ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06705842Updated Dec 11, 2025

APPI-Cost Trial for Perforated Appendicitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of PVI and Usual Care in Perforated Appendicitis, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
346
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation in perforated appendicitis, to investigate barriers and facilitators to future implementation of PVI irrigation, and to collect costs and clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with non-perforated appendicitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perforated Appendicitis

Keywords

  • Perforated Appendicitis
  • Povidone Iodine
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Intra-abdominal abscess
  • Appendectomy
  • Implementation science
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 346 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 897 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility for Enrollment

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Plan to undergo appendectomy for acute appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative hemodynamic instability requiring ongoing infusion of vasopressors
  • Allergy to iodine
  • Uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
  • Renal dysfunction
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Primary language neither English nor Spanish
  • Lack of functioning telephone or email account
  • Incarcerated or in police custody

Eligibility for Randomization

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in study preoperatively
  • Intraoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-perforated appendicitis
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
346 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PVI

    Drug: PVI

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Drug: Usual Care

Interventions

  • DrugPVI

    After removal of the appendix from the patient's abdomen and attainment of hemostasis, 10 mL/kg of 1% PVI (up to a maximum of 1,000 mL) will be used to irrigate the pelvis and right upper and lower quadrants. The solution will be left to dwell for 1 minute and then suctioned out

  • DrugUsual Care

    Surgeons may utilize local irrigation with saline if deemed necessary, defined as instillation of a small volume (\<100 mL) of liquid followed by aspiration, for the purpose of confirming hemostasis or suctioning thick fluid. Some surgeons may utilize large volume irrigation with saline solution, if that is consistent with their usual practice. Patients in the usual care arm will not receive PVI irrigation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness of PVI relative to usual care

    Cost-effectiveness of PVI irrigation relative to usual care will be assessed as the incremental 30-day total societal costs per percent reduction in IAA rate. The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) will be calculated as: (societal costs with PVI irrigation minus societal costs with usual care) divided by (IAA rate with PVI minus IAA rate with usual care). IAA will be defined as an image-confirmed fluid collection deemed to be an IAA by an attending surgeon or radiologist, or an abscess confirmed during percutaneous intervention or reoperation. Societal costs will be defined as patient-reported costs plus medical costs for inpatient and outpatient care within 30 days from randomization. PVI will be deemed cost-effective by either 1) reducing 30-day IAA rate without increasing 30-day total societal costs, 2) reducing 30-day total societal costs without increasing 30-day IAA rate, or 3) reducing both 30-day societal costs and IAA rate.

    Time frame: 30 day follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total patient-reported costs

    Patient-reported costs will be assessed using a patient survey, which will be verbally administered by research personnel at each time point specified.

    Time frame: 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months

  2. Health-related quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    This is a 6 item questionnaire and the first 5 questions are each scored from 1 (no problem) - 5 (unable to), for a maximum score of 25, with a higher number indicating a worse outcome. The 6th question is scored on a Likert scale from 0 (worst health you can imagine) - 100 (best health you can imagine), with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months

  3. Index admission total hospital costs

    Time frame: Index admission (variable duration)

  4. 90-day total hospital costs

    Time frame: 90 day follow up

  5. Index admission total length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Index admission (variable duration)

  6. 90-day total length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 90 day follow up

  7. Number of days of work missed by participant

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Postoperative complications

    Complications include IAA, clinically relevant IAA, superficial/deep surgical site infection, ED visit, readmission, reoperation, subsequent procedure, or mortality

    Time frame: 90 days follow up

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Starting 6 months after study publication, de-identified data and study materials may be made available to researchers on a case-by-case basis.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 14 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2024
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
StartActual
Apr 7, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
Last update
Dec 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06705842
Responsible party
Dalya M Ferguson, MD, MS (Assistant Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
Start date
Apr 7, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Study contacts

Dalya M Ferguson, MD, MS
Contact
Dalya.M.Ferguson@uth.tmc.edu
(713) 566-5098
Debbie Nguyen
Contact
Debbie.F.Lew@uth.tmc.edu
(713) 566-5098
Dalya Ferguson, MD, MS
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion