2241685

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion