ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03476941AIDUpdated Sep 3, 2026Results posted

Antibiotic Irrigations for Intra-Abdominal Drains

A Phase 2 interventional study of Gentamicin Sulfate Inj 20mg/2ml vial for injection and Clindamycin phosphate 6 mg/1ml for injection in Abdominal Abscess, sponsored by University of Iowa. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by University of Iowa · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Low enrollment rate
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intra-abdominal abscesses are pus-filled pouches in the abdominal cavity. Current standard of care includes drain placement in the abscess cavity to reach source control as well as administration of systemic antibiotics. It is common practice to flush the drain on a daily basis to ensure patency. This study aims to analyze the clinical impact of a higher local concentration of antibiotics (rather than normal saline) provided through drain irrigation with an antimicrobial agent (Gentamicin and/or Clindamycin) compare to normal saline.

Read the detailed description

People with an abdominal abscess who undergo drain placement will have those drains irrigated twice/day with either normal saline (placebo group) or with the above antibiotic solution for a total of 7 days or less if the drain were to be removed earlier. Outcomes of interest are duration of systemic antibiotics, and WBC and temperature curve.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Abscess

Browse trials for

03

In context

Abdominal Abscess

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Abscess; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 105 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Abscess.

Browse Abdominal Abscess studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa is the lead sponsor of 279 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 45 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 40 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Intra-abdominal abscess drained with catheter/drain
  • Treatment with systemic antibiotics
  • Able to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abscess(es) not amendable for an image guided drain placement.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Antibiotic Irrigation

    The drain will be irrigated twice/day with the above antibiotic solution for 7 days maximum

    Drug: Gentamicin Sulfate Inj 20mg/2ml vial for injection · Drug: Clindamycin phosphate 6 mg/1ml for injection

  • Placebo comparator
    Normal Saline Irrigation

    The drain will be irrigated twice/day with normal saline

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGentamicin Sulfate Inj 20mg/2ml vial for injection

    Irrigate surgical drain with total amount of 5 mg in 10 ml volume twice/day for 7 days or until drain removal if less than 7 days of therapy.

  • DrugClindamycin phosphate 6 mg/1ml for injection

    Drug page: Clindamycin phosphate

    Irrigate surgical drain with total amount of 12 mg in 10 ml volume once daily for 7 days or until drain removal if less than 7 days of therapy.

  • OtherPlacebo

    The placebo group will receive drain irrigation twice/day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Systemic Antibiotics:

    Total duration of systemic antibiotics will be recorded from the start of the treatment until discontinuation by primary care team. This will be measured as days from diagnosis to when the antibiotic treatment gets interrupted. Duration of systemic antibiotics will be our primary outcome measurement. Duration of systemic antibiotics will be monitored as an indication of the effectiveness of the proposed intervention.

    Time frame: From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. White Blood Count

    White blood count level from the blood draw will be measured starting from the admission until discharge or discontinuation by primary care team. During follow up, if white blood count will be measured, will record up to 1 month follow up. The white blood count will be measured once daily and as needed depending on clinical changes. We will plan to trend WBC as another indication of decreasing systemic inflammation.

    Time frame: From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up

  2. Maximum Temperature From Initiation of Systemic Treatment Until 1 Month Follow up

    Temperature will be measured every 8 hours starting from admission and until patient discharge. And also temperature will be measured during each follow up clinic visit. Change in temperature is monitored as an indication of decrease systemic inflammation.

    Time frame: From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up

07

Results

Posted Sep 3, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Recruitment will be dependent on admission of patients meeting inclusion criteria and their willingness to participate in the study

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAntibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline Irrigation
Started11
Completed11
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDuration of Systemic Antibiotics:

Total duration of systemic antibiotics will be recorded from the start of the treatment until discontinuation by primary care team. This will be measured as days from diagnosis to when the antibiotic treatment gets interrupted. Duration of systemic antibiotics will be our primary outcome measurement. Duration of systemic antibiotics will be monitored as an indication of the effectiveness of the proposed intervention.

Time frame:
From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up
Reported as:
Number · days
Duration of Systemic Antibiotics:
daysAntibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline Irrigation
Duration of Systemic Antibiotics:1926
SecondaryWhite Blood Count

White blood count level from the blood draw will be measured starting from the admission until discharge or discontinuation by primary care team. During follow up, if white blood count will be measured, will record up to 1 month follow up. The white blood count will be measured once daily and as needed depending on clinical changes. We will plan to trend WBC as another indication of decreasing systemic inflammation.

Time frame:
From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up
Reported as:
Number · 10^9 cells per liter
White Blood Count
10^9 cells per literAntibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline Irrigation
White Blood Count17.5—
SecondaryMaximum Temperature From Initiation of Systemic Treatment Until 1 Month Follow up

Temperature will be measured every 8 hours starting from admission and until patient discharge. And also temperature will be measured during each follow up clinic visit. Change in temperature is monitored as an indication of decrease systemic inflammation.

Time frame:
From initiation of systemic treatment until 1 month follow up
Reported as:
Number · °C
Maximum Temperature From Initiation of Systemic Treatment Until 1 Month Follow up
°CAntibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline Irrigation
Maximum Temperature From Initiation of Systemic Treatment Until 1 Month Follow up39.7—

Adverse events

Collected over - Clinical outcomes may be collected up to 30 days post discharge. - Subject participation in the study will last approximately 30 days with no additional follow up visits as part of the involvement in this study. - Data from clinical visits and/or follow up within the 30 days will be collected as part of the research.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Antibiotic Irrigation0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Normal Saline Irrigation0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

no description was possible as only 1 subject was enroll in each arm

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Antibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline IrrigationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years112
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Antibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline IrrigationTotal
Median40 (40 to 40)47 (47 to 47)43.5 (40 to 47)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Antibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline IrrigationTotal
Female000
Male112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Antibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline IrrigationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White112
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Antibiotic IrrigationNormal Saline IrrigationTotal
United States112
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yoon YI, Hwang S, Cho YJ, Ha TY, Song GW, Jung DH. Therapeutic effect of trans-drain administration of antibiotics in patients showing intractable pancreatic leak-associated pus drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2015 Feb;19(1):17-24. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.17. Epub 2015 Feb 28. PubMed 26155272 ↗
  • Sauermann R, Karch R, Kjellsson MC, Feurstein T, Puspok A, Langenberger H, Bohmdorfer M, Jager W, Zeitlinger M. Good penetration of moxifloxacin into human abscesses. Pharmacology. 2012;90(3-4):146-50. doi: 10.1159/000341550. Epub 2012 Aug 3. PubMed 22868236 ↗
  • Sauermann R, Feurstein T, Karch R, Kjellsson MC, Jager W, Bohmdorfer M, Puspok A, Langenberger H, Wild T, Winkler S, Zeitlinger M. Abscess penetration of cefpirome: concentrations and simulated pharmacokinetic profiles in pus. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;68(10):1419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1270-1. Epub 2012 Mar 23. PubMed 22441316 ↗
  • Zimmerman LH, Tyburski JG, Glowniak J, Singla R, Lavery T, Nailor M, Stassinopoulus J, Hong K, Barshikar S, Dolman HS, Baylor AE, Wilson RF. Impact of evaluating antibiotic concentrations in abdominal abscesses percutaneously drained. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):348-52; discussion 352. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.010. PubMed 21367377 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At this point, there is no IPD sharing plan and not included in the consent process.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Oct 2020, 18 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2026, 5 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2017
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
StartActual
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 21, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03476941
Lead sponsor
University of Iowa
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2020
Completion
Oct 21, 2020
Results posted
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Scott Sherman, MD
principal investigator · University of Iowa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Clindamycin phosphate

Start the discussion