CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06834425Updated Feb 19, 2025

Efficacy of NSAID Peritendinous Injection for Acute Tendinitis

An interventional study of Peritendinous NSAID injection and Control group (placebo) in Tendinitis, Acute Tendonitis and NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug), sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates whether NSAID peritendinous or ligament injections at acute sprain sites can relieve pain and restore function.

Forty patients will be randomly assigned to either the injection or oral NSAID group. Pain will be assessed subjectively using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and objectively through pressure pain threshold measurements. Functional outcomes (DASH for the upper limb, FADI for the lower limb) will be evaluated before treatment and at 3 days, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-treatment.

Read the detailed description

Acute tendon inflammation is a common sports injury, typically treated with oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or local corticosteroid injections at the affected site. Direct corticosteroid injections provide the fastest relief; however, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has restricted the use of corticosteroids by any route in its latest banned substance list. As a result, corticosteroid injections into tendons or joints, which were previously allowed during competitions, can no longer be used. Currently, the only methods available for acute inflammation relief during competitions are oral NSAIDs and ice therapy. For athletes without structural damage who need to quickly reduce inflammation and return to play, these methods may be insufficient.

Previous clinical studies on NSAID injections into tendons and joints have shown that local NSAID injections are equally effective as corticosteroid injections for treating shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis. However, these studies mainly focused on patients with chronic arthritis and tendinitis. The difference in efficacy between oral NSAIDs and tendon injections during the acute phase of inflammation remains unknown. This study aims to compare different routes of NSAID administration to identify the most appropriate treatment for managing acute tendinitis in high-level athletes.

We hypothesize that peritendinous NSAID injections will provide greater pain relief and functional improvement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tendinitis
  • Acute Tendonitis
  • NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tendinopathy

413 studies on the registry are indexed under Tendinopathy; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 339 interventional studies indexed under Tendinopathy.

Browse Tendinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ultrasonography diagnosed acute tendinitis with inflammation
  • 20-70 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment.
  • Post operation at painful site.
  • Neuropathic pain or vascularity disease
  • Unable to receive injection therapy, including a history of syncope during injection.
  • Allergy history to NSAID
  • Within 14 days after coronary artery bypass graft, CABG
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Local anesthetics and NSAID(parecoxib) peritendinous Injection for acute tendinitis

    Drug: Peritendinous NSAID injection

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Local anesthetics and normal saline peritendinous injection for acute tendinitis

    Drug: Control group (placebo)

Interventions

  • DrugPeritendinous NSAID injection

    Peritendinous NSAID (parecoxib) injection

    Also known as: NSAID injection

  • DrugControl group (placebo)

    Normal saline mixed with local anesthetics injection

    Also known as: Sham injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    The 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a subjective pain assessment tool that ranges from 0 to 10. A score of '0' indicates the complete absence of pain (e.g., "no pain"), while a score of '10' represents the most severe pain imaginable (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). This scale allows individuals to quantify their pain intensity, facilitating communication between patients and healthcare providers for better pain management.

    Time frame: Baseline, at 12 hours post-injection, and on each day from 1 to 7 days after the injection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)

    Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for upper limb functionality

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection

  2. Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)

    Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) for lower limb functionality.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection

  3. Pain pressure threshold

    A manometer was used to measure the pain pressure threshold at the most tender point of the affected area.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University
    Taipei, 116, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rhim HC, Ruiz J, Taseh A, Afunugo W, Crockett Z, Schon J, Pan X, Shin J, Schowalter S, Jang KM, Robinson DM. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1132. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041132. PubMed 38398445 ↗
  • Ziradkar R, Best TM, Quintero D, Paultre K. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;15(4):579-591. doi: 10.1177/19417381221108726. Epub 2022 Jul 27. PubMed 35897160 ↗
  • Sardana V, Burzynski J, Hasan K, Zalzal P. Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections an alternative to steroid injections for musculoskeletal pain?: A systematic review. J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):812-816. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.022. eCollection 2018 Sep. PubMed 30140124 ↗
  • Kim YB, Lee WS, Won JS. The effects of a single-dose subacromial injection of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in geriatric patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized double-blind study. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Mar;24(1):4-8. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00052. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PubMed 33652505 ↗
  • Bellamy JL, Goff BJ, Sayeed SA. Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 18. PubMed 27402605 ↗
  • Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22. PubMed 23177167 ↗
  • Shakeel H, Ahmad TS. Steroid injection versus NSAID injection for trigger finger: a comparative study of early outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jul;37(7):1319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.040. PubMed 22721455 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06834425
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
Responsible party
Yu-Hsuan Cheng (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical Univerisity, Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 19, 2025
Start date
Feb 10, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2025

Study contacts

Yu-Hsuan Cheng, MD, MS
study chair · Taipei Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion