An interventional study of gamified scenario-based teaching in Education, sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-26.
Sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Research Objective: This study aims to explore the effectiveness of gamified situational teaching in improving nurses' awareness and confidence in clinical emergency response.
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Convenience sampling was adopted, and the inclusion criteria included: nurses with more than 3 months of experience working in general wards; the exclusion criteria included: nurses in pediatric-related wards (including neonatal observation rooms and pediatric intensive care units).
The effectiveness of gamified scenario-based teaching in improving nurses' awareness and confidence in clinical emergency care
Other: gamified scenario-based teaching
A randomized controlled trial design was used, employing convenient sampling to recruit 68 nurses from a general ward of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Research tools included demographic and related data, an emergency knowledge scale, a self-confidence scale, and satisfaction assessment
First Aid Skills Questionnaire
This study used a randomized controlled trial design. Blocked randomization was employed, dividing participants into an experimental group (gamified learning) and a control group (online video instruction). The experimental group learned first aid techniques using gamified learning, which involved taking photos of clinical first aid scenarios and placing them into the application. The application then transformed the photos into story scenarios, which the experimental group members would then immerse themselves in. The control group received instruction using existing online videos from the hospital.Two groups were enrolled using the hospital's emergency medical knowledge questionnaire at three stages: before intervention, after intervention, and one month after intervention. The questionnaire consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions. A correct answer was worth 10 points, while an incorrect answer or an answer that did not know was worth 0 points. The total score ranged from 0 to 100
Time frame: one month
Confidence Scale
The C-scale (Grundy, 1993) was used for measurement. This scale has been translated into Chinese by scholars. The scale has a Cronbach's α value of 0.91 and a CVI value of 1.0, indicating good quantity-response reliability and validity. This scale consists of five items, with each item scored from one to five points, for a total score of 5 to 25 points. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in the research subjects' emergency treatment and techniques.
Time frame: one month
Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Jan 2026, 0 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital →